The time course of plausibility effects on eye movements in reading: evidence from noun-noun compounds.

Readers' eye movements were monitored as they read sentences containing noun-noun compounds that varied in frequency (e.g., elevator mechanic, mountain lion). The left constituent of the compound was either plausible or implausible as a head noun at the point at which it appeared, whereas the compound as a whole was always plausible. When the head noun analysis of the left constituent was implausible, reading times on this word were inflated, beginning with the first fixation. This finding is consistent with previous demonstrations of very rapid effects of plausibility on eye movements. Compound frequency did not modulate the plausibility effect, and all disruption was resolved by the time readers' eyes moved to the next word. These findings suggest (contra Kennison, 2005) that the parser initially analyzes a singular noun as a head instead of a modifier. In addition, the findings confirm that the very rapid effect of plausibility on eye movements is not due to strategic factors, because in the present experiment, unlike in previous demonstrations, this effect appeared in sentences that were globally plausible.

[1]  G. Altmann,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2007 .

[2]  Lyn Frazier,et al.  Immediate disambiguation of lexically ambiguous words during reading: evidence from eye movements. , 2006, British journal of psychology.

[3]  M. Kutas,et al.  Reading senseless sentences: brain potentials reflect semantic incongruity. , 1980, Science.

[4]  K. Rayner,et al.  Lexical complexity and fixation times in reading: Effects of word frequency, verb complexity, and lexical ambiguity , 1986, Memory & cognition.

[5]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  C. Clifton,et al.  Syntactic prediction in language comprehension: evidence from either...or. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Edward Gibson,et al.  Online Syntactic Storage Costs in Sentence Comprehension. , 2005 .

[8]  Tessa Warren,et al.  Investigating effects of selectional restriction violations and plausibility violation severity on eye-movements in reading , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Effects of context on eye movements when reading about possible and impossible events. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[10]  Keith Rayner,et al.  Children's and Adults’ Processing of Anomaly and Implausibility during Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements , 2008, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[11]  W Ni,et al.  Anomaly Detection: Eye Movement Patterns , 1998, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[12]  J. H. Bertera,et al.  Latency of sequential eye movements: implications for reading. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[13]  K. Rayner,et al.  Making and correcting errors during sentence comprehension: Eye movements in the analysis of structurally ambiguous sentences , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Colin M. Brown,et al.  Semantic Integration in Sentences and Discourse: Evidence from the N400 , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Altmann,et al.  Incremental interpretation at verbs: restricting the domain of subsequent reference , 1999, Cognition.

[16]  K. Rayner,et al.  Effects of contextual constraint on eye movements in reading: A further examination , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[17]  G. McConkie,et al.  What guides a reader's eye movements? , 1976, Vision Research.

[18]  M. Posner,et al.  Establishing a time‐line of word recognition: evidence from eye movements and event‐related potentials , 1998, Neuroreport.

[19]  Barbara J. Juhasz,et al.  The effect of plausibility on eye movements in reading. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[20]  K. Rayner,et al.  Measuring word recognition in reading: eye movements and event-related potentials , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[21]  Shelia M. Kennison,et al.  Different time courses of integrative semantic processing for plural and singular nouns: implications for theories of sentence processing , 2005, Cognition.

[22]  D. Balota,et al.  Against parafoveal semantic preprocessing during eye fixations in reading. , 1986, Canadian journal of psychology.

[23]  K. Rayner.  Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[24]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  The extended argument dependency model: a neurocognitive approach to sentence comprehension across languages. , 2006, Psychological review.

[25]  Ellen F. Lau,et al.  The role of structural prediction in rapid syntactic analysis , 2006, Brain and Language.

[26]  Erik D. Reichle,et al.  The E-Z Reader model of eye-movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models , 2003, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[27]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Language learning and innateness: Some implications of Compounds Research , 2003, Cognitive Psychology.

[28]  G. Altmann,et al.  The time-course of prediction in incremental sentence processing: Evidence from anticipatory eye-movements , 2003 .

[29]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Semantic codes are not used in integrating information across eye fixations in reading: Evidence from fluent Spanish-English bilinguals , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[30]  P. Gordon.  Level-ordering in lexical development , 1985, Cognition.

[31]  Adrian Staub,et al.  Eye movements and on-line comprehension processes , 2007 .

[32]  K. Rayner,et al.  Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency , 1986, Perception & psychophysics.

[33]  M A Just,et al.  A theory of reading: from eye fixations to comprehension. , 1980, Psychological review.

[34]  K. Rayner,et al.  Contextual effects on word perception and eye movements during reading , 1981 .

[35]  Curt Burgess,et al.  The effect of corpus size in predicting reaction time in a basic word recognition task: Moving on from Kučera and Francis , 1998 .

[36]  Matthias Schlesewsky,et al.  Fractionating language comprehension via frequency characteristics of the human EEG , 2004, Neuroreport.

[37]  Weijia Ni,et al.  Readers' Eye Movements Distinguish Anomalies of Form and Content , 2002, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[38]  Robin K. Morris,et al.  The use of thematic role information in parsing: Syntactic processing autonomy revisited , 2003 .

[39]  Kara D. Federmeier,et al.  Electrophysiology reveals semantic memory use in language comprehension , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.