As a scholarly field matures, theories emerge that guide paradigms and shape consensus in academic discourse. Management theories reflect a shared consensus on how individual behaviors or organizational actions result in a certain set of outcomes and under specific conditions. Clearly, theory is paramount to guiding whether models of potential relationships bear out and how and why we would expect a relationship or specific outcome. Yet much of this theory is derived from cumulative empirical evidence from a ‘context’ that has remained a silent partner in our quest for a theoretical contribution. A growing number of papers emphasize the theoretical contribution as disembodied from the context in which the empirical evidence of a causal relationship was gleaned. As an applied field, the emphasis on theory with disregard to the context of management practice presents a challenge for progress both as a scholarly domain and for credibility in what we teach and how we consult, or how we effect positive social change. This guest editorial joins a chorus of recent editorials in this journal (e.g., Tsui, 2013) and elsewhere (e.g., George, 2014) that suggest we rethink management scholarship, rejuvenate our ideas for research, and embed a nugget of practice in scholarly discourse.
[1]
Gerard George,et al.
Kinship in Entrepreneur Networks: Performance Effects of Resource Assembly in Africa
,
2014
.
[2]
A. Tsui.
The Spirit of Science and Socially Responsible Scholarship
,
2013,
Management and Organization Review.
[3]
Gerard George.
Publishing in AMJ for Non-U.S. Authors
,
2012
.
[4]
S. H. Ang,et al.
The interactions of institutions on foreign market entry mode
,
2015
.
[5]
Sinziana Dorobantu,et al.
Spinning gold: The financial returns to stakeholder engagement
,
2014
.
[6]
Gerard George,et al.
Publishing in AMJ: Part 1: Topic choice: From the Editors
,
2011
.
[7]
Gerard George,et al.
Rethinking Governance in Management Research
,
2014
.
[8]
G. George.
Rethinking Management Scholarship
,
2014
.