A Modulation Dependent Channel Coherence Metric for VANET Simulation Using IEEE 802.11p

The most common physical layer models for network simulations are the bit error rate and the SNR threshold model. In time-varying channels such as those experienced in vehicular networks, these models are assumed valid as long as the packet duration is less than the coherence time of the channel. The coherence time is a statistical measure of the channel invariance. It is independent of the signal parameters or the receiver structure. While it is convenient to decouple the system performance from the channel, this paper shows that this simplification may lead to inaccurate performance assessments and erroneous conclusions. This paper suggests a new metric, the normalized empirical coherence time (NETC), based on results from an extensive simulation campaign of a typical IEEE 802.11p system. The NETC delineates the minimum time (as a percentage of signal duration) over which the system achieves some performance threshold. The metric is explicitly a function of modulation, packet duration, and the traditional coherence time. This new metric could be used in place of the traditional coherence time as a constraint on the packet duration necessary to assume channel variation has negligible impact on performance.

[1]  James A. Ritcey,et al.  16-QAM BICM-ID in fading channels with imperfect channel state information , 2003, IEEE Trans. Wirel. Commun..

[2]  Celestino A. Corral,et al.  On the suitability of 802.11a/RA for high-mobility DSRC , 2002, Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37367).

[3]  Hariharan Krishnan,et al.  Performance evaluation of safety applications over DSRC vehicular ad hoc networks , 2004, VANET '04.

[4]  Mahrokh G. Shayesteh,et al.  On the error probability of linearly modulated signals on frequency-flat Ricean, Rayleigh, and AWGN channels , 1995, IEEE Trans. Commun..

[5]  Michael P. Fitz,et al.  A new view of performance analysis techniques in correlated Rayleigh fading , 1999, WCNC. 1999 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (Cat. No.99TH8466).

[6]  Norman C. Beaulieu,et al.  Exact error-rate analysis of diversity 16-QAM with channel estimation error , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  Giorgio Taricco,et al.  Mismatched and Optimum Receivers for the Correlated Rician Fading MIMO Channel , 2006 .

[8]  Andrea Goldsmith,et al.  Wireless Communications , 2005, 2021 15th International Conference on Advanced Technologies, Systems and Services in Telecommunications (TELSIKS).

[9]  Abbas Jamalipour,et al.  Wireless communications , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[10]  Chirag S. Patel,et al.  Wireless Channel Modeling, Simulation, and Estimation , 2006 .

[11]  Krzysztof Szczypiorski,et al.  Performance Evaluation of IEEE 802.11 DCF Networks , 2007, International Teletraffic Congress.

[12]  Tadeusz Drwiega,et al.  Managing Traffic Performance in Converged Networks, 20th International Teletraffic Congress, ITC20 2007, Ottawa, Canada, June 17-21, 2007, Proceedings , 2007, International Teletraffic Congress.

[13]  A. Goldsmith,et al.  Effect of channel estimation error on M-QAM BER performance in Rayleigh fading , 1999, 1999 IEEE 49th Vehicular Technology Conference (Cat. No.99CH36363).

[14]  Celestino A. Corral,et al.  Pseudo-pilot OFDM scheme for 802.11a and R/A in DSRC applications , 2003, 2003 IEEE 58th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC 2003-Fall (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37484).

[15]  Ilenia Tinnirello,et al.  Remarks on IEEE 802.11 DCF performance analysis , 2005, IEEE Communications Letters.