Investigations into extreme ultraviolet lithograph (EEUVL) image formation of horizontal (perpendicular to the illumination angle) features have found asymmetric aerial images. This is an expected outcome of the off-axis chief ray angle (CRA)) illumination in the EUV lithography system. The asymmetry arises from interference effects in the mask multilayer stack as well as interactions with the mask absorber. The aerial image arriving at the wafer displays an asymmetric shape, which contributes too a reduced contrast on the dark-side absorber, while the light-side absorber contrast remains sharp. This is not the preferred situation as the low-contrast dark-side can lead to reduced imaging robustness during manufacturing. Preliminary studies show that mask absorber sidewall angle (SWA) impacts pattern formation partially through aerial image asymmetries. The light and dark-side of the absorbers form a standing wave in the gap between them due to absorber side wall reflection and corner scattering. The absorbers’ standing waves further interact with the standing waves from the mask stack. Optimizing the absorber SWA is hypothesized to improve contrast thereby improving patterning robustness. This study investigated the impact of absorber SWA on aerial image shape using simulation. The study was designed to understand if an optimal SWWA exists that improves patterning robustness in a manufacturing environment. CD, contrast, focus response, and other data were gathered and presented to understand the impact of SWA on patterning. From these simulated data, the possibility of an optimum SWA was explored.
[1]
Peter De Bisschop,et al.
Stochastic effects in EUV lithography: random, local CD variability, and printing failures
,
2017
.
[2]
Osamu Suga,et al.
Impact of mask absorber properties on printability in EUV lithography
,
2007,
SPIE Photomask Technology.
[3]
Ki-Ho Baik,et al.
TaN-based EUV mask absorber etch study
,
2006,
Photomask Japan.
[4]
Emily Gallagher,et al.
Impact of EUV photomask line-edge roughness on wafer prints
,
2012,
Photomask Technology.
[5]
Vicky Philipsen,et al.
Characterization and mitigation of 3D mask effects in extreme ultraviolet lithography
,
2017
.
[6]
S. Burger,et al.
Rigorous FEM simulation of EUV masks: influence of shape and material parameters
,
2006,
SPIE Photomask Technology.
[7]
Iwao Nishiyama,et al.
Impact of Slanted Absorber Side Walls on Critical Dimension Error in Extreme Ultraviolet Lithography
,
2007
.
[8]
Chris A. Mack.
Using the Normalized Image Log-Slope, part 6: Development Path
,
2002
.
[9]
Lawrence S. Melvin,et al.
Modeling EUVL patterning variability for metal layers in 5nm technology node and its effect on electrical resistance
,
2017,
Advanced Lithography.