Roadmap to fully-digital PET/CT scanners

The ever-increasing needs of molecular imaging now require significant upgrade of conventional PET and CT scanners. Upcoming research protocols ask for low doses, submillimeter resolution, high sensitivity and multimodality. Current scanner technologies are mainly based on analog ASICs having a long design-cycle which hinders rapid scanner improvements and can hardly keep up with the new requirements of biomedical research. With new high-speed processors and configurable electronics, combined with early digitization of the signals from detectors, digital signal processing can flexibly and concurrently deal with many of those requirements. The present paper highlights past, present and foreseen developments in PET/CT signal processing. In particular, different model fits, filtered interpolation and neural networks are compared for timestamping and pulse shape discrimination. Recursive (ARMAX, AR...) and non recursive (Wiener, Fast Fourier transforms, Wavelets...) filtering are compared for crystal identification. Advanced pile-up correction, baseline restoration and energy measurement in photon-counting CT are also discussed. Finally, new techniques dealing with realtime event processing for Compton-scatter LOR computation and alternate random estimation will be briefly introduced. Pros and cons of each method are discussed and the best methods identified for a roadmap to fully digital PET/CT scanning is presented.

[1]  W C Eckelman,et al.  Experiment assessment of mass effects in the rat: implications for small animal PET imaging. , 2004, Nuclear medicine and biology.

[2]  Roger Lecomte,et al.  Investigation of the LabPET™ detector and electronics for photon-counting CT imaging , 2007 .

[3]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Experimental results of identification and vector quantization algorithms for DOI measurement in digital PET scanners with phoswich detectors , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[4]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Digital signal processing applied to crystal identification in Positron Emission Tomography dedicated to small animals , 2007 .

[5]  R. Fontaine,et al.  High Rate Photon Counting CT Using Parallel Digital PET Electronics , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[6]  Roger N. Gunn,et al.  Pharmacological constraints associated with positron emission tomographic scanning of small laboratory animals , 1998, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[7]  S. Cherry,et al.  A study of inter-crystal scatter in small scintillator arrays designed for high resolution PET imaging , 1995, 1995 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference Record.

[8]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Time determination of BGO-APD detectors by digital signal processing for positron emission tomography , 2003, 2003 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record (IEEE Cat. No.03CH37515).

[9]  William W. Moses,et al.  Algorithms to identify detector Compton scatter in PET modules , 1996 .

[10]  R. Fontaine,et al.  System Integration of the LabPET Small Animal PET Scanner , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[11]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Crystal identification based on recursive-least-squares and least-mean-squares autoregressive models for small animal PET , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[12]  G. Anton,et al.  The influence of energy weighting on X-ray imaging quality , 2004 .

[13]  M. Rafecas,et al.  Characterization and processing of inter-crystal scatter in a dual layer, high resolution LSO-APD-PET , 2001, 2001 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record (Cat. No.01CH37310).

[14]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Design and performance of 0.18-/spl mu/m CMOS charge preamplifiers for APD-based PET scanners , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[15]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Time Discrimination Techniques Using Artificial Neural Networks for Positron Emission Tomography , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[16]  Horst Halling,et al.  Pulse shape discrimination of LSO and LuYAP scintillators for depth of interaction detection in PET , 2002 .

[17]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Timing Improvement by Low-Pass Filtering and Linear Interpolation for the LabPET Scanner , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[18]  Magdalena Rafecas,et al.  Estimating accidental coincidences for pixelated PET detectors and singles list-mode acquisition , 2007 .

[19]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Crystal Identification Based on Recursive-Least-Squares and Least-Mean-Squares Auto-Regressive Models for Small Animal Pet , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[20]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Real Time Implementation of a Wiener Filter Based Crystal Identification Algorithm for Photon Counting CT Imaging , 2006, 2006 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[21]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Sensitivity in PET: Neural networks as an alternative to compton photons LOR analysis , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.

[22]  R. Fontaine,et al.  Timing improvement by low-pass filtering and linear interpolation for the LabPETTM scanner , 2007, 2007 15th IEEE-NPSS Real-Time Conference.

[23]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Inter-crystal scatter in a dual layer, high resolution LSO-APD positron emission tomograph. , 2003, Physics in medicine and biology.

[24]  S. Boyden,et al.  Adaptive response and its variation in human normal and tumour cells. , 1999, International journal of radiation biology.

[25]  R. Fontaine,et al.  The architecture of LabPET/spl trade/, a small animal APD-based digital PET scanner , 2005, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005.

[26]  R. Fontaine,et al.  ULTRA-Fast wiener filter based crystal identification algorithm applied to the LabPETTM phoswich detectors , 2007, 2007 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record.