Negotiation mechanisms for an order subcontracting and scheduling problem

We consider a decentralized decision-making environment in which a firm and its subcontractor make decisions on subcontracting heterogeneous orders for processing with private information. We design two market-like negotiation mechanisms that adopt the multi-round ascending pricing framework under two negotiation protocols, labeled as Protocols 1 and 2. Applying game-theoretic and combinatorial optimization approaches, we analyze the decision behaviors of both players and derive the final negotiation outcomes. We find that the negotiation mechanism under Protocol 1 cannot guarantee the existence of the equilibrium price, while the negotiation mechanism under Protocol 2 result in equilibrium solutions. For some special cases, we investigate the system performance bounds under the two negotiation mechanisms and find that the performance bounds under the former are better than those under the latter.

[1]  Eran Hanany,et al.  Decentralization Cost in Scheduling: A Game-Theoretic Approach , 2007, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[2]  Evan L. Porteus,et al.  Selling to the Newsvendor: An Analysis of Price-Only Contracts , 2001, Manuf. Serv. Oper. Manag..

[3]  Susan A. Slotnick,et al.  Order acceptance with weighted tardiness , 2007, Comput. Oper. Res..

[4]  D. Du,et al.  Quantifying the efficiency of price-only contracts in push supply chains over demand distributions of known supports , 2014 .

[5]  Qianqian Zhu,et al.  Subcontracting price schemes for order acceptance and scheduling , 2015 .

[6]  Walter O. Rom,et al.  Order acceptance using genetic algorithms , 2009, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  Gérard P. Cachon Supply Chain Coordination with Contracts , 2003, Supply Chain Management.

[8]  Ceyda Oguz,et al.  A tabu search algorithm for order acceptance and scheduling , 2012, Comput. Oper. Res..

[9]  F. Sibel Salman,et al.  Order acceptance and scheduling decisions in make-to-order systems , 2010 .

[10]  Jian Jhen Chen,et al.  Fresh- Product Supply Chain Management with Logistics Outsourcing , 2013 .

[11]  Rudolf Müller,et al.  Games and Mechanism Design in Machine Scheduling—An Introduction , 2007 .

[12]  Michael P. Wellman,et al.  Auction Protocols for Decentralized Scheduling , 2001, Games Econ. Behav..

[13]  Pierre Massotte,et al.  Comparison of negotiation protocols in dynamic agent-based manufacturing systems , 2006 .

[14]  Selcuk Karabati,et al.  An Auction Mechanism for Pricing and Capacity Allocation with Multiple Products , 2014 .

[15]  Shih-Wei Lin,et al.  Order acceptance and scheduling to maximize total net revenue in permutation flowshops with weighted tardiness , 2015, Appl. Soft Comput..

[16]  George L. Vairaktarakis,et al.  Sequencing Strategies and Coordination Issues in Outsourcing and Subcontracting Operations , 2011 .

[17]  Nicholas G. Hall,et al.  Market Good Flexibility in Capacity Auctions , 2013 .

[18]  Hartmut Stadtler,et al.  Negotiation-based collaborative planning between supply chains partners , 2005, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[19]  D. Simchi-Levi,et al.  Supplier-Buyer Negotiation Games: Equilibrium Conditions and Supply Chain Efficiency , 2012 .

[20]  Hadi Charkhgard,et al.  Order acceptance and scheduling problems in two-machine flow shops: New mixed integer programming formulations , 2016, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[21]  T. C. Edwin Cheng,et al.  Order acceptance and scheduling on two identical parallel machines , 2015, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[22]  Susan A. Slotnick,et al.  Order acceptance and scheduling: A taxonomy and review , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[23]  Jae Hyung Cho,et al.  Supply chain formation using agent negotiation , 2010, Decis. Support Syst..