Contextual Effects in the Interpretations of Probability Words: Perceived Base Rate and Severity of Events

Previous research has demonstrated substantial effects of context on the numerical interpretation of verbal probability statements and has attributed these effects to the perceived base-rate probability of the predicted events. These context effects are shown to be attributable to the perceived severity of the predicted event as well as to the perceived base rate. Furthermore, there is evidence for strong context effects that are not explained by either of these 2 variables. The implications of these results for the use of probability statements in the communication of verbal probability information are discussed.

[1]  Wayne F. Cascio,et al.  Magnitude estimations of expressions of frequency and amount. , 1974 .

[2]  K. Hodgkin.  Towards earlier diagnosis in primary care , 1978 .

[3]  L. N. Kanal,et al.  Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 5 , 1990 .

[4]  G R Norman,et al.  Expressions of probability: words and numbers. , 1980, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  Alf Zimmer,et al.  Verbal Vs. Numerical Processing of Subjective Probabilities , 1983 .

[6]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Timed magnitude comparisons of numerical and nonnumerical expressions of uncertainty , 1989, Memory & cognition.

[7]  D. Ellsberg.  Decision, probability, and utility: Risk, ambiguity, and the Savage axioms , 1961 .

[8]  O Svenson,et al.  A unifying interpretation of different models for the integration of information when evaluating gambles. , 1975, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[9]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The Concepts of a Linguistic Variable and its Application to Approximate Reasoning , 1975 .

[10]  Geoffrey R. Norman,et al.  Expressions of probability: words and numbers. , 1980 .

[11]  Norman H. Anderson,et al.  Test of a conflict model for preference judgment , 1969 .

[12]  Sarah Lichtenstein,et al.  Empirical scaling of common verbal phrases associated with numerical probabilities , 1967 .

[13]  Amnon Rapoport,et al.  Measuring the Vague Meanings of Probability Terms , 1986 .

[14]  Norbert Schwarz,et al.  What triggers causal attributions? The impact of valence and subjective probability. , 1988 .

[15]  Ola Svenson,et al.  Risks of road transportation in a psychological perspective , 1978 .

[16]  David V. Budescu,et al.  Decisions based on numerically and verbally expressed uncertainties. , 1988 .

[17]  John Fox,et al.  Three Arguments for Extending the Framework of Probability , 1985, UAI.

[18]  D. Coutu,et al.  The battle over abortion. , 1981, Time.

[19]  B. Cohen.  The Effect of Outcome Desirability on Comparisons of Numerical and Linguistic Probabilities , 1986 .

[20]  Thomas S. Wallsten,et al.  Base rate effects on the interpretations of probability and frequency expressions , 1986 .

[21]  L. Shulman,et al.  Medical Problem Solving: An Analysis of Clinical Reasoning , 1978 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment , 1983 .

[23]  W. Kintsch,et al.  Memory and cognition , 1977 .

[24]  Rakesh K. Sarin,et al.  Lottery dependent utility , 1987 .

[25]  Rami Zwick,et al.  The Evaluation of Verbal Models , 1988, Int. J. Man Mach. Stud..

[26]  Louis Narens,et al.  Classification of concatenation measurement structures according to scale type , 1985 .

[27]  R. Hogarth,et al.  Ambiguity and Uncertainty in Probabilistic Inference. , 1985 .

[28]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning-III , 1975, Inf. Sci..

[29]  T. Fine,et al.  The Emergence of Probability , 1976 .