Evaluating the Relation of Vocal Accommodation in Conversation Partners' Fundamental Frequencies to Perceptions of Communication Quality

Previous acoustic analysis of fundamental frequencies from interview partners' voices revealed mutual accommodation of voice frequency and amplitude. These findings also showed partners' accommodation was associated with such attributes as social status. However, previous studies did not assess the function of partners' voice accommodation in extending general communication quality. The present study employs an experimental protocol wherein the fundamental frequency is included in some conversations and filtered from others to show, first, that partners do actively accommodate the fundamental frequency of their voices, and, second, that elimination of the fundamental frequency from conversation partners' voices profoundly alters perceived positive evaluations by judges overhearing the conversation. This experiment specifies an important auxiliary role for the fundamental frequency in nonverbal communication.

[1]  James T. Webb.  Chapter 6 – Interview Synchrony: An Investigation of Two Speech Rate Measures in an Automated Standardized Interview , 1972 .

[2]  K. Burns,et al.  Significance of vocal and visual channels in the decoding of emotional meaning. , 1973, The Journal of communication.

[3]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  Speech physiology and acoustic phonetics : an introduction , 1977 .

[4]  Dennis Butler Fry.  The Physics of Speech , 1979 .

[5]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  A Quantitative Analysis of Temporal Symmetry in Microsocial Relations , 1983 .

[6]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  Intonation, Perception, And Language , 1967 .

[7]  Judee K. Burgoon,et al.  Talking fast and changing attitudes: A critique and clarification , 1983 .

[8]  The communication-value of content-free speech. , 1956, The American journal of psychology.

[9]  H. Giles,et al.  Language: Contexts and Consequences , 1991 .

[10]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  Voice pitch and amplitude convergence as a metric of quality in dyadic interviews , 1993 .

[11]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  What sounds beautiful is good: The vocal attractiveness stereotype , 1988 .

[12]  M. Natale.  Social Desirability as Related to Convergence of Temporal Speech Patterns , 1975 .

[13]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  The Origins of Language , 2019, The Study of Language.

[14]  Donald M. Taylor,et al.  Dimensions of welsh identity , 1977 .

[15]  M. Walker,et al.  Nonverbal dominance in the communication of affect: A myth? , 1987 .

[16]  E. Kramer.  ELIMINATION OF VERBAL CUES IN JUDGMENTS OF EMOTION FROM VOICE. , 1964, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[17]  M. Natale.  CONVERGENCE OF MEAN VOCAL INTENSITY IN DYADIC COMMUNICATION AS A FUNCTION OF SOCIAL DESIRABILITY , 1975 .

[18]  Jeffery Pittam,et al.  The Long-Term Spectral Measurement of Voice Quality as a Social and Personality Marker: A Review , 1987 .

[19]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  The vocal attractiveness stereotype: Replication and elaboration , 1990 .

[20]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Interpersonal Adaptation: Dyadic Interaction Patterns , 1995 .

[21]  Contributions of the german “expression psychology” to nonverbal behavior research part IV: The voice , 1986 .

[22]  C. Osgood.  Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. , 1962 .

[23]  D SHERMAN,et al.  The merits of backward playing of connected speech in the scaling of voice quality disorders. , 1954, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[24]  J. Burgoon,et al.  Adaptation in Dyadic Interaction: Defining and Operationalizing Patterns of Reciprocity and Compensation , 1993 .

[25]  J. Starkweather.  Content-free speech as a source of information about the speaker. , 1956, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[26]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  On the evolution of language: A unified view , 1973 .

[27]  Robert Rosenthal,et al.  Content filtering human speech: A simple electronic system , 1971 .

[28]  J. Matarazzo,et al.  A Speech Interaction System , 1987 .

[29]  Joseph N Cappella,et al.  Mutual Adaptation and Relativity of Measurement , 1991 .

[30]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  Analysis of fundamental frequency reveals covariation in interview partners' speech , 1990 .

[31]  M. Patterson,et al.  Invited article: A parallel process model of nonverbal communication , 1995 .

[32]  A. Fernald,et al.  A cross-language study of prosodic modifications in mothers' and fathers' speech to preverbal infants , 1989, Journal of Child Language.

[33]  Philip Lieberman,et al.  The Biology and Evolution of Language , 1984 .

[34]  Leslie A. Zebrowitz,et al.  Baby talk to the babyfaced , 1992 .

[35]  J. Pittam.  Voice in Social Interaction: An Interdisciplinary Approach , 1994 .

[36]  S. W. Gregory,et al.  A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. , 1996, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[37]  S. Feldstein,et al.  Rhythms of dialogue , 1970 .

[38]  M. Zuckerman,et al.  The attractive voice: What makes it so? , 1993 .

[39]  D. Berry.  Vocal attractiveness and vocal babyishness: Effects on stranger, self, and friend impressions , 1990 .

[40]  Michael Argyle,et al.  The communication of friendly and hostile attitudes by verbal and non‐verbal signals , 1971 .

[41]  M. Orne.  On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. , 1962 .