A review contribution to emission trading schemes and low carbon growth

[1]  G. Owusu,et al.  Contributions toward sustainable development: a bibliometric analysis of sustainability reporting research , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[2]  Lois Addo Agyepong,et al.  Mapping the knowledge frontiers of public risk communication in disaster risk management , 2022, Journal of Risk Research.

[3]  P. Failler,et al.  Quantify the Effect of China’s Emission Trading Scheme on Low-carbon Eco-efficiency: Evidence from China’s 283 Cities , 2022, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change.

[4]  J. D. Ampah,et al.  Investigating evolutionary trends and characteristics of renewable energy research in Africa: a bibliometric analysis from 1999 to 2021 , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[5]  Xianchun Tan,et al.  Research on the national climate governance system toward carbon neutrality—A critical literature review , 2022, Fundamental research.

[6]  Nana Adwoa Anokye Effah,et al.  Improvements or deteriorations? A bibliometric analysis of corporate governance and disclosure research (1990–2020) , 2022, Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development.

[7]  Xiaosong Ren,et al.  Can China’s carbon emissions trading scheme achieve a double dividend? , 2022, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[8]  Yuquan W. Zhang,et al.  A bibliometric review on carbon accounting in social science during 1997–2020 , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[9]  Ghassan Abu-Lebdeh,et al.  A comprehensive hierarchical blockchain system for carbon emission trading utilizing blockchain of things and smart contract , 2021, Technological Forecasting and Social Change.

[10]  J. D. Ampah,et al.  Visualization and analysis of mapping knowledge domains for the global transition towards clean cooking: a bibliometric review of research output from 1990 to 2020 , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[11]  Feng Dong,et al.  Exploring volatility of carbon price in European Union due to COVID-19 pandemic , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[12]  H. Basse Mama,et al.  Do investors care about carbon emissions under the European Environmental Policy? , 2021, Business Strategy and the Environment.

[13]  V. Costantini,et al.  Modelling the European Union Sustainability Transition: A Soft-Linking Approach , 2021, Sustainability.

[14]  N. Mac Dowell,et al.  Delivering low-carbon electricity systems in sub-Saharan Africa: insights from Nigeria , 2021 .

[15]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  A bibliometric study about energy, environment, and climate change , 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[16]  Y. Geng,et al.  Trends and driving forces of low-carbon energy technology innovation in China’s industrial sectors from 1998 to 2017: from a regional perspective , 2021 .

[17]  Daiqing Zhao,et al.  The impact of emission trading schemes on firm competitiveness: Evidence of the mediating effects of firm behaviors from the guangdong ETS. , 2021, Journal of environmental management.

[18]  Abdullah Al Mamun,et al.  Climate Change Mitigation Pathways for the Aviation Sector , 2021, Sustainability.

[19]  B. McMullin,et al.  Carbon Dioxide Removal Policy in the Making: Assessing Developments in 9 OECD Cases , 2021, Frontiers in Climate.

[20]  Anne Marit Heiaas.  The EU ETS and Aviation: Evaluating the Effectiveness of the EU Emission Trading System in Reducing Emissions from Air Travel , 2021, Review of Business and Economics Studies.

[21]  A. Ullah,et al.  Estimation of economic benefits associated with the reduction in the CO2 emission due to COVID-19 , 2021, Environmental Challenges.

[22]  Gørild M. Heggelund,et al.  China’s climate and energy policy: at a turning point? , 2021, International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics.

[23]  Xiaohong Wang,et al.  Effects of emission trading system on green total factor productivity in China: Empirical evidence from a quasi-natural experiment , 2021 .

[24]  R. Schaeffer,et al.  Energy system transitions and low-carbon pathways in Australia, Brazil, Canada, China, EU-28, India, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Russia and the United States , 2021 .

[25]  Jessica F. Green.  Does carbon pricing reduce emissions? A review of ex-post analyses , 2021 .

[26]  Qiao-Mei Liang,et al.  Recent progress of cooperation on climate mitigation: A bibliometric analysis , 2020 .

[27]  A. Abareshi,et al.  Blockchain Technology and Its Role in Enhancing Supply Chain Integration Capability and Reducing Carbon Emission: A Conceptual Framework , 2020, Sustainability.

[28]  Tatiana Filatova,et al.  Economy-wide impacts of behavioral climate change mitigation: Linking agent-based and computable general equilibrium models , 2020, Environ. Model. Softw..

[29]  Xiu-Hao Ding,et al.  Exploring the domain of open innovation: Bibliometric and content analyses , 2020 .

[30]  Ling Li,et al.  Quantitative models in emission trading system research: A literature review , 2020, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[31]  Sufang Zhang,et al.  State versus market in China's low-carbon energy transition: An institutional perspective , 2020 .

[32]  Ye Zhou,et al.  Does Emission Trading Boost Carbon Productivity? Evidence from China’s Pilot Emission Trading Scheme , 2020, International journal of environmental research and public health.

[33]  Liang Sun,et al.  Present status and development suggestions of carbon emission permit trading , 2020, IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science.

[34]  Andrej Kastrin,et al.  Scientometric analysis and knowledge mapping of literature-based discovery (1986–2020) , 2020, Scientometrics.

[35]  Jochen Markard,et al.  Political conflict and climate policy: the European emissions trading system as a Trojan Horse for the low-carbon transition? , 2020, Climate Policy.

[36]  Man-Keun Kim,et al.  Carbon leakage in energy/forest sectors and climate policy implications using meta-analysis , 2020, Forest Policy and Economics.

[37]  S. Kartha,et al.  Equity, climate justice and fossil fuel extraction: principles for a managed phase out , 2020, Climate Policy.

[38]  Stephane de la Rue du Can,et al.  Technologies and policies to decarbonize global industry: Review and assessment of mitigation drivers through 2070 , 2020, Applied Energy.

[39]  P. Nie,et al.  A clean innovation comparison between carbon tax and cap-and-trade system , 2020 .

[40]  Patrick Bayer,et al.  The European Union Emissions Trading System reduced CO2 emissions despite low prices , 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Qin Zhang,et al.  Outlining the keyword co-occurrence trends in Shuanghuanglian injection research: A bibliometric study using CiteSpace III , 2020, Journal of Traditional Chinese Medical Sciences.

[42]  S. Drews,et al.  A review of agent‐based modeling of climate‐energy policy , 2020, WIREs Climate Change.

[43]  Xin Wang,et al.  Research on the impact of carbon emission trading system on low-carbon technology innovation , 2020, Carbon Management.

[44]  S. Kerr,et al.  The New Zealand Emissions Trading Scheme: critical review and future outlook for three design innovations , 2020 .

[45]  L. Wegener.  Can the Paris Agreement Help Climate Change Litigation and Vice Versa? , 2020, Transnational Environmental Law.

[46]  Haijun Zhang,et al.  China's pilot emissions trading schemes and competitiveness: An empirical analysis of the provincial industrial sub-sectors. , 2020, Journal of environmental management.

[47]  B. Stevens,et al.  The scientific challenge of understanding and estimating climate change , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Yan Zhang,et al.  Estimating the impacts of emissions trading scheme on low-carbon development , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[49]  Miroslav Hájek,et al.  Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries , 2019, Energy Policy.

[50]  Hannah Snyder,et al.  Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines , 2019, Journal of Business Research.

[51]  N. Mac Dowell,et al.  Higher Carbon Prices on Emissions Alone Will Not Deliver the Paris Agreement , 2019, Joule.

[52]  João Carlos Correia Baptista Soares de Mello,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to the h-index , 2019, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[53]  A. Michaelowa,et al.  Additionality revisited: guarding the integrity of market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement , 2019, Climate Policy.

[54]  Nicolas Koch,et al.  Does the EU Emissions Trading System induce investment leakage? Evidence from German multinational firms , 2019, Energy Economics.

[55]  Lei Liu,et al.  The EU-China relationship in a new era of global climate governance , 2019, Asia Europe Journal.

[56]  A. Gurgel,et al.  International market mechanisms under the Paris Agreement: A cooperation between Brazil and Europe , 2019, Energy Policy.

[57]  Y. Yamineva,et al.  Cleaning the air, protecting the climate: Policy, legal and institutional nexus to reduce black carbon emissions in China , 2019, Environmental science & policy.

[58]  J. Edmonds,et al.  CCUS in China’s mitigation strategy: insights from integrated assessment modeling , 2019, International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control.

[59]  Wei Li,et al.  Prospective exploration of future renewable portfolio standard schemes in China via a multi-sector CGE model , 2019, Energy Policy.

[60]  Yoonmo Koo,et al.  The differentiated impact of emissions trading system based on company size , 2019, Climate Policy.

[61]  J. Lelieveld,et al.  Effects of fossil fuel and total anthropogenic emission removal on public health and climate , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[62]  D. Popp.  Environmental Policy and Innovation: A Decade of Research , 2019, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[63]  R. Long,et al.  Can a carbon emission trading scheme generate the Porter effect? Evidence from pilot areas in China. , 2019, The Science of the total environment.

[64]  Yuan Zhou,et al.  How do low-carbon policies promote green diffusion among alliance-based firms in China? An evolutionary-game model of complex networks , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[65]  Jason Hawkins,et al.  Development of environmentally extended social accounting matrices for policy analysis in Alberta , 2019 .

[66]  Yutao Wang,et al.  Cities: The core of climate change mitigation , 2019, Journal of Cleaner Production.

[67]  Ali Bonyadi Naeini,et al.  A review of agent-based modeling (ABM) concepts and some of its main applications in management science , 2018 .

[68]  J. Tollefson.  IPCC says limiting global warming to 1.5 °C will require drastic action , 2018, Nature.

[69]  Ruo-Yu Ke,et al.  Integrated impact of the carbon quota constraints on enterprises within supply chain: Direct cost and indirect cost , 2018, Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews.

[70]  K. Sommerfeld,et al.  Why does emissions trading under the EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) not affect firms’ competitiveness? Empirical findings from the literature , 2018, Climate Policy.

[71]  S. Knuth.  “Breakthroughs” for a green economy? Financialization and clean energy transition , 2018, Energy Research & Social Science.

[72]  Sheng Zhou,et al.  The influence of different allowance allocation methods on China's economic and sectoral development , 2018 .

[73]  K. S. Gallagher,et al.  Carbon pricing in practice: a review of existing emissions trading systems , 2018 .

[74]  Junjie Zhang,et al.  Carbon Pricing Induces Innovation: Evidence from China's Regional Carbon Market Pilots , 2018 .

[75]  Prakash Loungani,et al.  The long-run decoupling of emissions and output: Evidence from the largest emitters , 2018, Energy Policy.

[76]  M. Zhang,et al.  Past, current, and future research on microalga-derived biodiesel: a critical review and bibliometric analysis , 2018, Environmental Science and Pollution Research.

[77]  S. Shidore,et al.  Turning the carbon supertanker: Sectoral feasibility of climate change mitigation in China , 2018 .

[78]  Fiorenza Belussi,et al.  The role of collaborative networks in supporting the innovation performances of lagging-behind European regions , 2018 .

[79]  Pete Smith,et al.  Natural climate solutions , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[80]  P. Friedlingstein,et al.  Emission budgets and pathways consistent with limiting warming to 1.5 °C , 2017 .

[81]  J-F Mercure,et al.  Environmental impact assessment for climate change policy with the simulation-based integrated assessment model E3ME-FTT-GENIE , 2017, 1707.04870.

[82]  M. Byers,et al.  The Internationalization of Climate Damages Litigation , 2017 .

[83]  Y. Ho,et al.  Comparison of environmental laws publications in Science Citation Index Expanded and Social Science Index: a bibliometric analysis , 2016, Scientometrics.

[84]  Bundit Limmeechokchai,et al.  CO2 mitigation in Thailand’s low-carbon society: The potential of renewable energy , 2016 .

[85]  Wenying Chen,et al.  Towards low carbon development in China: a comparison of national and global models , 2016, Climatic Change.

[86]  B. Limmeechokchai,et al.  Energy security of three selected Asian countries , 2016 .

[87]  Chuanglin Fang,et al.  The relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: Empirical evidence from China. , 2016, The Science of the total environment.

[88]  I. Ozturk,et al.  The effect of renewable energy consumption on economic growth: Evidence from top 38 countries , 2016 .

[89]  A. Savaresi.  The Paris Agreement: a new beginning? , 2016 .

[90]  Alex Y. Lo,et al.  Challenges to the development of carbon markets in China , 2016 .

[91]  Huibin Du,et al.  Past, current and future of biomass energy research: A bibliometric analysis , 2015 .

[92]  Alexander Teytelboym,et al.  A Third Wave in the Economics of Climate Change , 2015 .

[93]  Danièle Revel,et al.  Carbon Emissions Trading in China: The Evolution from Pilots to a Nationwide Scheme , 2015 .

[94]  ZhongXiang Zhang,et al.  Carbon emissions trading in China: the evolution from pilots to a nationwide scheme , 2015 .

[95]  André Sternberg,et al.  Power-to-What? : Environmental assessment of energy storage systems , 2015 .

[96]  Meen Chul Kim,et al.  Emerging trends and new developments in regenerative medicine: a scientometric update (2000 – 2014) , 2014, Expert opinion on biological therapy.

[97]  Meen Chul Kim,et al.  Orphan drugs and rare diseases: a scientometric review (2000 – 2014) , 2014 .

[98]  R. Pindyck.  Climate Change Policy: What Do the Models Tell Us? , 2013 .

[99]  J. Peel.  Issues in Climate Change Litigation , 2012 .

[100]  W. Chueh,et al.  A thermochemical study of ceria: exploiting an old material for new modes of energy conversion and CO2 mitigation , 2010, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[101]  Yusuf Chisti,et al.  Fuels from microalgae , 2010 .

[102]  Jianhua Hou,et al.  The structure and dynamics of cocitation clusters: A multiple-perspective cocitation analysis , 2010, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[103]  Chih-Sheng Lin,et al.  Reduction of CO2 by a high-density culture of Chlorella sp. in a semicontinuous photobioreactor. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[104]  Chaomei Chen,et al.  CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[105]  Charles Auffray,et al.  F1000Prime recommendation of An index to quantify an individual's scientific research output. , 2005 .

[106]  J. Doucha,et al.  Utilization of flue gas for cultivation of microalgae Chlorella sp.) in an outdoor open thin-layer photobioreactor , 2005, Journal of Applied Phycology.

[107]  Yizhe Dong,et al.  Does China’s Emission Trading Scheme Affect Corporate Financial Performance: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment , 2023, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[108]  L. Tian,et al.  Green behavior towards low-carbon society: Theory, measurement and action , 2021 .

[109]  Yooncheong Cho,et al.  Development of an Electronic Greenhouse Gas Emission Management Platform: Managerial Implications , 2020 .

[110]  Baran Doda,et al.  Voluntary offsetting: credits and allowances , 2020 .

[111]  Bo Shen,et al.  Can environmental innovation facilitate carbon emissions reduction? Evidence from China , 2017 .

[112]  J. Sólyom,et al.  Structure and dynamics , 2010 .

[113]  Shui Bin,et al.  Consumer lifestyle approach to US energy use and the related CO2 emissions , 2005 .

[114]  Energy Research & Social Science , 2022 .