Periradicular Infiltration of the Cervical Spine: How New CT Scanner Techniques and Protocol Modifications Contribute to the Achievement of Low-Dose Interventions

Abstract Purpose CT-guided periradicular infiltration of the cervical spine is an effective symptomatic treatment in patients with radiculopathy-associated pain syndromes. This study evaluates the robustness and safety of a low-dose protocol on a CT scanner with iterative reconstruction software. Materials and Methods A total of 183 patients who underwent periradicular infiltration therapy of the cervical spine were included in this study. 82 interventions were performed on a new CT scanner with a new intervention protocol using an iterative reconstruction algorithm. Spot scanning was implemented for planning and a basic low-dose setup of 80 kVp and 5 mAs was established during intermittent fluoroscopy. The comparison group included 101 prior interventions on a scanner without iterative reconstruction. The dose-length product (DLP), number of acquisitions, pain reduction on a numeric analog scale, and protocol changes to achieve a safe intervention were recorded. Results The median DLP for the whole intervention was 24.3 mGy*cm in the comparison group and 1.8 mGy*cm in the study group. The median pain reduction was –3 in the study group and –2 in the comparison group. A 5 mAs increase in the tube current-time product was required in 5 patients of the study group. Conclusion Implementation of a new scanner and intervention protocol resulted in a 92.6 % dose reduction without a compromise in safety and pain relief. The dose needed here is more than 75 % lower than doses used for similar interventions in published studies. An increase of the tube current-time product was needed in only 6 % of interventions. Key Points:  The presented ultra-low-dose protocol allows for a significant dose reduction without compromising outcome. The protocol includes spot scanning for planning purposes and a basic setup of 80 kVp and 5 mAs. The iterative reconstruction algorithm is activated during fluoroscopy. Citation Format Elsholtz FH, Kamp JE, Vahldiek JL et al. Periradicular Infiltration of the Cervical Spine: How New CT Scanner Techniques and Protocol Modifications Contribute to the Achievement of Low-Dose Interventions. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2019; 191: 54 – 61

[1]  B. Hamm,et al.  Ultra-low-dose periradicular infiltration of the lumbar spine: spot scanning and its potential for further dose reduction by replacing helical planning CT , 2017, La radiologia medica.

[2]  B. Hamm,et al.  Periradicular infiltration of the lumbar spine: testing the robustness of an interventional ultra-low-dose protocol at different body mass index levels , 2017, Acta radiologica.

[3]  W. Palmer Spinal Injections for Pain Management. , 2016, Radiology.

[4]  J. Y. Lee,et al.  Effect of Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection: Analysis According to the Neck Pain Patterns and MRI Findings , 2016, The Korean journal of pain.

[5]  N. Paik Radiation Dose Reduction in CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection by Modifying Scout and Planning Steps , 2016, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[6]  C. Cagnon,et al.  Radiation-Induced Cataractogenesis: A Critical Literature Review for the Interventional Radiologist , 2016, CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology.

[7]  S. Thurnher,et al.  Periradikuläre Infiltrationstherapie , 2015, Der Radiologe.

[8]  Jongseok Lee,et al.  Cervical Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection for Unilateral Cervical Radiculopathy: Comparison of Midline and Paramedian Approaches for Efficacy , 2015, Korean journal of radiology.

[9]  K. Kabir,et al.  CT-guided infiltration saves surgical intervention and fastens return to work compared to anatomical landmark-guided infiltration in patients with lumbosciatica , 2015, European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology.

[10]  Ronald L. White,et al.  Epidural Steroid Injections, Conservative Treatment, or Combination Treatment for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Multicenter, Randomized, Comparative-effectiveness Study , 2014, Anesthesiology.

[11]  Dianna D. Cody,et al.  Standardization and optimization of CT protocols to achieve low dose. , 2014, Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR.

[12]  Patrik Rogalla,et al.  Iterative reconstruction algorithm for CT: can radiation dose be decreased while low-contrast detectability is preserved? , 2013, Radiology.

[13]  J. Steurer,et al.  Access routes and reported decision criteria for lumbar epidural drug injections: a systematic literature review , 2013, Skeletal Radiology.

[14]  M. Pech,et al.  Prospective Evaluation of the Radiologist’s Hand Dose in CT-Guided Interventions , 2013, RöFo - Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Röntgenstrahlen und der bildgebenden Verfahren.

[15]  W. Huda,et al.  Accuracy of CT guidance of lumbar facet joint block. , 2013, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[16]  Arnold M. R. Schilham,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography part 2: initial results in dose reduction and image quality , 2013, European Radiology.

[17]  B. Hamm,et al.  Cost comparison of nerve root infiltration of the lumbar spine under MRI and CT guidance , 2013, European Radiology.

[18]  Arnold M. R. Schilham,et al.  Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: Technical principles , 2013, European Radiology.

[19]  Eric J. Hall,et al.  Cancer risks from diagnostic radiology: the impact of new epidemiological data. , 2012, The British journal of radiology.

[20]  J. Hoang,et al.  CT Fluoroscopy-Guided Cervical Interlaminar Steroid Injections: Safety, Technique, and Radiation Dose Parameters , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[21]  Jacques Felblinger,et al.  CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT , 2012, European Radiology.

[22]  A. Stout Epidural steroid injections for cervical radiculopathy. , 2011, Physical medicine and rehabilitation clinics of North America.

[23]  D. Brenner,et al.  Computed tomography--an increasing source of radiation exposure. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[24]  R. M. Sievert,et al.  RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION ON RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION , 1959 .

[25]  J. Harrison,et al.  Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review. , 2016, The British journal of radiology.

[26]  Walter Huda,et al.  Volume CT dose index and dose-length product displayed during CT: what good are they? , 2011, Radiology.

[27]  J. Valentin,et al.  The 2007 Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 103. , 2007, Annals of the ICRP.