The importance of molecular markers and primer design when characterizing biodiversity from environmental DNA.

Environmental DNA (eDNA) comprises DNA fragments that have been shed into the environment by organisms, and which can be extracted from environmental samples such as water or soil. Characterization of eDNA can allow researchers to infer the presence or absence of species from a particular site without the need to locate and identify individuals, and therefore may provide an extremely valuable tool for quantifying biodiversity. However, as is often the case with relatively new protocols, methodological challenges remain. A number of earlier reviews have discussed these challenges, but none have provided extensive treatment of the critical decisions surrounding molecular markers and primer development for use in eDNA assays. This review discusses a number of options and approaches that can be used when determining which primers and gene regions are most appropriate for either targeted species detection or metabarcoding macro-organisms from eDNA. The latter represents a new field that is growing rapidly, and which has the potential to revolutionize future assessments of community and ecosystem diversity.

[1]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Detection of a Diverse Marine Fish Fauna Using Environmental DNA from Seawater Samples , 2012, PloS one.

[2]  Douglas B. Sponsler,et al.  Application of ITS2 metabarcoding to determine the provenance of pollen collected by honey bees in an agroecosystem , 2015, Applications in plant sciences.

[3]  J. Freeland,et al.  Development of species-specific primers with potential for amplifying eDNA from imperilled freshwater unionid mussels. , 2016, Genome.

[4]  Kristy Deiner,et al.  Special Issue Article: Environmental DNA Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA , 2015 .

[5]  Anthony A Chariton,et al.  Metabarcoding of benthic eukaryote communities predicts the ecological condition of estuaries. , 2015, Environmental pollution.

[6]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  ITS as an environmental DNA barcode for fungi: an in silico approach reveals potential PCR biases , 2010, BMC Microbiology.

[7]  E. Garcia-Vazquez,et al.  Environmental DNA evidence of transfer of North Sea molluscs across tropical waters through ballast water , 2015 .

[8]  Alain Viari,et al.  ecoPrimers: inference of new DNA barcode markers from whole genome sequence analysis , 2011, Nucleic acids research.

[9]  N. Knowlton,et al.  Deep COI sequencing of standardized benthic samples unveils overlooked diversity of Jordanian coral reefs in the northern Red Sea. , 2016, Genome.

[10]  Paul Nichols,et al.  Environmental DNA metabarcoding of lake fish communities reflects long‐term data from established survey methods , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[11]  Sri Ram,et al.  Exploiting extension bias in polymerase chain reaction to improve primer specificity in ensembles of nearly identical DNA templates. , 2014, Environmental Microbiology.

[12]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples , 2008, Biology Letters.

[13]  M. Kondoh,et al.  MiFish, a set of universal PCR primers for metabarcoding environmental DNA from fishes: detection of more than 230 subtropical marine species , 2015, Royal Society Open Science.

[14]  P. Hebert,et al.  Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[15]  Matthew A. Barnes,et al.  The ecology of environmental DNA and implications for conservation genetics , 2016, Conservation Genetics.

[16]  Frédéric J. J. Chain,et al.  Divergence thresholds and divergent biodiversity estimates: can metabarcoding reliably describe zooplankton communities? , 2015, Ecology and evolution.

[17]  J. Amberg,et al.  Improving efficiency and reliability of environmental DNA analysis for silver carp , 2015 .

[18]  A. Sepulveda,et al.  Potential utility of environmental DNA for early detection of Eurasian watermilfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) , 2016 .

[19]  Brian J. Smith,et al.  Environmental DNA (eDNA) Sampling Improves Occurrence and Detection Estimates of Invasive Burmese Pythons , 2015, PloS one.

[20]  J. Landry,et al.  A universal DNA mini-barcode for biodiversity analysis , 2008, BMC Genomics.

[21]  M. García‐París,et al.  Phylogeography of two European newt species — discordance between mtDNA and morphology , 2005, Molecular ecology.

[22]  W. John Kress,et al.  A DNA barcode for land plants , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  C. Yesson,et al.  The evolutionary history and conservation value of disjunct Bartonia paniculata subsp. paniculata (Branched Bartonia) populations in Canada , 2013 .

[24]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  “Sight‐unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA , 2011 .

[25]  Eske Willerslev,et al.  Environmental DNA - An emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity , 2015 .

[26]  H. Doi,et al.  Using Environmental DNA to Estimate the Distribution of an Invasive Fish Species in Ponds , 2013, PloS one.

[27]  Matthew J. Colloff,et al.  Ecological assessment of estuarine sediments by pyrosequencing eukaryotic ribosomal DNA , 2010 .

[28]  Filip Pattyn,et al.  Single-nucleotide polymorphisms and other mismatches reduce performance of quantitative PCR assays. , 2013, Clinical chemistry.

[29]  C. Meyer Molecular systematics of cowries (Gastropoda: Cypraeidae) and diversification patterns in the tropics , 2003 .

[30]  J. Freeland,et al.  Development of species-specific environmental DNA (eDNA) markers for invasive aquatic plants , 2015 .

[31]  M. Chase,et al.  Barcoding of Plants and Fungi , 2009, Science.

[32]  Jesse A. Port,et al.  Assessing vertebrate biodiversity in a kelp forest ecosystem using environmental DNA , 2015, Molecular ecology.

[33]  F. Altermatt,et al.  Utility of Environmental DNA for Monitoring Rare and Indicator Macroinvertebrate Species , 2014, Freshwater Science.

[34]  Helen C. Rees,et al.  REVIEW: The detection of aquatic animal species using environmental DNA – a review of eDNA as a survey tool in ecology , 2014 .

[35]  K. Coyne,et al.  Improved Methods for Capture, Extraction, and Quantitative Assay of Environmental DNA from Asian Bigheaded Carp (Hypophthalmichthys spp.) , 2014, PloS one.

[36]  P. Hebert,et al.  The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. , 2005, Systematic biology.

[37]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Replication levels, false presences and the estimation of the presence/absence from eDNA metabarcoding data , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[38]  R. Giblin-Davis,et al.  Ultrasequencing of the meiofaunal biosphere: practice, pitfalls and promises , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[39]  A. Drummond,et al.  Evaluating a multigene environmental DNA approach for biodiversity assessment , 2015, GigaScience.

[40]  F. Altermatt,et al.  Fishing in the Water: Effect of Sampled Water Volume on Environmental DNA-Based Detection of Macroinvertebrates. , 2016, Environmental science & technology.

[41]  François Pompanon,et al.  DNA metabarcoding and the cytochrome c oxidase subunit I marker: not a perfect match , 2014, Biology Letters.

[42]  L. Orlando,et al.  Meta‐barcoding of ‘dirt’ DNA from soil reflects vertebrate biodiversity , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[43]  H. Doi,et al.  Use of Droplet Digital PCR for Estimation of Fish Abundance and Biomass in Environmental DNA Surveys , 2015, PloS one.

[44]  K. McKelvey,et al.  Robust Detection of Rare Species Using Environmental DNA: The Importance of Primer Specificity , 2013, PloS one.

[45]  Applications and limitations of measuring environmental DNA as indicators of the presence of aquatic animals , 2015 .

[46]  Pierre Taberlet,et al.  Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus , 2012 .

[47]  Shanning Zhang,et al.  Significant genetic boundaries and spatial dynamics of giant pandas occupying fragmented habitat across southwest China , 2011, Molecular ecology.

[48]  T. Glenn,et al.  Assessment of Environmental DNA for Detecting Presence of Imperiled Aquatic Amphibian Species in Isolated Wetlands , 2015 .

[49]  D. Baird,et al.  Environmental Barcoding: A Next-Generation Sequencing Approach for Biomonitoring Applications Using River Benthos , 2011, PloS one.

[50]  Jeremy R. deWaard,et al.  Biological identifications through DNA barcodes , 2003, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[51]  Carsten Wiuf,et al.  Diverse Plant and Animal Genetic Records from Holocene and Pleistocene Sediments , 2003, Science.

[52]  E. Willerslev,et al.  Characterisation of insect and plant origins using DNA extracted from small volumes of bee honey , 2010, Arthropod-Plant Interactions.

[53]  P. Sorensen,et al.  Optimizing techniques to capture and extract environmental DNA for detection and quantification of fish , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[54]  G. Wiseman State of the art and limitations of quantitative polymerase chain reaction. , 2002, Journal of AOAC International.

[55]  E. Petit,et al.  The downside of eDNA as a survey tool in water bodies , 2015 .

[56]  S. Graham,et al.  Discriminating plant species in a local temperate flora using the rbcL+matK DNA barcode , 2011 .

[57]  A. Lambert,et al.  ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[58]  P. Hebert,et al.  DNA barcoding: how it complements taxonomy, molecular phylogenetics and population genetics. , 2007, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[59]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[60]  P. Burkhardt-Holm,et al.  An eDNA Assay to Monitor a Globally Invasive Fish Species from Flowing Freshwater , 2016, PloS one.

[61]  G. Spong,et al.  Browsed twig environmental DNA: diagnostic PCR to identify ungulate species , 2012, Molecular ecology resources.

[62]  John L. Spouge,et al.  Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[63]  A blocking primer increases specificity in environmental DNA detection of bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) , 2014, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[64]  C. Jerde,et al.  The use of environmental DNA in invasive species surveillance of the Great Lakes commercial bait trade , 2015, Conservation biology : the journal of the Society for Conservation Biology.

[65]  E. Bužan,et al.  20 years since the introduction of DNA barcoding: from theory to application , 2013, Journal of Applied Genetics.

[66]  Susan M. Huse,et al.  Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere” , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[67]  T. Minamoto,et al.  The use of environmental DNA of fishes as an efficient method of determining habitat connectivity , 2016 .

[68]  D. Serre,et al.  In silico assessment of primers for eDNA studies using PrimerTree and application to characterize the biodiversity surrounding the Cuyahoga River , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[69]  James Haile,et al.  Ancient and modern environmental DNA , 2015, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[70]  Andrew P. Martin,et al.  Comparative mtDNA phylogeography of neotropical freshwater fishes: testing shared history to infer the evolutionary landscape of lower Central America , 1998, Molecular ecology.

[71]  Fabian Sievers,et al.  Clustal Omega, accurate alignment of very large numbers of sequences. , 2014, Methods in molecular biology.

[72]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Tracking earthworm communities from soil DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[73]  Adam J. Sepulveda,et al.  Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum) , 2013, Freshwater Science.

[74]  R. Giblin-Davis,et al.  Ecometagenetics confirm high tropical rainforest nematode diversity , 2010, Molecular ecology.

[75]  B. Brosi,et al.  Pollen DNA barcoding: current applications and future prospects. , 2016, Genome.

[76]  E. Willerslev,et al.  Molecular‐ and pollen‐based vegetation analysis in lake sediments from central Scandinavia , 2013, Molecular ecology.

[77]  Yiyuan Li,et al.  Quantification of mesocosm fish and amphibian species diversity via environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[78]  Kristine Bohmann,et al.  Tag jumps illuminated – reducing sequence‐to‐sample misidentifications in metabarcoding studies , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[79]  M. Pinheiro,et al.  Metabarcoding Is Powerful yet Still Blind: A Comparative Analysis of Morphological and Molecular Surveys of Seagrass Communities , 2015, PloS one.

[80]  Jian Ye,et al.  Primer-BLAST: A tool to design target-specific primers for polymerase chain reaction , 2012, BMC Bioinformatics.

[81]  L. Waits,et al.  Critical considerations for the application of environmental DNA methods to detect aquatic species , 2016 .

[82]  T. Minamoto,et al.  A basin‐scale application of environmental DNA assessment for rare endemic species and closely related exotic species in rivers: a case study of giant salamanders in Japan , 2015 .

[83]  E. Boissin,et al.  Design of phylum‐specific hybrid primers for DNA barcoding: addressing the need for efficient COI amplification in the Echinodermata , 2010, Molecular ecology resources.

[84]  Andrew R Mahon,et al.  Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms. , 2014, Environmental science & technology.

[85]  B. Deagle,et al.  Quantification of damage in DNA recovered from highly degraded samples – a case study on DNA in faeces , 2006, Frontiers in Zoology.

[86]  H. MacIsaac,et al.  Identifying the source of species invasions: sampling intensity vs. genetic diversity , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[87]  C. Goldberg,et al.  Moving environmental DNA methods from concept to practice for monitoring aquatic macroorganisms , 2015 .

[88]  Next generation sequencing for characterizing biodiversity: promises and challenges , 2015, Genetica.

[89]  Cuong Q. Tang,et al.  The widely used small subunit 18S rDNA molecule greatly underestimates true diversity in biodiversity surveys of the meiofauna , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[90]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Environmental DNA for wildlife biology and biodiversity monitoring. , 2014, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[91]  Jonathan P. Bollback,et al.  The Use of Coded PCR Primers Enables High-Throughput Sequencing of Multiple Homolog Amplification Products by 454 Parallel Sequencing , 2007, PloS one.

[92]  A. Kinziger,et al.  Using occupancy modelling to compare environmental DNA to traditional field methods for regional‐scale monitoring of an endangered aquatic species , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[93]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Active and passive environmental DNA surveillance of aquatic invasive species , 2016 .

[94]  Erik Kristiansson,et al.  The ITS region as a target for characterization of fungal communities using emerging sequencing technologies. , 2009, FEMS microbiology letters.

[95]  K. Katoh,et al.  MAFFT Multiple Sequence Alignment Software Version 7: Improvements in Performance and Usability , 2013, Molecular biology and evolution.

[96]  J. MacKay,et al.  Evaluation of the impact of single nucleotide polymorphisms and primer mismatches on quantitative PCR , 2009, BMC biotechnology.

[97]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Glacial Survival of Boreal Trees in Northern Scandinavia , 2012, Science.

[98]  K. McKelvey,et al.  DNA barcoding at riverscape scales: assessing biodiversity among fishes of the genus Cottus (Teleostei) in northern Rocky Mountain streams , 2013, Molecular ecology resources.

[99]  François Pompanon,et al.  An In silico approach for the evaluation of DNA barcodes , 2010, BMC Genomics.

[100]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Environmental DNA , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[101]  Jesse A. Port,et al.  Using Environmental DNA to Census Marine Fishes in a Large Mesocosm , 2014, PloS one.

[102]  D. Baird,et al.  Large-Scale Monitoring of Plants through Environmental DNA Metabarcoding of Soil: Recovery, Resolution, and Annotation of Four DNA Markers , 2016, PloS one.

[103]  J. Darling,et al.  Paradox lost: genetic diversity and the success of aquatic invasions. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[104]  Holly M. Bik,et al.  Sequencing our way towards understanding global eukaryotic biodiversity. , 2012, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[105]  P. Lim,et al.  DNA metabarcoding of insects and allies: an evaluation of primers and pipelines , 2015, Bulletin of Entomological Research.

[106]  M. Miya,et al.  Environmental DNA as a ‘Snapshot’ of Fish Distribution: A Case Study of Japanese Jack Mackerel in Maizuru Bay, Sea of Japan , 2016, PloS one.

[107]  C. Wiuf,et al.  Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[108]  L. Waits,et al.  Using environmental DNA methods to improve detectability in a hellbender (Cryptobranchus alleganiensis) monitoring program , 2015 .

[109]  Z. Kawabata,et al.  Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA , 2012, Limnology.

[110]  Patrick D. Schloss,et al.  Reducing the Effects of PCR Amplification and Sequencing Artifacts on 16S rRNA-Based Studies , 2011, PloS one.

[111]  R. Crozier,et al.  A fuzzy‐set‐theory‐based approach to analyse species membership in DNA barcoding , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[112]  N. Pace,et al.  Microbial ecology and evolution: a ribosomal RNA approach. , 1986, Annual review of microbiology.

[113]  L. Weyrich,et al.  Environmental metabarcodes for insects: in silico PCR reveals potential for taxonomic bias , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[114]  Environmental DNA as an effective tool for detection of imperiled fishes , 2015, Environmental Biology of Fishes.

[115]  A. Weeks,et al.  I Environmental DNA sampling is more sensitive than a traditional survey technique for detecting an aquatic invader. , 2015, Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America.

[116]  G. Ficetola,et al.  Population genetics reveals origin and number of founders in a biological invasion , 2008, Molecular ecology.

[117]  R. Massengill,et al.  An evaluation of target specificity and sensitivity of three qPCR assays for detecting environmental DNA from Northern Pike (Esox lucius) , 2015, Conservation Genetics Resources.

[118]  M. Thomas P. Gilbert,et al.  Screening mammal biodiversity using DNA from leeches , 2012, Current Biology.

[119]  G. Moyer,et al.  History, applications, methodological issues and perspectives for the use of environmental DNA (eDNA) in marine and freshwater environments. , 2014, Revista de biologia tropical.

[120]  Eoin L. Brodie,et al.  Loss of Bacterial Diversity during Antibiotic Treatment of Intubated Patients Colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa , 2006, Journal of Clinical Microbiology.

[121]  Peter Haase,et al.  First audit of macroinvertebrate samples from an EU Water Framework Directive monitoring program: human error greatly lowers precision of assessment results , 2010, Journal of the North American Benthological Society.

[122]  R. Danovaro,et al.  Unveiling the Biodiversity of Deep-Sea Nematodes through Metabarcoding: Are We Ready to Bypass the Classical Taxonomy? , 2015, PloS one.

[123]  K. McKelvey,et al.  The Dual Challenges of Generality and Specificity When Developing Environmental DNA Markers for Species and Subspecies of Oncorhynchus , 2015, PloS one.

[124]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Next‐generation sequencing technologies for environmental DNA research , 2012, Molecular ecology.

[125]  Mehrdad Hajibabaei,et al.  Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol , 2012, BMC Ecology.

[126]  L. Baillie,et al.  Using DNA Metabarcoding to Identify the Floral Composition of Honey: A New Tool for Investigating Honey Bee Foraging Preferences , 2015, PloS one.

[127]  V. Ranwez,et al.  A new versatile primer set targeting a short fragment of the mitochondrial COI region for metabarcoding metazoan diversity: application for characterizing coral reef fish gut contents , 2013, Frontiers in Zoology.

[128]  Phylogeographic inferences from chloroplast DNA: quantifying the effects of mutations in repetitive and non‐repetitive sequences , 2011, Molecular ecology resources.

[129]  E. E. Sigsgaard,et al.  Monitoring the near-extinct European weather loach in Denmark based on environmental DNA from water samples , 2015 .

[130]  W. L. Chadderton,et al.  Detection of Asian carp DNA as part of a Great Lakes basin-wide surveillance program , 2013 .

[131]  P. Taberlet,et al.  Next‐generation monitoring of aquatic biodiversity using environmental DNA metabarcoding , 2016, Molecular ecology.

[132]  M. M. Coelho,et al.  Mitochondrial DNA variation in the highly endangered cyprinid fish Anaecypris hispanica: importance for conservation , 2001, Heredity.

[133]  A. Maruyama,et al.  Techniques for the practical collection of environmental DNA: filter selection, preservation, and extraction , 2015, Limnology.

[134]  K. McKelvey,et al.  Sampling large geographic areas for rare species using environmental DNA: a study of bull trout Salvelinus confluentus occupancy in western Montana. , 2016, Journal of fish biology.

[135]  J. McLachlan,et al.  Ancient DNA from lake sediments: Bridging the gap between paleoecology and genetics , 2011, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[136]  J. Finarelli,et al.  An eDNA assay for Irish Petromyzon marinus and Salmo trutta and field validation in running water. , 2015, Journal of fish biology.

[137]  M. Schlaepfer,et al.  Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. , 2014 .

[138]  Douglas W. Yu,et al.  Reliable, verifiable and efficient monitoring of biodiversity via metabarcoding. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[139]  L. Bernatchez,et al.  Improving herpetological surveys in eastern North America using the environmental DNA method. , 2016, Genome.

[140]  L. Weyrich,et al.  Comparison of environmental DNA metabarcoding and conventional fish survey methods in a river system , 2016 .

[141]  Robert S. Arkle,et al.  Molecular Detection of Vertebrates in Stream Water: A Demonstration Using Rocky Mountain Tailed Frogs and Idaho Giant Salamanders , 2011, PloS one.

[142]  C. Goldberg,et al.  Characterizing the distribution of an endangered salmonid using environmental DNA analysis , 2015 .

[143]  Nancy Knowlton,et al.  DNA barcoding and metabarcoding of standardized samples reveal patterns of marine benthic diversity , 2015, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[144]  J. Piñol,et al.  Universal and blocking primer mismatches limit the use of high‐throughput DNA sequencing for the quantitative metabarcoding of arthropods , 2015, Molecular ecology resources.

[145]  Aurélien Ginolhac,et al.  A comparative study of ancient environmental DNA to pollen and macrofossils from lake sediments reveals taxonomic overlap and additional plant taxa , 2013 .

[146]  A. Piaggio,et al.  Detecting an elusive invasive species: a diagnostic PCR to detect Burmese python in Florida waters and an assessment of persistence of environmental DNA , 2014, Molecular ecology resources.

[147]  Akifumi S. Tanabe,et al.  Comparative study of the validity of three regions of the 18S‐rRNA gene for massively parallel sequencing‐based monitoring of the planktonic eukaryote community , 2016, Molecular ecology resources.

[148]  D. Lodge,et al.  Estimating species richness using environmental DNA , 2016, Ecology and evolution.

[149]  B. Faircloth,et al.  Primer3—new capabilities and interfaces , 2012, Nucleic acids research.

[150]  Satoshi Yamamoto,et al.  Use of environmental DNA to survey the distribution of an invasive submerged plant in ponds , 2016, Freshwater Science.

[151]  D. Lodge,et al.  Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA , 2014, bioRxiv.

[152]  J. Freeland,et al.  Molecular Ecology: Freeland/Molecular Ecology , 2011 .

[153]  J. Good,et al.  Targeted capture in evolutionary and ecological genomics , 2016, Molecular ecology.