Estimating the rate of retinal ganglion cell loss in glaucoma.

PURPOSE To present and evaluate a new method of estimating rates of retinal ganglion cell (RGC) loss in glaucoma by combining structural and functional measurements. DESIGN Observational cohort study. METHODS The study included 213 eyes of 213 glaucoma patients followed up for an average of 4.5 ± 0.8 years with standard automated perimetry visual fields and optical coherence tomography. A control group of 33 eyes of 33 glaucoma patients underwent repeated tests over a short period to test the specificity of the method. An additional group of 52 eyes from 52 healthy subjects followed up for an average of 4.0 ± 0.7 years was used to estimate age-related losses of RGCs. Estimates of RGC counts were obtained from standard automated perimetry and optical coherence tomography, and a weighted average was used to obtain a final estimate of the number of RGCs for each eye. The rate of RGC loss was calculated for each eye using linear regression. Progression was defined by a statistically significant slope faster than the age-expected loss of RGCs. RESULTS From the 213 eyes, 47 (22.1%) showed rates of RGC loss that were faster than the age-expected decline. A larger proportion of glaucomatous eyes showed progression based on rates of RGC loss rather than based on isolated parameters from standard automated perimetry (8.5%) or optical coherence tomography (14.6%; P < .01), while maintaining similar specificities in the stable group. CONCLUSIONS The rate of RGC loss estimated from combining structure and function performed better than either isolated structural or functional measures for detecting progressive glaucomatous damage.

[1]  H. Quigley,et al.  Number of ganglion cells in glaucoma eyes compared with threshold visual field tests in the same persons. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[2]  Earl L. Smith,et al.  Neural losses correlated with visual losses in clinical perimetry. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[3]  R. Harwerth,et al.  Linking structure and function in glaucoma , 2010, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[4]  F. Medeiros,et al.  A combined index of structure and function for staging glaucomatous damage. , 2012, Archives of ophthalmology.

[5]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Agreement for detecting glaucoma progression with the GDx guided progression analysis, automated perimetry, and optic disc photography. , 2010, Ophthalmology.

[6]  F. Medeiros,et al.  The Relationship between intraocular pressure and progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[7]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): III. Ancestry differences in visual function in healthy eyes. , 2010, Archives of ophthalmology.

[8]  P. Khaw,et al.  Primary open-angle glaucoma , 2004, The Lancet.

[9]  Haogang Zhu,et al.  Quantifying discordance between structure and function measurements in the clinical assessment of glaucoma. , 2011, Archives of ophthalmology.

[10]  A. Tafreshi,et al.  Diagnosing preperimetric glaucoma with spectral domain optical coherence tomography. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[11]  M. C. Leske,et al.  Natural history of open-angle glaucoma. , 2009, Ophthalmology.

[12]  Michael V. Boland,et al.  Evaluation of a combined index of optic nerve structure and function for glaucoma diagnosis , 2011, BMC ophthalmology.

[13]  Y. Kawagoe SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY , 1956 .

[14]  R L Williams,et al.  A Note on Robust Variance Estimation for Cluster‐Correlated Data , 2000, Biometrics.

[15]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Combining structural and functional measurements to improve detection of glaucoma progression using Bayesian hierarchical models. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[16]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  False-negative responses in glaucoma perimetry: indicators of patient performance or test reliability? , 2000, American journal of ophthalmology.

[17]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  The African Descent and Glaucoma Evaluation Study (ADAGES): design and baseline data. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[18]  B. Chauhan,et al.  Longitudinal changes in the visual field and optic disc in glaucoma , 2005, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[19]  H. Jampel,et al.  Natural history of normal-tension glaucoma. , 2001, Ophthalmology.

[20]  M. Nicolela,et al.  Properties of the statpac visual field index. , 2011, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[21]  James G. Fujimoto,et al.  Retinal nerve fibre layer thickness measurement reproducibility improved with spectral domain optical coherence tomography , 2009, British Journal of Ophthalmology.

[22]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Detection of glaucoma progression with stratus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements. , 2009, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[23]  W. Swanson,et al.  Development and evaluation of a linear staircase strategy for the measurement of perimetric sensitivity , 2006, Vision Research.

[24]  Nicholas G Strouthidis,et al.  Optic disc and visual field progression in ocular hypertensive subjects: detection rates, specificity, and agreement. , 2006, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[25]  J. Jonas,et al.  Ophthalmoscopic evaluation of the optic nerve head. , 1999, Survey of ophthalmology.

[26]  B. Bengtsson,et al.  A visual field index for calculation of glaucoma rate of progression. , 2008, American journal of ophthalmology.

[27]  Nicholas G Strouthidis,et al.  Monitoring glaucomatous progression using a novel Heidelberg Retina Tomograph event analysis. , 2007, Ophthalmology.

[28]  Robert N Weinreb,et al.  Relationship of intraocular pressure and frequency of spontaneous retinal venous pulsation in primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2012, Ophthalmology.

[29]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer, optic nerve head, and macular thickness measurements for glaucoma detection using optical coherence tomography. , 2005, American journal of ophthalmology.

[30]  Donald C. Hood,et al.  A framework for comparing structural and functional measures of glaucomatous damage , 2007, Progress in Retinal and Eye Research.

[31]  F. Fitzke,et al.  Scaling the hill of vision: the physiological relationship between light sensitivity and ganglion cell numbers. , 2000, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[32]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Prediction of functional loss in glaucoma from progressive optic disc damage. , 2009, Archives of ophthalmology.

[33]  F. Medeiros,et al.  Rates of progressive retinal nerve fiber layer loss in glaucoma measured by scanning laser polarimetry. , 2010, American journal of ophthalmology.

[34]  G. Wollstein,et al.  Optical coherence tomography longitudinal evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer thickness in glaucoma. , 2005, Archives of ophthalmology.

[35]  Shu Liu,et al.  Evaluation of retinal nerve fiber layer progression in glaucoma: a study on optical coherence tomography guided progression analysis. , 2010, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[36]  E. E. Hartmann,et al.  The Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study: a randomized trial determines that topical ocular hypotensive medication delays or prevents the onset of primary open-angle glaucoma. , 2002, Archives of ophthalmology.

[37]  Valter Torri,et al.  Results of the European Glaucoma Prevention Study. , 2005, Ophthalmology.

[38]  S. K. Seah,et al.  Initial management of acute primary angle closure: a randomized trial comparing phacoemulsification with laser peripheral iridotomy. , 2012, Ophthalmology.