SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS - DEFINITIONS, CHALLENGES FOR USE AND RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPROVEMENTS.

In high-risk organizations much effort has been made to standardize procedures in order to streamline human action, to decrease risk and increase productivity. The purpose of using IT-based Safety Management System is to code and share best practices, create corporate knowledge directories and to create knowledge networks for organizations. In the risk and safety literature, these management systems are given various names and definitions. The aim for this paper is to give a review of relevant safety literature and come to a unifying definition of what an IT-based Safety Management System is, describe the purpose of such systems and challenges with using Safety Management Systems. In the various definitions used in the research literature, we find certain common features: computer based superstructures, or umbrellas, containing procedures, descriptions and checklists on how different tasks should be performed, and what kind of safety standards different tasks require. Usually these procedures are disseminated throughout the organization via an internal computer network, an intranet, where (hopefully) all employees can access the necessary documents. A central argument in this paper is that the concept of interpretation has been neglected in the safety literature, and that Safety Management Systems should be analysed as a part of an organisations communication. The Safety Management System is constructed at an executive level in the organization and distributed to the lower levels, and at the lower levels, it must be interpreted by the users. There is no guarantee that it will be interpreted as intended. In the development and implementation phases Safety Management Systems in professional organizations the emphasis has often been mainly on the technical requirements, but more attention should be given to the social and cultural facets of knowledge management

[1]  Pia Oedewald,et al.  Assessing the maintenance unit of a nuclear power plant -- identifying the cultural conceptions concerning the maintenance work and the maintenance organization , 2006 .

[2]  Barry Kirwan,et al.  Safety Management Assessment and Task Analysis—A Missing Link? , 1998 .

[3]  Kenneth Pettersen,et al.  Explaining safe work practices in aviation line maintenance , 2008 .

[4]  Jacques Leplat,et al.  Hollnagel, E. (2009). The ETTO Principle: Efficiency - Thoroughness Trade - Off. Why things that go right sometimes go wrong? . Farnham (U.K.): Ashgate , 2009 .

[5]  Kathryn Mearns,et al.  Safety climate, safety management practice and safety performance in offshore environments , 2003 .

[6]  Eleonora Bottani,et al.  Safety Management Systems: Performance Differences Between Adopters and Non-Adopters , 2009 .

[7]  Torgeir Haavik,et al.  Making drilling operations visible: the role of articulation work for organisational safety , 2010, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[8]  N. McDonald Organisational Resilience and Industrial Risk , 2017 .

[9]  Chun Wei Choo Environmental scanning as information seeking and organizational learning , 2001, Inf. Res..

[10]  Gilberto Santos,et al.  The main benefits associated with health and safety management systems certification in Portuguese small and medium enterprises post quality management system certification , 2013 .

[11]  D. Borys,et al.  EXPLORING RISK-AWARENESS AS A CULTURAL APPROACH TO SAFETY: EXPOSING THE GAP BETWEEN WORK AS IMAGINED AND WORK AS ACTUALLY PERFORMED , 2009 .

[12]  David Norheim AKSIO - Active knowledge management in the petroleum industry , 2006 .

[13]  Andrew Hale,et al.  MODELLING OF SAFETY MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS , 1997 .

[14]  Karin Laumann,et al.  Safety Management Systems as communication in an oil and gas producing company , 2015 .

[15]  K. Laumann,et al.  End User Involvement in the Development of Procedures and Safety Management Systems , 2014 .

[16]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[17]  Stian Antonsen,et al.  Safety Culture: Theory, Method and Improvement , 2012 .

[18]  Teemu Reiman,et al.  Understanding maintenance work in safety-critical organisations – managing the performance variability , 2011 .

[19]  Petter Grytten Almklov,et al.  REDUCING THE GAP BETWEEN PROCEDURES AND PRACTICE - LESSONS FROM A SUCCESSFUL SAFETY INTERVENTION , 2008 .

[20]  Rebecca Lawton,et al.  Not working to rule: Understanding procedural violations at work , 1998 .

[21]  Yves Dien Safety and application of procedures, or `how do `they' have to use operating procedures in nuclear power plants?' , 1998 .

[22]  Mathilde Bourrier,et al.  Organizing Maintenance Work At Two American Nuclear Power Plants , 1996 .

[23]  Beatriz Fernández-Muñiz,et al.  Safety management system: Development and validation of a multidimensional scale , 2007 .

[24]  Alistair Cheyne,et al.  Assessing safety culture in offshore environments. , 2000 .

[25]  Gudela Grote,et al.  Coordination in high-risk organizations: the need for flexible routines , 2009, Cognition, Technology & Work.

[26]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  An introduction to human factors engineering , 1997 .

[27]  Likoebe M. Maruping,et al.  Offshore information systems project success: the role of social embeddedness and cultural characteristics , 2009 .

[28]  M. Fischetti Working knowledge. , 2003, Scientific American.

[29]  M. Bhasi,et al.  A study on the impact of management system certification on safety management , 2011 .

[30]  Kathleen M Sutcliffe,et al.  High reliability organizations (HROs). , 2011, Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology.

[31]  Peter Sohlberg,et al.  Kunskapens former : Vetenskapsteori och forskningsmetod , 2008 .

[32]  Chrisanthi Avgerou,et al.  The applicability of software engineering in information systems development , 1987, Inf. Manag..

[33]  Em El-Koursi,et al.  Harmonising Safety Management Systems in the European Railway Sector , 2007 .

[34]  Ching-Fu Chen,et al.  Scale development of safety management system evaluation for the airline industry. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[35]  S. Dekker Failure to adapt or adaptations that fail: contrasting models on procedures and safety. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[36]  D. Morley Television, Audiences and Cultural Studies , 1992 .

[37]  Linda J. Bellamy,et al.  WHICH MANAGEMENT SYSTEM FAILURES ARE RESPONSIBLE FOR OCCUPATIONAL ACCIDENTS , 2010 .

[38]  Erik Hollnagel,et al.  Barriers And Accident Prevention , 2004 .

[39]  Jaime Santos-Reyes,et al.  A SSMS model with application to the oil and gas industry , 2009 .

[40]  E. Hollnagel The Etto Principle: Efficiency-Thoroughness Trade-Off: Why Things That Go Right Sometimes Go Wrong , 2009 .

[41]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Building an effective safety management system for airlines , 2008 .