Assessment of Satellite-Derived Surface Reflectances by NASA's CAR Airborne Radiometer over Railroad Valley Playa

CAR (Cloud Absorption Radiometer) is a multi-angular and multi-spectral airborne radiometer instrument, whose radiometric and geometric characteristics are well calibrated and adjusted before and after each flight campaign. CAR was built by NASA (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) in 1984. On 16 May 2008, a CAR flight campaign took place over the well-known calibration and validation site of Railroad Valley in Nevada, USA (38.504°N, 115.692°W). The campaign coincided with the overpasses of several key EO (Earth Observation) satellites such as Landsat-7, Envisat and Terra. Thus, there are nearly simultaneous measurements from these satellites and the CAR airborne sensor over the same calibration site. The CAR spectral bands are close to those of most EO satellites. CAR has the ability to cover the whole range of azimuth view angles and a variety of zenith angles depending on altitude and, as a consequence, the biases seen between satellite and CAR measurements due to both unmatched spectral bands and unmatched angles can be significantly reduced. A comparison is presented here between CAR’s land surface reflectance (BRF or Bidirectional Reflectance Factor) with those derived from Terra/MODIS (MOD09 and MAIAC), Terra/MISR, Envisat/MERIS and Landsat-7. In this study, we utilized CAR data from low altitude flights (approx. 180 m above the surface) in order to minimize the effects of the atmosphere on these measurements and then obtain a valuable ground-truth data set of surface reflectance. Furthermore, this study shows that differences between measurements caused by surface heterogeneity can be tolerated, thanks to the high homogeneity of the study site on the one hand, and on the other hand, to the spatial sampling and the large number of CAR samples. These results demonstrate that satellite BRF measurements over this site are in good agreement with CAR with variable biases across different spectral bands. This is most likely due to residual aerosol effects in the EO derived reflectances.

[1]  J. Conel,et al.  PARABOLA III: A sphere‐scanning radiometer for field determination of surface anisotropic reflectance functions , 2000 .

[2]  The NPL Gonio RAdiometric Spectrometer System (GRASS) , 2008 .

[3]  Darrel L. Williams,et al.  An off-nadir-pointing imaging spectroradiometer for terrestrial ecosystem studies , 1991, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[4]  S. Hook,et al.  The MODIS/ASTER airborne simulator (MASTER) - a new instrument for earth science studies , 2001 .

[5]  Nadine Gobron,et al.  Using angular and spectral shape similarity constraints to improve MISR aerosol and surface retrievals over land , 2005 .

[6]  Chad J. Shuey,et al.  Validating MODIS land surface reflectance and albedo products: methods and preliminary results , 2002 .

[7]  E. Borg,et al.  Uncertainties of LAI estimation from satellite imaging due to atmospheric correction , 2014 .

[8]  S Ward,et al.  The Earth Observation Handbook , 2008 .

[9]  A. Strahler,et al.  On the derivation of kernels for kernel‐driven models of bidirectional reflectance , 1995 .

[10]  Michael D. King,et al.  Airborne spectral BRDF of various surface types (ocean, vegetation, snow, desert, wetlands, cloud decks, smoke layers) for remote sensing applications , 2016 .

[11]  Carol J. Bruegge,et al.  Vicarious calibration: A reflectance-based experiment with AirMISR , 2001 .

[12]  David J. Diner,et al.  The Airborne Multi-angle Imaging SpectroRadiometer (AirMISR): instrument description and first results , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[13]  Klaus I. Itten,et al.  A field goniometer system (FIGOS) for acquisition of hyperspectral BRDF data , 1999, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[14]  R. Dickinson,et al.  The role of satellite remote sensing in climate change studies , 2013 .

[15]  Mingxu Liu,et al.  Influence of aerosols and surface reflectance on satellite NO 2 retrieval: seasonal and spatial characteristics and implications for NO x emission constraints , 2015 .

[16]  François-Marie Bréon,et al.  Angular signatures of surface reflectances from airborne POLDER data , 1996 .

[17]  C. Tucker,et al.  Multi-angle implementation of atmospheric correction for MODIS (MAIAC): 3. Atmospheric correction , 2012 .

[18]  Didier Tanré,et al.  Second Simulation of the Satellite Signal in the Solar Spectrum, 6S: an overview , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[19]  Kurtis J. Thome,et al.  Evaluation of Railroad Valley playa for use in vicarious calibration , 1996, Optics & Photonics.

[20]  Lorenzo Bruzzone,et al.  A Special Issue on Big Data from Space for Geoscience and Remote Sensing [From the Guest Editors] , 2016 .

[21]  Van de Hulst,et al.  Multiple Light Scattering: Tables, Formulas, and Applications , 1980 .

[22]  T. Painter,et al.  Reflectance quantities in optical remote sensing - definitions and case studies , 2006 .

[23]  Eric Vermote,et al.  Atmospheric correction for the monitoring of land surfaces , 2008 .

[24]  Michael D. King,et al.  Variability in Surface BRDF at Different Spatial Scales (30 m-500 m) Over a Mixed Agricultural Landscape as Retrieved from Airborne and Satellite Spectral Measurements , 2011 .

[25]  E. Vermote,et al.  Operational Atmospheric Correction of Landsat TM Data , 1999 .

[26]  Robert E. Wolfe,et al.  A Landsat surface reflectance dataset for North America, 1990-2000 , 2006, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[27]  P. Atkinson,et al.  Uncertainty in remote sensing and GIS , 2002 .

[28]  Zhuosen Wang,et al.  Use of In Situ and Airborne Multiangle Data to Assess MODIS- and Landsat-Based Estimates of Directional Reflectance and Albedo , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.