Evaluating societal preferences for human papillomavirus vaccine and cervical smear test screening programme

Background Cervical cancer and genital warts are diseases associated with human papillomavirus (HPV) infection. Cervical smear testing is used as a cervical cancer screening tool in most countries worldwide. The newly introduced vaccines that prevent HPV infections are the quadrivalent vaccine (Gardasil), which prevents genital warts and cervical cancer, and the bivalent vaccine (Cervarix), which prevents cervical cancer only. Public preferences for HPV vaccines and smear test screening were determined using a discrete choice experiment. Methods Participants from across Canada completed a choice-based questionnaire to measure preferences from which willingness to pay (WTP) was calculated for the following: (1) lifetime risk of cervical cancer and genital warts, (2) frequency of smear testing, (3) need for vaccine booster, (4) target group to vaccinate, (5) frequency of side effects and (6) cost of the vaccine (from 2008). A mixed effect logistic model was used to analyse the data. Results Of the 1157 participants, the mean age was 44 years (SD 15) and 49% were women. Respondents preferred a vaccine that gave lifelong immunity, a vaccination programme that targeted boys and girls and a vaccine that gave protection from genital warts and cervical cancer. Respondents were averse to yearly smear testing. On average, respondents were willing to pay $C53 and $C22 to avoid a 1% increase in the risk of cervical cancer and genital warts, respectively. Conclusions Society agrees with the introduction of the HPV vaccination programme, but would prefer a programme that targets boys and girls with the quadrivalent vaccine.

[1]  C. Maxwell,et al.  Factors Important in Promoting Cervical Cancer Screening among Canadian Women: Findings from the 1996–97 National Population Health Survey (NPHS) , 2001, Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique.

[2]  C. Marra,et al.  Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness of Human Papillomavirus Vaccine , 2012, PharmacoEconomics.

[3]  M. Naus,et al.  Parental intention to have daughters receive the human papillomavirus vaccine , 2007, Canadian Medical Association Journal.

[4]  F. Olesen A case-control study of cervical cytology before diagnosis of cervical cancer in Denmark. , 1988, International journal of epidemiology.

[5]  A Ludbrook,et al.  Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences , 2001, Quality in health care : QHC.

[6]  Daron G Ferris,et al.  Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent anogenital diseases. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  David R. Scott,et al.  Baseline cytology, human papillomavirus testing, and risk for cervical neoplasia: a 10-year cohort analysis. , 2003, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[8]  F. X. Bosch,et al.  Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions , 2007 .

[9]  D. Eddy Screening for cervical cancer. , 1990, Annals of internal medicine.

[10]  C. Wheeler,et al.  Efficacy of a quadrivalent prophylactic human papillomavirus (types 6, 11, 16, and 18) L1 virus-like-particle vaccine against high-grade vulval and vaginal lesions: a combined analysis of three randomised clinical trials , 2007, The Lancet.

[11]  N. Kiviat,et al.  Development and duration of human papillomavirus lesions, after initial infection. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[12]  A. Miller Failures of cervical cancer screening. , 1995, American journal of public health.

[13]  Rosalie Viney,et al.  Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. , 2002, Health economics.

[14]  K. Aronson,et al.  Oncogenic Human Papillomavirus Infection and Cervical Lesions in Aboriginal Women of Nunavut, Canada , 2001, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[15]  S. Goldie,et al.  The value of including boys in an HPV vaccination programme: a cost-effectiveness analysis in a low-resource setting , 2007, British Journal of Cancer.

[16]  W. Edmunds,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analyses of human papillomavirus vaccination. , 2007, Lancet. Infectious Diseases (Print).

[17]  Edson Duarte Moreira Júnior,et al.  Quadrivalent vaccine against human papillomavirus to prevent high-grade cervical lesions. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  Erik J. Dasbach,et al.  Model for Assessing Human Papillomavirus Vaccination Strategies , 2007, Emerging infectious diseases.

[19]  Henry C Kitchener,et al.  Future acceptance of adolescent human papillomavirus vaccination: a survey of parental attitudes. , 2006, Vaccine.

[20]  P. Garcia,et al.  Examination of volunteer bias in research involving patients diagnosed with psychogenic nonepileptic seizures , 2009, Epilepsy & Behavior.

[21]  L Beardsley,et al.  Natural history of cervicovaginal papillomavirus infection in young women. , 1998, The New England journal of medicine.

[22]  C. Carswell Measuring and Valuing Health Benefits for Economic Valuation , 2007, PharmacoEconomics.

[23]  A Ludbrook,et al.  Use of discrete choice experiments to elicit preferences , 2001 .

[24]  J. Peto,et al.  Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide , 1999, The Journal of pathology.

[25]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[26]  T. Hofer,et al.  Socioeconomic disparities in preventive care persist despite universal coverage. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Ontario and the United States. , 1994, JAMA.

[27]  C Milligan,et al.  Screening for cervical cancer. , 1975, The American journal of nursing.

[28]  J. Fortenberry,et al.  A longitudinal study of genital human papillomavirus infection in a cohort of closely followed adolescent women. , 2005, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[29]  Julie Ratcliffe,et al.  Measuring and valuing health benefits for economic evaluation in adolescence: an assessment of the practicality and validity of the child health utility 9D in the Australian adolescent population. , 2012, Value in health : the journal of the International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research.

[30]  W. Melchers,et al.  Parental acceptance of Human Papillomavirus vaccines. , 2008, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[31]  Howard Bauchner,et al.  Parental acceptance of the human papillomavirus vaccine. , 2005, The Journal of adolescent health : official publication of the Society for Adolescent Medicine.

[32]  L. Lynd,et al.  An Evaluation of Patients' Willingness to Trade Symptom-Free Days for Asthma-Related Treatment Risks: A Discrete Choice Experiment , 2008, The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma.

[33]  C. Quach,et al.  National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI). , 1989, Canada diseases weekly report = Rapport hebdomadaire des maladies au Canada.