Click to Connect: Netnography and Tribal Advertising

ABSTRACT Copywriters ground advertising insight in their understanding of the consumer. In contemporary consumer culture, much meaningful consumption takes places in a communal, collective, and tribal environment. Advertisers and copywriters in particular would benefit from a culturally-grounded understanding of the language, meanings, rituals, and practices of the consumer tribes with which advertising seeks to communicate. This article suggests that the rigorous application of netnography—the online practice of anthropology—could be helpful to advertisers and copywriters as they seek this enhanced understanding. Netnography is faster, simpler, timelier, and much less expensive than traditional ethnography. Because it is unelicited, it is more naturalistic and unobtrusive than focus groups, surveys, or interviews. However, it still largely text-based, anonymous, poses ethical issues, is often overwhelming, can invite superficial and decontextualized interpretation, and requires considerable researcher acuity. In a detailed interpretation of a single newsgroup posting, I seek to demonstrate the level of cultural nuance required for quality netnographic interpretation and the potential of the method for generating technocultural insights to guide advertising copywriters.

[1]  Wendell Bell,et al.  The Third Wave. , 1982 .

[2]  P. Kotler The Prosumer Movement : a New Challenge For Marketers , 1986 .

[3]  C. Bacon-Smith Enterprising Women: Television Fandom and the Creation of Popular Myth , 1991 .

[4]  Henry Jenkins Textual Poachers: Television Fans & Participatory Culture , 1992 .

[5]  Gregg J. Rickman : Textual Poachers: Television Fans and Participatory Culture . Henry Jenkins. , 1993 .

[6]  Arthur J. Kover Copywriters' Implicit Theories of Communication: An Exploration , 1995 .

[7]  J. McAlexander,et al.  Subcultures of Consumption: An Ethnography of the New Bikers , 1995 .

[8]  R. Kozinets QI Want to BelieveQ: a Netnography of the X-Philes Subculture of Consumption , 1997 .

[9]  R. Kozinets On Netnography: Initial Reflections on Consumer Research Investigations of Cyberculture , 1998 .

[10]  R. Kozinets E-tribalized Marketing?: The Strategic Implications of Virtual Communities of Consumption , 1999 .

[11]  R. Kozinets Utopian Enterprise: Articulating the Meanings of Star Trek’s Culture of Consumption , 2001 .

[12]  R. Kozinets The Field behind the Screen: Using Netnography for Marketing Research in Online Communities , 2002 .

[13]  M. Gilly,et al.  We Are What We Post? Self‐Presentation in Personal Web Space , 2003 .

[14]  M. Molesworth,et al.  An exploratory study of the failure of online organisational communication , 2004 .

[15]  R. Langer,et al.  Sensitive research topics: netnography revisited , 2005 .

[16]  Russell W. Belk,et al.  The Cult of Macintosh , 2005 .

[17]  A. Muñiz,et al.  Religiosity in the Abandoned Apple Newton Brand Community , 2005 .

[18]  Suzan Burton,et al.  Online word‐of‐mouth: a comparison of American and Chinese discussion boards , 2006 .

[19]  Michelle Renee Nelson,et al.  Exploring cross-cultural ambivalence: a netnography of intercultural wedding message boards , 2005 .

[20]  Lars Frederiksen,et al.  Why Do Users Contribute to Firm-Hosted User Communities? The Case of Computer-Controlled Music Instruments , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[21]  Kristine De Valck,et al.  Virtual Communities of Consumption: Networks of Consumer Knowledge and Companionship , 2006 .

[22]  Hye-Shin Kim,et al.  Exploratory study of virtual communities of apparel retailers , 2006 .

[23]  Victor Jupp,et al.  The SAGE Dictionary of Social Research Methods , 2006 .

[24]  Andrea Hemetsberger,et al.  Learning and Knowledge-building in Open-source Communities , 2006 .

[25]  R. Belk Handbook of Qualitative Research Methods in Marketing , 2008 .