Digital anthropometry for body circumference measurements: Toward the development of universal three‐dimensional optical system analysis software

Digital anthropometric (DA) assessments are increasingly being administered with three‐dimensional (3D) optical devices in clinical settings that manage patients with obesity and related metabolic disorders. However, anatomic measurement sites are not standardized across manufacturers, precluding use of published reference values and pooling of data across research centers.

[1]  S. Heymsfield,et al.  Novel Body Fat Estimation Using Machine Learning and 3-Dimensional Optical Imaging , 2020, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[2]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Validation and Utility Testing of Clinical Prediction Models: Time to Change the Approach. , 2020, JAMA.

[3]  B. Curless,et al.  Detailed 3-dimensional body shape features predict body composition, blood metabolites, and functional strength: the Shape Up! studies. , 2019, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[4]  John A. Shepherd,et al.  Body composition , energy expenditure and physical activity Optical imaging technology for body size and shape analysis : evaluation of a system designed for personal use , 2019 .

[5]  Alexander Dunkel,et al.  Hole Filling in 3D Scans for Digital Anthropometric Applications , 2019, 2019 41st Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).

[6]  P. Wolenski,et al.  Crotch detection on 3D optical scans of human subjects , 2019, Electronic Imaging.

[7]  Xin Li,et al.  Digital anthropometry: a critical review , 2018, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[8]  C. Fall,et al.  Comparison of regional fat measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and conventional anthropometry and their association with markers of diabetes and cardiovascular disease risk , 2017, International Journal of Obesity.

[9]  V. Somers,et al.  Reliability of a 3D Body Scanner for Anthropometric Measurements of Central Obesity. , 2016, Obesity, open access.

[10]  S B Heymsfield,et al.  Automated anthropometric phenotyping with novel Kinect-based three-dimensional imaging method: comparison with a reference laser imaging system , 2016, European Journal of Clinical Nutrition.

[11]  A M Madden,et al.  Body composition and morphological assessment of nutritional status in adults: a review of anthropometric variables. , 2016, Journal of human nutrition and dietetics : the official journal of the British Dietetic Association.

[12]  Masaaki Mochimaru,et al.  Errors in landmarking and the evaluation of the accuracy of traditional and 3D anthropometry. , 2011, Applied ergonomics.

[13]  P. Treleaven,et al.  Whole-body three-dimensional photonic scanning: a new technique for obesity research and clinical practice , 2008, International Journal of Obesity.

[14]  T J Cole,et al.  Body shape in American and British adults: between-country and inter-ethnic comparisons , 2008, International Journal of Obesity.

[15]  J. Shaw,et al.  Independent and opposite associations of waist and hip circumferences with diabetes, hypertension and dyslipidemia: the AusDiab Study , 2004, International Journal of Obesity.

[16]  S. Ho,et al.  Is waist circumference a useful measure in predicting health outcomes in the elderly? , 2002, International Journal of Obesity.

[17]  L. Pérusse,et al.  Waist and hip circumferences have independent and opposite effects on cardiovascular disease risk factors: the Quebec Family Study. , 2001, The American journal of clinical nutrition.

[18]  T. Lohman,et al.  Anthropometric Standardization Reference Manual , 1988 .