Technology-Assisted Learning and Learning Style: A Longitudinal Field Experiment

From a student's perspective, technology-assisted learning provides convenient access to interactive contents in a hyperlinked multimedia environment that allows increased control over the pace and timing of the presented material. Previous research examining different aspects of technology-assisted learning has found equivocal results concerning its effectiveness and outcomes. We extend prior studies by conducting a longitudinal field experiment to compare technology-assisted with face-to-face learning for students' learning of English. Our comparative investigation focuses on learning effectiveness, perceived course learnability, learning-community support, and learning satisfaction. In addition, we analyze the effects of different learning styles in moderating the effectiveness of and satisfaction with technology-assisted learning. Overall, our results show significantly greater learning effectiveness with technology-assisted learning than with conventional face-to-face learning. Learning style has noticeable influences on the effectiveness and outcomes of technology-assisted learning. We also observe an apparently important interaction effect with the medium for delivery, which may partially explain the equivocal results of previous research.

[1]  Ofelia R. Nikolova,et al.  Influence of gender and academic ability in a computer‐based Spanish reading task , 2004 .

[2]  Michael Newby,et al.  An Empirical Study Comparing the Learning Environments of Open and Closed Computer Laboratories , 2002, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[3]  Susan M. Montgomery Addressing diverse learning styles through the use of multimedia , 1995, Proceedings Frontiers in Education 1995 25th Annual Conference. Engineering Education for the 21st Century.

[4]  Sergio Bermejo,et al.  Cooperative electronic learning in virtual laboratories through forums , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[5]  Yoram Neumann,et al.  Predicting Juniors’ and Seniors’ Persistence and Attrition , 1989 .

[6]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Learning with Technology: A Constructivist Perspective , 1998 .

[7]  Vicki Blum Cohen Interactive Features in the Design of Videodisc Materials , 1984 .

[8]  Simon Wilmot,et al.  Can multimedia meet tertiary educational needs better than the conventional lecture? A case study , 2001 .

[9]  Leon E. Panetta The Importance of Foreign Language Study. , 1979 .

[10]  Maryam Alavi,et al.  Computer-Mediated Collaborative Learning: An Empirical Evaluation , 1994, MIS Q..

[11]  Kathy A. Beerman Computer-based Multimedia: New Directions in Teaching and Learning , 1996 .

[12]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Exploratory research on the role of national and professional cultures in a distributed learning project , 2001 .

[13]  Susanne Bødker,et al.  Design for Learning in Use , 2000, Scand. J. Inf. Syst..

[14]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[15]  Katy Campbell,et al.  The promise of computer-based learning: designing for inclusivity , 1999, IEEE Technol. Soc. Mag..

[16]  S. Codone Reducing the distance: a study of course websites as a means to create a total learning space in traditional courses , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[17]  Wei-Fan Chen Effect of web-browsing interfaces in web-based instruction: a quantitative study , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[18]  Wen Jia Rong,et al.  The effects of learning style and flow experience on the effectiveness of e-learning , 2005, Fifth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT'05).

[19]  Fadi P. Deek,et al.  Innovation and education in the digital age: reconciling the roles of pedagogy, technology, and the business of learning , 2003, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[20]  T.L. Hein,et al.  Teaching to students' learning styles: approaches that work , 1999, FIE'99 Frontiers in Education. 29th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference. Designing the Future of Science and Engineering Education. Conference Proceedings (IEEE Cat. No.99CH37011.

[21]  Michael J. Prince,et al.  Does Active Learning Work? A Review of the Research , 2004 .

[22]  P. Rosati,et al.  A study of the relationship between students' learning styles and instructors' lecture styles , 1988 .

[23]  Douglas R. Vogel,et al.  Will virtual education initiatives succeed? , 2000, Inf. Technol. Manag..

[24]  Yuliang Liu,et al.  Cognitive Styles and Distance Education. , 1999 .

[25]  C. Baltes The E-learning balancing act: training and education with multimedia , 2001, IEEE MultiMedia.

[26]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  The Influence of Learning Style Preferences on Student Success in Online Versus Face-to-Face Environments , 2002, WebNet.

[27]  Patricia E. Simmons,et al.  The Effects of CAI and Hands-On Activities on Elementary Students' Attitudes and Weather Knowledge , 1992 .

[28]  Thomas Abraham,et al.  Evaluating the Virtual Management Information Systems (MIS) Classroom , 2002, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[29]  James C. Spohrer,et al.  Learner-centered education , 1996, CACM.

[30]  D. Clements Enhancement of Creativity in Computer Environments , 1991 .

[31]  Nian-Shing Chen,et al.  Assessment of E-Learning Satisfaction from Critical Incidents Perspective , 2004, ICEIS.

[32]  M.-P. Huguet,et al.  Designing for the changing role of the instructor in blended learning , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[33]  Dante Del Corso,et al.  A teacher friendly environment to foster learner-centered customization in the development of interactive educational packages , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[34]  Blake Ives,et al.  Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effectiveness in Basic It Skills Training Author(s): Piccoli Et Al./web-based Virtual Learning Environments Web-based Virtual Learning Environments: a Research Framework and a Preliminary Assessment of Effe , 2022 .

[35]  R. Felder,et al.  Learning and Teaching Styles In Foreign and Second Language Education , 1995 .

[36]  Norito Kawakami,et al.  Effects of Web‐Based Psychoeducation on Self‐Efficacy, Problem Solving Behavior, Stress Responses and Job Satisfaction among Workers: A Controlled Clinical Trial , 2005, Journal of occupational health.

[37]  Robert Ubell Engineers turn to e-learning , 2000 .

[38]  D. Budny,et al.  Learning styles in the classroom: approaches to enhance student motivation and learning , 2005, 2005 6th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training.

[39]  Curtis A. Carver,et al.  Enhancing student learning through hypermedia courseware and incorporation of student learning styles , 1999 .

[40]  R. Clark Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[41]  Irwin M. Rubin,et al.  Organizational Behavior: An Experiential Approach , 1994 .

[42]  Scott D. Johnson,et al.  Comparative analysis of learner satisfaction and learning outcomes in online and face-to-face learning environments , 2000 .

[43]  Susan M. Powers,et al.  Student Perceptions and Performance in a Virtual Classroom Environment , 1997 .

[44]  S. Kim MacGregor,et al.  Hypermedia Navigation Profiles: Cognitive Characteristics and Information Processing Strategies , 1999 .

[45]  N. K. Muir,et al.  The Richness Imperative and Cognitive Style , 1990 .

[46]  Theo J. Bastiaens,et al.  The impact of intrinsic motivation on e-learning in authentic computer tasks , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[47]  P. Reed,et al.  Evaluating Web-supported Learning Versus Lecture-based Teaching: Quantitative and Qualitative Perspectives , 2005 .

[48]  M. Allen,et al.  Comparing Student Satisfaction With Distance Education to Traditional Classrooms in Higher Education: A Meta-Analysis , 2002 .

[49]  Genie Black A Comparison of Traditional , 2005 .

[50]  Chetan S. Sankar,et al.  Identification of factors that lead to perceived learning improvements for female students , 2003, IEEE Trans. Educ..

[51]  Timothy T. Perry,et al.  University students' attitudes towards multimedia presentations , 1998, Br. J. Educ. Technol..