Peak skin and eye lens radiation dose from brain perfusion CT based on Monte Carlo simulation.

OBJECTIVE The purpose of our study was to accurately estimate the radiation dose to skin and the eye lens from clinical CT brain perfusion studies, investigate how well scanner output (expressed as volume CT dose index [CTDI(vol)]) matches these estimated doses, and investigate the efficacy of eye lens dose reduction techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS Peak skin dose and eye lens dose were estimated using Monte Carlo simulation methods on a voxelized patient model and 64-MDCT scanners from four major manufacturers. A range of clinical protocols was evaluated. CTDI(vol) for each scanner was obtained from the scanner console. Dose reduction to the eye lens was evaluated for various gantry tilt angles as well as scan locations. RESULTS Peak skin dose and eye lens dose ranged from 81 mGy to 348 mGy, depending on the scanner and protocol used. Peak skin dose and eye lens dose were observed to be 66-79% and 59-63%, respectively, of the CTDI(vol) values reported by the scanners. The eye lens dose was significantly reduced when the eye lenses were not directly irradiated. CONCLUSION CTDI(vol) should not be interpreted as patient dose; this study has shown it to overestimate dose to the skin or eye lens. These results may be used to provide more accurate estimates of actual dose to ensure that protocols are operated safely below thresholds. Tilting the gantry or moving the scanning region further away from the eyes are effective for reducing lens dose in clinical practice. These actions should be considered when they are consistent with the clinical task and patient anatomy.

[1]  Wesley E Bolch,et al.  Organ and effective doses in pediatric patients undergoing helical multislice computed tomography examination. , 2007, Medical physics.

[2]  R. Shore,et al.  Cataracts among Chernobyl Clean-up Workers: Implications Regarding Permissible Eye Exposures , 2007, Radiation research.

[3]  W. Huda,et al.  Overview of patient dosimetry in diagnostic radiology in the USA for the past 50 years. , 2008, Medical physics.

[4]  Nina Petoussi-Henss,et al.  The GSF family of voxel phantoms , 2002, Physics in medicine and biology.

[5]  K. Chakrabarti,et al.  Experimental estimates of peak skin dose and its relationship to the CT dose index using the CTDI head phantom. , 2013, Radiation protection dosimetry.

[6]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  A method to generate equivalent energy spectra and filtration models based on measurement for multidetector CT Monte Carlo dosimetry simulations. , 2009, Medical physics.

[7]  Joaquim M Farinhas,et al.  Lateral Decubitus Positioning for Cervical Nerve Root Block Using CT Image Guidance Minimizes Effective Radiation Dose and Procedural Time , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[8]  J. Damilakis,et al.  The effect of head size∕shape, miscentering, and bowtie filter on peak patient tissue doses from modern brain perfusion 256-slice CT: how can we minimize the risk for deterministic effects? , 2013, Medical physics.

[9]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[10]  Kenneth A. Miles,et al.  Perfusion imaging with computed tomography: brain and beyond , 2006, European radiology.

[11]  T D Solberg,et al.  A Monte Carlo tutorial and the application for radiotherapy treatment planning. , 2002, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[12]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  Monte Carlo simulations to assess the effects of tube current modulation on breast dose for multidetector CT , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[13]  Icrp 1990 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection , 1991 .

[14]  Atsushi Minamoto,et al.  A REANALYSIS OF ATOMIC-BOMB CATARACT DATA, 2000–2002: A THRESHOLD ANALYSIS , 2006, Health physics.

[15]  J. Valentin,et al.  Avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. , 2000, Annals of the ICRP.

[16]  A. Hida,et al.  Cataract in atomic bomb survivors , 2004, International journal of radiation biology.

[17]  J J DeMarco,et al.  A Monte Carlo-based method to estimate radiation dose from spiral CT: from phantom testing to patient-specific models , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[18]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Current status and new horizons in Monte Carlo simulation of X-ray CT scanners , 2007, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[19]  J. Boone,et al.  CT dose index and patient dose: they are not the same thing. , 2011, Radiology.

[20]  Ehsan Samei,et al.  Estimation of radiation exposure for brain perfusion CT: standard protocol compared with deviations in protocol. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[21]  James Eastwood,et al.  Multidetector Computed Tomography in Cerebrovascular Disease : CT Perfusion Imaging , 2007 .

[22]  J J DeMarco,et al.  A Monte Carlo based method to estimate radiation dose from multidetector CT (MDCT): cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms. , 2005, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  M. Wintermark Brain perfusion-CT in acute stroke patients , 2005, European radiology.

[24]  J J DeMarco,et al.  Estimating radiation doses from multidetector CT using Monte Carlo simulations: effects of different size voxelized patient models on magnitudes of organ and effective dose , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[25]  R. Cloutier Tissue Substitutes in Radiation Dosimetry and Measurement. , 1989 .

[26]  Cynthia H McCollough,et al.  The feasibility of a scanner-independent technique to estimate organ dose from MDCT scans: using CTDIvol to account for differences between scanners. , 2010, Medical physics.

[27]  Bruce H Alexander,et al.  Risk of cataract after exposure to low doses of ionizing radiation: a 20-year prospective cohort study among US radiologic technologists. , 2008, American journal of epidemiology.

[28]  R. Shore,et al.  Postoperative Cataract Cases among Atomic Bomb Survivors: Radiation Dose Response and Threshold , 2007, Radiation research.