Using Evidence Based Practices and Learning to Enhance Critical Thinking Skills in Students Through Data Visualization

This research-to-practice work in progress paper outlines the use of evidence-based practices and learning to enhance critical thinking skills in students through data visualization. Data visualization is a multi-stage process that enables the transformation of complex data into visual representations that inform without overwhelming its audience. The purpose of this study is to investigate how data visualization learning experiences enhances students’ critical thinking skills. In this paper we identify the conceptualization of critical thinking in the data visualization process. A design-based research approach is used to empirically investigate the main research question: after participating in data visualization learning experiences, in what ways do students engage in design practices that enhance development of critical thinking skills? The working hypothesis is students experience greater learning gains when instructions include design challenges integrated with the data visualization process and mapped to critical thinking that requires them to exhibit higher-order-thinking skills. The first aim of the study is to identify critical thinking skills that are evident in the data visualization process. The second aim is to identify habits of the mind competencies that are evident in the data visualization process. The implications of this work will inform the implementation of the Paul-Elder critical thinking framework into the data visualization process with the goal of building essential intellectual traits in undergraduates. In this work, the data visualization process facilitates the logical structure of connected elements of higher-order thinking that relate to one another within the theoretical frameworks of critical thinking and habits of the mind. This research is significant because it informs the practice of engineering through a problem-solving activity and computing education by introducing data visualization as method for improving critical thinking skills; a requirement for STEM students, a desired skill for all students.

[1]  J. Eison,et al.  Using Active Learning Instructional Strategies to Create Excitement and Enhance Learning , 2010 .

[2]  Benjamin Fry,et al.  Visualizing data - exploring and explaining data with the processing environment , 2008 .

[3]  Nathan Yau.  Visualizing Spatial Relationships , 2015 .

[4]  Min Chen,et al.  Data, Information, and Knowledge in Visualization , 2009, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[5]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Beyond control of variables: What needs to develop to achieve skilled scientific thinking? , 2008 .

[6]  W. Sandoval.  Understanding Students' Practical Epistemologies and Their Influence on Learning Through Inquiry , 2005 .

[7]  Meredith D. Gall,et al.  Educational Research: An Introduction , 1965 .

[8]  Kwan-Liu Ma,et al.  Scientific Storytelling Using Visualization , 2012, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[9]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Improving Healthcare with Interactive Visualization , 2013, Computer.

[10]  Hermann Astleitner.  Teaching Critical Thinking , 2002 .

[11]  M. Sandelowski.  Qualitative analysis: what it is and how to begin. , 1995, Research in nursing & health.

[12]  Arthur L. Costa.  The school as a home for the mind , 2007 .

[13]  Junaid Qadir,et al.  Engineering Education, Moving into 2020s : Essential Competencies for Effective 21st Century Electrical & Computer Engineers , 2020, 2020 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

[14]  Barney,et al.  Theoretical Coding : Text Analysis in Grounded Theory , 2004 .

[15]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as mindtools for engaging learners in critical thinking , 1998 .

[16]  Scott Heath,et al.  Discovering patterns of touch: A case study for visualization-driven analysis in Human-Robot Interaction , 2016, 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Human-Robot Interaction (HRI).

[17]  Matthew B. Miles,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook , 1994 .

[18]  Ann L. Brown,et al.  How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. , 1999 .

[19]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  The effects of argumentation scaffolds on argumentation and problem solving , 2002 .

[20]  Kelly Y. L. Ku,et al.  Assessing Students' Critical Thinking Performance: Urging for Measurements Using Multi-Response Format. , 2009 .

[21]  W. D. Li,et al.  Advances in collaborative CAD: the-state-of-the art , 2005, Comput. Aided Des..

[22]  Daniel A. Keim.  Exploring Big Data using Visual Analytics , 2014, EDBT/ICDT Workshops.

[23]  Carlo P. Magno,et al.  The role of metacognitive skills in developing critical thinking , 2010 .

[24]  Emel Ültanir,et al.  An Epistemologic Glance at the Constructivist Approach : Constructivist Learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori , 2011 .

[25]  R. Paul,et al.  Critical Thinking: Competency Standards Essential to the Cultivation of Intellectual Skills, Part 4 , 2012 .

[26]  N. Denzin,et al.  The SAGE handbook of qualitative research , 2005 .

[27]  Richard Paul,et al.  The Thinker's Guide to Engineering Reasoning , 2013 .

[28]  S. Merriam.  Qualitative Case Studies , 2010 .

[29]  R. Paul,et al.  Critical Thinking: The Art of Socratic Questioning , 2007 .

[30]  Elliot P. Douglas.  Work in progress: What is critical thinking? , 2012, 2012 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings.

[31]  Matthew Stephens,et al.  Visualizing spatial population structure with estimated effective migration surfaces , 2014, Nature Genetics.

[32]  Renata Lis,et al.  ROLE OF VISUALIZATION IN ENGINEERING EDUCATION , 2014 .

[33]  Jeffrey Heer,et al.  Narrative Visualization: Telling Stories with Data , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[34]  S. Simon,et al.  Mapping Children’s Discussions of Evidence in Science to Assess Collaboration and Argumentation , 2006 .

[35]  P. Ralston,et al.  Enhancing Critical Thinking across the Undergraduate Experience: An Exemplar from Engineering. , 2013 .

[36]  Katherine L. McNeill,et al.  A learning progression for scientific argumentation: Understanding student work and designing supportive instructional contexts , 2010 .

[37]  D. Sackett,et al.  Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't , 1996, BMJ.

[38]  Linda C. Schmidt,et al.  Predicting creative problem solving in engineering design , 2016 .

[39]  Jennifer Mangold,et al.  The engineering design process as a problem solving and learning tool in K-12 classrooms , 2013 .

[40]  Stuart Naylor,et al.  Constructivism in Classroom: Theory into Practice , 1999 .

[41]  A. McKee.  Textual Analysis: A Beginner's Guide , 2003 .

[42]  L.J. Leifer,et al.  Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning , 2005, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[43]  K. Crowley,et al.  Designing for Science: Implications from Everyday, Classroom, and Professional Settings. , 2001 .

[44]  Christopher P. Dwyer,et al.  An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century , 2014 .

[45]  Edward Rolf Tufte,et al.  The visual display of quantitative information , 1985 .

[46]  Troy D. Sadler,et al.  Informal reasoning regarding socioscientific issues: A critical review of research , 2004 .

[47]  R. Paul,et al.  Critical Thinking: Ethical Reasoning and Fairminded Thinking, Part II. , 2009 .

[48]  J. Osborne,et al.  Teaching and Learning Science as Argument , 2010 .

[49]  Innovation Shortfalls , 2007 .

[50]  Laura E. Barnes,et al.  An assessment of visualization tools for patient monitoring and medical decision making , 2015, 2015 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium.

[51]  Ann E. Loraine,et al.  Visualizing the genome: techniques for presenting human genome data and annotations , 2002, BMC Bioinformatics.

[52]  Katerina Ananiadou,et al.  21st Century Skills and Competences for New Millennium Learners in OECD Countries , 2009 .

[53]  N. Denzin.  Sociological Methods: A Sourcebook , 1978 .

[54]  Michael Hogan,et al.  The Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment and real-world outcomes: Cross-national applications , 2012 .

[55]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[56]  D. Kuhn,et al.  Developing Norms of Argumentation: Metacognitive, Epistemological, and Social Dimensions of Developing Argumentive Competence , 2013 .

[57]  P. Facione.  Critical Thinking: A Statement of Expert Consensus for Purposes of Educational Assessment and Instruction. Research Findings and Recommendations. , 1990 .

[58]  Clare Churcher,et al.  Supporting Informed Decision-Making under Uncertainty and Risk through Interactive Visualisation , 2013, AUIC.

[59]  Rebecca Ferguson,et al.  Innovating Pedagogy 2015: Open University Innovation Report 4 , 2015 .

[60]  E. Douglas.  Defining and Measuring Critical Thinking in Engineering , 2012 .

[61]  Patricia A. S. Ralston,et al.  Critical Thinking Development In Undergraduate Engineering Students From Freshman Through Senior Year: A 3-Cohort Longitudinal Study , 2015 .

[62]  Walter R. Borg,et al.  Educational research: An introduction, 6th ed. , 1996 .

[63]  Gregory J. Kelly,et al.  Epistemic levels in argument: An analysis of university oceanography students' use of evidence in writing , 2002 .

[64]  Brian J. Reiser,et al.  Engaging Students in the Scientific Practices of Explanation and Argumentation: Understanding a Framework for K-12 Science Education , 2012 .

[65]  Ben Shneiderman,et al.  Readings in information visualization - using vision to think , 1999 .