Improved lung function by means of retrograde flush in canine lung transplantation with non-heart-beating donors.

OBJECTIVE Use of lungs from non-heart-beating donors would increase the pulmonary donor pool. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of retrograde flush in canine lung transplantation from non-heart-beating donors. METHODS Left lung transplantation was performed in 12 weight-matched pairs of dogs. Donors were killed without heparinization, left at room temperature for 2 hours, and then randomized into 2 groups. In group AF (n = 6) lung retrieval was performed after flushing the lung block with low potassium dextran glucose (50 mL/kg) solution through the pulmonary artery. In group AF+RF (n = 6) additional retrograde flushing (low potassium dextran glucose, 25 mL/kg) was performed through the left atrium before retrieval. Flushed solution was sampled at intervals to measure hemoglobin concentrations. The lungs were preserved at 4 degrees C for 2 hours, and the left lung was implanted to the recipient being subjected to a total ischemic time of 5 hours. After left lung transplantation, the right pulmonary artery and main bronchus were ligated. Lung function, including arterial blood gas and pulmonary hemodynamics, was measured for 3 hours. For lung function study, statistical analyses were performed by using 1-way analysis of variance with repeated measures. RESULTS Group AF+RF had significantly better gas exchange and lower wet/dry weight ratio of the transplanted lung than group AF. Changes of hemoglobin concentration in the flushed solution indicated that additional retrograde flush could remove residual microthrombi after antegrade flush. CONCLUSIONS This study supports the theory that additional retrograde flush improves lung function after lung transplantation by removing residual pulmonary microthrombi in the lungs of non-heart-beating donors.

[1]  J. Hohlfeld,et al.  Surfactant function in lung transplantation after 24 hours of ischemia: advantage of retrograde flush perfusion for preservation. , 2002, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[2]  S. Steen,et al.  Transplantation of lungs from a non-heart-beating donor , 2001, The Lancet.

[3]  M. Aoe,et al.  Short-term inhaled nitric oxide in canine lung transplantation from non-heart-beating donor. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[4]  M. Sarsam Preimplantation retrograde pneumoplegia in clinical lung transplantation. , 1999, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[5]  S. Luh,et al.  The effects of inhaled nitric oxide, gabexate mesilate, and retrograde flush in the lung graft from non-heart beating minipig donors. , 1999, Transplantation.

[6]  S. Steen,et al.  Gas exchange function one month after transplantation of lungs topically cooled for 2 hours in the non-heart-beating cadaver after failed resuscitation. , 1999, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[7]  M. Aoe,et al.  Effects of inhaled nitric oxide in canine lung transplantation from non-heart-beating donor. , 1998, The Japanese journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official publication of the Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery = Nihon Kyobu Geka Gakkai zasshi.

[8]  G. Téllez,et al.  Early lung allograft function after retrograde and antegrade preservation. , 1997, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[9]  S. Steen,et al.  Successful transplantation of lungs topically cooled in the non-heart-beating donor for 6 hours. , 1997, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[10]  W. Dyckman,et al.  Retrograde versus antegrade flush in canine left lung preservation for six hours. , 1996, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[11]  T. Egan,et al.  Donor lungs from ventilated cadavers: impart of a free radical scavenger. , 1996, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[12]  M. Aoe,et al.  Improved lung function by urokinase infusion in canine lung transplantation using non-heart-beating donors. , 1995, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[13]  F. Beyersdorf,et al.  Distribution of lung preservation solutions in parenchyma and airways: influence of atelectasis and route of delivery. , 1995, The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation.

[14]  B. Wilcox,et al.  Cadaver lung donors: effect of preharvest ventilation on graft function. , 1993, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  O. H. Lowry,et al.  Evaluation of lung metabolism during successful twenty-four-hour canine lung preservation. , 1993, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[16]  B. Wilcox,et al.  A strategy to increase the donor pool: use of cadaver lungs for transplantation. , 1991, The Annals of thoracic surgery.