Laypeople's conceptions of commitment.

The author conducted 8 studies to elucidate the content and structure of lay conceptions of commitment. Studies 1 to 5 revealed that laypeople regard commitment to close relationships (e.g., friends, family, spouse) as central to the concept, whereas they consider nonclose (e.g., commitment to a neighbor) and noninterpersonal varieties (e.g., one's occupation) peripheral. This prototype structure influenced information processing in predictable ways. Studies 6 to 8 focused on the vertical structure of commitment categories. Results suggest that types of commitment are organized as fuzzy rather than true class-inclusion hierarchies. Study 8 also examined relationship implications of conceptions of commitment. People who held a relational conception of commitment had more positive perceptions, thoughts, and feelings about their dating relationship than did those who held a nonrelational conception.

[1]  James A. Russell,et al.  The Concept of Love Viewed From a Prototype Perspective , 1991 .

[2]  F. Moore Cognitive development and the acquisition of language , 1973 .

[3]  E. Rosch,et al.  Categorization of Natural Objects , 1981 .

[4]  H. Becker Notes on the Concept of Commitment , 1960, American Journal of Sociology.

[5]  Rosabeth Moss Kanter,et al.  Commitment and Community: Communes and Utopias in Sociological Perspective , 1972 .

[6]  G. Fletcher,et al.  Cognition in Close Relationships , 1992 .

[7]  Caryl E. Rusbult,et al.  Satisfaction and commitment in friendships. , 1980 .

[8]  J. Russell,et al.  Concept of Emotion Viewed From a Prototype Perspective , 1984 .

[9]  M. Chandler,et al.  Wisdom: Explorations in Adult Competence , 1986 .

[10]  Douglas L. Medin,et al.  Of cabbages and kings: Assessing the extendibility of natural object concept models to social things. , 1984 .

[11]  Garth J. O. Fletcher,et al.  Knowledge structures in close relationships : a social psychological approach , 1996 .

[12]  C. Rusbult American Psychological Association, Inc. A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Development (and Deterioration) of Satisfaction and Commitment in Heterosexual Involvements , 2022 .

[13]  E. Rosch Cognitive Representations of Semantic Categories. , 1975 .

[14]  C. Rusbult,et al.  A Longitudinal Test of the Investment Model: The Impact on Job Satisfaction, Job Commitment, and Turnover of Variations in Rewards, Costs, Alternatives, and Investments , 1983 .

[15]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[16]  S. Duck,et al.  Individuals in relationships , 1993 .

[17]  Caryl E. Rusbult,et al.  Exchange variables as predictors of job satisfaction, job commitment, and turnover: The impact of rewards, costs, alternatives, and investments. , 1981 .

[18]  Beverley Fehr,et al.  Prototype‐based assessment of laypeople's views of love , 1994 .

[19]  T. K. Srull,et al.  Handbook of Social Cognition , 1993 .

[20]  G. Schwartz,et al.  Love and Commitment , 1980 .

[21]  E. Rosch,et al.  Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.

[22]  Lawrence M. Ward,et al.  Prototypicality of emotions: A reaction time study , 1982 .

[23]  Catherine A. Surra Reasons for Changes in Commitment: Variations by Courtship Type , 1987 .

[24]  W. Mischel,et al.  Prototypes in Person Perception1 , 1979 .

[25]  G. Spanier,et al.  Commitment — An Overlooked Variable in Marital Adjustment? , 1974 .