The importance of molecular markers and primer design when characterizing biodiversity from environmental DNA.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Eske Willerslev,et al. Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples , 2012, PloS one.
[2] Douglas B. Sponsler,et al. Application of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem , 2015, Applications in plant sciences.
[3] J. Freeland,et al. Development of species-specific primers with potential for amplifying eDNA from imperilled freshwater unionid mussels. , 2016, Genome.
[4] Kristy Deiner,et al. Special Issue Article: Environmental DNA Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA , 2015 .
[5] Anthony A Chariton,et al. Metabarcoding of benthic eukaryote communities predicts the ecological condition of estuaries. , 2015, Environmental pollution.
[6] Pierre Taberlet,et al. ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases , 2010, BMC Microbiology.
[7] E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al. Environmental DNA evidence of transfer of North Sea molluscs across tropical waters through ballast water , 2015 .
[8] Alain Viari,et al. ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis , 2011, Nucleic acids research.
[9] N. Knowlton,et al. Deep COI sequencing of standardized benthic samples unveils overlooked diversity of Jordanian coral reefs in the northern Red Sea. , 2016, Genome.
[10] Paul Nichols,et al. Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long‐term data from established survey methods , 2016, Molecular ecology.
[11] Sri Ram,et al. Exploiting extension bias in polymerase chain reaction to improve primer specificity in ensembles of nearly identical DNA templates. , 2014, Environmental Microbiology.
[12] P. Taberlet,et al. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples , 2008, Biology Letters.
[13] M. Kondoh,et al. MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.
[14] P. Hebert,et al. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[15] Matthew A. Barnes,et al. The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics , 2016, Conservation Genetics.
[16] Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al. Divergence thresholds and divergent biodiversity estimates: can metabarcoding reliably describe zooplankton communities? , 2015, Ecology and evolution.
[17] J. Amberg,et al. Improving efficiency and reliability of environmental DNA analysis for silver carp , 2015 .
[18] A. Sepulveda,et al. Potential utility of environmental DNA for early detection of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) , 2016 .
[19] Brian J. Smith,et al. Environmental DNA (eDNA) Sampling Improves Occurrence and Detection Estimates of Invasive Burmese Pythons , 2015, PloS one.
[20] J. Landry,et al. A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis , 2008, BMC Genomics.
[21] M. García‐París,et al. Phylogeography of two European newt species — discordance between mtDNA and morphology , 2005, Molecular ecology.
[22] W. John Kress,et al. A DNA barcode for land plants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[23] C. Yesson,et al. The evolutionary history and conservation value of disjunct Bartonia paniculata subsp. paniculata (Branched Bartonia) populations in Canada , 2013 .
[24] W. L. Chadderton,et al. “Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA , 2011 .
[25] Eske Willerslev,et al. Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .
[26] H. Doi,et al. Using Environmental DNA to Estimate the Distribution of an Invasive Fish Species in Ponds , 2013, PloS one.
[27] Matthew J. Colloff,et al. Ecological assessment of estuarine sediments by pyrosequencing eukaryotic ribosomal DNA , 2010 .
[28] Filip Pattyn,et al. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and other mismatches reduce performance of quantitative PCR assays. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.
[29] C. Meyer. Molecular systematics of cowries (Gastropoda: Cypraeidae) and diversification patterns in the tropics , 2003 .
[30] J. Freeland,et al. Development of species-specific environmental DNA (eDNA) markers for invasive aquatic plants , 2015 .
[31] M. Chase,et al. Barcoding of Plants and Fungi , 2009, Science.
[32] Jesse A. Port,et al. Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA , 2015, Molecular ecology.
[33] F. Altermatt,et al. Utility of Environmental DNA for Monitoring Rare and Indicator Macroinvertebrate Species , 2014, Freshwater Science.
[34] Helen C. Rees,et al. REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA – a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology , 2014 .
[35] K. Coyne,et al. Improved Methods for Capture, Extraction, and Quantitative Assay of Environmental DNA from Asian Bigheaded Carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) , 2014, PloS one.
[36] P. Hebert,et al. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. , 2005, Systematic biology.
[37] P. Taberlet,et al. Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[38] R. Giblin-Davis,et al. Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises , 2010, Molecular ecology.
[39] A. Drummond,et al. Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment , 2015, GigaScience.
[40] F. Altermatt,et al. Fishing in the Water: Effect of Sampled Water Volume on Environmental DNA-Based Detection of Macroinvertebrates. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.
[41] François Pompanon,et al. DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match , 2014, Biology Letters.
[42] L. Orlando,et al. Meta‐barcoding of ‘dirt’ DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[43] H. Doi,et al. Use of Droplet Digital PCR for Estimation of Fish Abundance and Biomass in Environmental DNA Surveys , 2015, PloS one.
[44] K. McKelvey,et al. Robust Detection of Rare Species Using Environmental DNA: The Importance of Primer Specificity , 2013, PloS one.
[45] Applications and limitations of measuring environmental DNA as indicators of the presence of aquatic animals , 2015 .
[46] Pierre Taberlet,et al. Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus , 2012 .
[47] Shanning Zhang,et al. Significant genetic boundaries and spatial dynamics of giant pandas occupying fragmented habitat across southwest China , 2011, Molecular ecology.
[48] T. Glenn,et al. Assessment of Environmental DNA for Detecting Presence of Imperiled Aquatic Amphibian Species in Isolated Wetlands , 2015 .
[49] D. Baird,et al. Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos , 2011, PloS one.
[50] Jeremy R. deWaard,et al. Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.
[51] Carsten Wiuf,et al. Diverse Plant and Animal Genetic Records from Holocene and Pleistocene Sediments , 2003, Science.
[52] E. Willerslev,et al. Characterisation of insect and plant origins using DNA extracted from small volumes of bee honey , 2010, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.
[53] P. Sorensen,et al. Optimizing techniques to capture and extract environmental DNA for detection and quantification of fish , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[54] G. Wiseman. State of the art and limitations of quantitative polymerase chain reaction. , 2002, Journal of AOAC International.
[55] E. Petit,et al. The downside of eDNA as a survey tool in water bodies , 2015 .
[56] S. Graham,et al. Discriminating plant species in a local temperate flora using the rbcL+matK DNA barcode , 2011 .
[57] A. Lambert,et al. ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[58] P. Hebert,et al. DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.
[59] W. L. Chadderton,et al. Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.
[60] P. Burkhardt-Holm,et al. An eDNA Assay to Monitor a Globally Invasive Fish Species from Flowing Freshwater , 2016, PloS one.
[61] G. Spong,et al. Browsed twig environmental DNA: diagnostic PCR to identify ungulate species , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.
[62] John L. Spouge,et al. Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[63] A blocking primer increases specificity in environmental DNA detection of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) , 2014, Conservation Genetics Resources.
[64] C. Jerde,et al. The use of environmental DNA in invasive species surveillance of the Great Lakes commercial bait trade , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.
[65] E. Bužan,et al. 20 years since the introduction of DNA barcoding: from theory to application , 2013, Journal of Applied Genetics.
[66] Susan M. Huse,et al. Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere” , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[67] T. Minamoto,et al. The use of environmental DNA of fishes as an efficient method of determining habitat connectivity , 2016 .
[68] D. Serre,et al. In silico assessment of primers for eDNA studies using PrimerTree and application to characterize the biodiversity surrounding the Cuyahoga River , 2016, Scientific Reports.
[69] James Haile,et al. Ancient and modern environmental DNA , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[70] Andrew P. Martin,et al. Comparative mtDNA phylogeography of neotropical freshwater fishes: testing shared history to infer the evolutionary landscape of lower Central America , 1998, Molecular ecology.
[71] Fabian Sievers,et al. Clustal Omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.
[72] P. Taberlet,et al. Tracking earthworm communities from soil DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[73] Adam J. Sepulveda,et al. Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) , 2013, Freshwater Science.
[74] R. Giblin-Davis,et al. Ecometagenetics confirm high tropical rainforest nematode diversity , 2010, Molecular ecology.
[75] B. Brosi,et al. Pollen DNA barcoding: current applications and future prospects. , 2016, Genome.
[76] E. Willerslev,et al. Molecular‐ and pollen‐based vegetation analysis in lake sediments from central Scandinavia , 2013, Molecular ecology.
[77] Yiyuan Li,et al. Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[78] Kristine Bohmann,et al. Tag jumps illuminated – reducing sequence‐to‐sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[79] M. Pinheiro,et al. Metabarcoding Is Powerful yet Still Blind: A Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Molecular Surveys of Seagrass Communities , 2015, PloS one.
[80] Jian Ye,et al. Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.
[81] L. Waits,et al. Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species , 2016 .
[82] T. Minamoto,et al. A basin‐scale application of environmental DNA assessment for rare endemic species and closely related exotic species in rivers: a case study of giant salamanders in Japan , 2015 .
[83] E. Boissin,et al. Design of phylum‐specific hybrid primers for DNA barcoding: addressing the need for efficient COI amplification in the Echinodermata , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.
[84] Andrew R Mahon,et al. Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.
[85] B. Deagle,et al. Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples – a case study on DNA in faeces , 2006, Frontiers in Zoology.
[86] H. MacIsaac,et al. Identifying the source of species invasions: sampling intensity vs. genetic diversity , 2008, Molecular ecology.
[87] C. Goldberg,et al. Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms , 2015 .
[88] Next generation sequencing for characterizing biodiversity: promises and challenges , 2015, Genetica.
[89] Cuong Q. Tang,et al. The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[90] Douglas W. Yu,et al. Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[91] Jonathan P. Bollback,et al. The Use of Coded PCR Primers Enables High-Throughput Sequencing of Multiple Homolog Amplification Products by 454 Parallel Sequencing , 2007, PloS one.
[92] A. Kinziger,et al. Using occupancy modelling to compare environmental DNA to traditional field methods for regional‐scale monitoring of an endangered aquatic species , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[93] W. L. Chadderton,et al. Active and passive environmental DNA surveillance of aquatic invasive species , 2016 .
[94] Erik Kristiansson,et al. The ITS region as a target for characterization of fungal communities using emerging sequencing technologies. , 2009, FEMS microbiology letters.
[95] K. Katoh,et al. MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.
[96] J. MacKay,et al. Evaluation of the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms and primer mismatches on quantitative PCR , 2009, BMC biotechnology.
[97] P. Taberlet,et al. Glacial Survival of Boreal Trees in Northern Scandinavia , 2012, Science.
[98] K. McKelvey,et al. DNA barcoding at riverscape scales: assessing biodiversity among fishes of the genus Cottus (Teleostei) in northern Rocky Mountain streams , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.
[99] François Pompanon,et al. An In silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes , 2010, BMC Genomics.
[100] P. Taberlet,et al. Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[101] Jesse A. Port,et al. Using Environmental DNA to Census Marine Fishes in a Large Mesocosm , 2014, PloS one.
[102] D. Baird,et al. Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers , 2016, PloS one.
[103] J. Darling,et al. Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[104] Holly M. Bik,et al. Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.
[105] P. Lim,et al. DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines , 2015, Bulletin of Entomological Research.
[106] M. Miya,et al. Environmental DNA as a ‘Snapshot’ of Fish Distribution: A Case Study of Japanese Jack Mackerel in Maizuru Bay, Sea of Japan , 2016, PloS one.
[107] C. Wiuf,et al. Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[108] L. Waits,et al. Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in a hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) monitoring program , 2015 .
[109] Z. Kawabata,et al. Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA , 2012, Limnology.
[110] Patrick D. Schloss,et al. Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies , 2011, PloS one.
[111] R. Crozier,et al. A fuzzy‐set‐theory‐based approach to analyse species membership in DNA barcoding , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[112] N. Pace,et al. Microbial ecology and evolution: a ribosomal RNA approach. , 1986, Annual review of microbiology.
[113] L. Weyrich,et al. Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.
[114] Environmental DNA as an effective tool for detection of imperiled fishes , 2015, Environmental Biology of Fishes.
[115] A. Weeks,et al. I Environmental DNA sampling is more sensitive than a traditional survey technique for detecting an aquatic invader. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.
[116] G. Ficetola,et al. Population genetics reveals origin and number of founders in a biological invasion , 2008, Molecular ecology.
[117] R. Massengill,et al. An evaluation of target specificity and sensitivity of three qPCR assays for detecting environmental DNA from Northern Pike (Esox lucius) , 2015, Conservation Genetics Resources.
[118] M. Thomas P. Gilbert,et al. Screening mammal biodiversity using DNA from leeches , 2012, Current Biology.
[119] G. Moyer,et al. History, applications, methodological issues and perspectives for the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) in marine and freshwater environments. , 2014, Revista de biologia tropical.
[120] Eoin L. Brodie,et al. Loss of Bacterial Diversity during Antibiotic Treatment of Intubated Patients Colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.
[121] Peter Haase,et al. First audit of macroinvertebrate samples from an EU Water Framework Directive monitoring program: human error greatly lowers precision of assessment results , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.
[122] R. Danovaro,et al. Unveiling the Biodiversity of Deep-Sea Nematodes through Metabarcoding: Are We Ready to Bypass the Classical Taxonomy? , 2015, PloS one.
[123] K. McKelvey,et al. The Dual Challenges of Generality and Specificity When Developing Environmental DNA Markers for Species and Subspecies of Oncorhynchus , 2015, PloS one.
[124] Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al. Next‐generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research , 2012, Molecular ecology.
[125] Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al. Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol , 2012, BMC Ecology.
[126] L. Baillie,et al. Using DNA Metabarcoding to Identify the Floral Composition of Honey: A New Tool for Investigating Honey Bee Foraging Preferences , 2015, PloS one.
[127] V. Ranwez,et al. A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.
[128] Phylogeographic inferences from chloroplast DNA: quantifying the effects of mutations in repetitive and non‐repetitive sequences , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.
[129] E. E. Sigsgaard,et al. Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples , 2015 .
[130] W. L. Chadderton,et al. Detection of Asian carp DNA as part of a Great Lakes basin-wide surveillance program , 2013 .
[131] P. Taberlet,et al. Next‐generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology.
[132] M. M. Coelho,et al. Mitochondrial DNA variation in the highly endangered cyprinid fish Anaecypris hispanica: importance for conservation , 2001, Heredity.
[133] A. Maruyama,et al. Techniques for the practical collection of environmental DNA: filter selection, preservation, and extraction , 2015, Limnology.
[134] K. McKelvey,et al. Sampling large geographic areas for rare species using environmental DNA: a study of bull trout Salvelinus confluentus occupancy in western Montana. , 2016, Journal of fish biology.
[135] J. McLachlan,et al. Ancient DNA from lake sediments: Bridging the gap between paleoecology and genetics , 2011, BMC Evolutionary Biology.
[136] J. Finarelli,et al. An eDNA assay for Irish Petromyzon marinus and Salmo trutta and field validation in running water. , 2015, Journal of fish biology.
[137] M. Schlaepfer,et al. Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. , 2014 .
[138] Douglas W. Yu,et al. Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. , 2013, Ecology letters.
[139] L. Bernatchez,et al. Improving herpetological surveys in eastern North America using the environmental DNA method. , 2016, Genome.
[140] L. Weyrich,et al. Comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and conventional fish survey methods in a river system , 2016 .
[141] Robert S. Arkle,et al. Molecular Detection of Vertebrates in Stream Water: A Demonstration Using Rocky Mountain Tailed Frogs and Idaho Giant Salamanders , 2011, PloS one.
[142] C. Goldberg,et al. Characterizing the distribution of an endangered salmonid using environmental DNA analysis , 2015 .
[143] Nancy Knowlton,et al. DNA barcoding and metabarcoding of standardized samples reveal patterns of marine benthic diversity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
[144] J. Piñol,et al. Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high‐throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.
[145] Aurélien Ginolhac,et al. A comparative study of ancient environmental DNA to pollen and macrofossils from lake sediments reveals taxonomic overlap and additional plant taxa , 2013 .
[146] A. Piaggio,et al. Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.
[147] Akifumi S. Tanabe,et al. Comparative study of the validity of three regions of the 18S‐rRNA gene for massively parallel sequencing‐based monitoring of the planktonic eukaryote community , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.
[148] D. Lodge,et al. Estimating species richness using environmental DNA , 2016, Ecology and evolution.
[149] B. Faircloth,et al. Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces , 2012, Nucleic acids research.
[150] Satoshi Yamamoto,et al. Use of environmental DNA to survey the distribution of an invasive submerged plant in ponds , 2016, Freshwater Science.
[151] D. Lodge,et al. Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA , 2014, bioRxiv.
[152] J. Freeland,et al. Molecular Ecology: Freeland/Molecular Ecology , 2011 .
[153] J. Good,et al. Targeted capture in evolutionary and ecological genomics , 2016, Molecular ecology.