The ecology of Myrmica ants in relation to the conservation of Maculinea butterflies

Maculinea butterflies in Europe, and probably most of Asia, are host specific social parasites of various species of Myrmica ants. The latest summary of field data showing the pattern of host specificity by Maculinea is presented. Myrmica ants have been well studied in the laboratory but much less is known about the ecology of their natural populations. While the former is important in understanding the adaptive evolution of Maculinea larval behaviours, the latter is of more practical importance to conservationists charged with the protection of specific populations of Maculinea. The current knowledge of habitat partition, colony growth and colony reproduction within communities of Myrmica ants is summarized in relation to the ecology of Maculinea species. Concepts used in current population simulation models are explained. A key concept is the idea that community structure (both number of species and size and abundance of nests) is controlled by the quantity and quality of suitable nest sites. Some advice is given to conservationists who might need to manipulate Myrmica ant populations in order to maintain a robust population of a Maculinea species. © Rapid Science Ltd. 1998

[1]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  The effect of queen ants on the survival of Maculinea arion larvae in Myrmica ant nests , 1990, Oecologia.

[2]  J. Wardlaw,et al.  A comparison of the effect of temperature on the development of large hibernated larvae of four species ofMyrmica (Hym. Formicidae) , 1983, Insectes Sociaux.

[3]  J. Evans.  Temporal and spatial variation in reproduction in the facultatively polygynous antMyrmica tahoensis (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1996, Insectes Sociaux.

[4]  M. Munguira,et al.  Differences in host-ant specificity between Spanish, Dutch and Swedish populations of the endangered butterfly, Maculinea alcon [DENIS et SCHIFF.] [Lepidoptera] , 1994 .

[5]  J. Verhaeghe,et al.  Ontogenesis of trail pheromone production and trail following behaviour in the workers ofMyrmica rubra L. (Formicidae) , 1974, Insectes Sociaux.

[6]  K. Fiedler.  REVIEW: Lycaenid-ant interactions of the Maculinea type: tracing their historical roots in a comparative framework , 1998, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[7]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Population modelling of the spatial interactions between Maculinea rebeli their initial foodplant Gentiana cruciata and Myrmica ants within a site , 1998, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[8]  M. Brian.  Social Insect Populations , 1967 .

[9]  G. Elmes.  Queen numbers in colonies of ants of the genusMyrmica , 1980, Insectes Sociaux.

[10]  M. Hochberg,et al.  The effects of spatial patterns in habitat quality on community dynamics within a site , 1997, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[11]  K. Vepsäläinen,et al.  A competition hierarchy among boreal ants: impact on resource partitioning and community structure , 1988 .

[12]  J. Thomas,et al.  The ecology and conservation of Maculinea arion and other European species of large blue butterfly , 1995 .

[13]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Effects of latitude, altitude and climate on the habitat and conservation of the endangered butterfly Maculinea arion and its Myrmica ant hosts , 1998, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[14]  M. Hochberg,et al.  A modelling study of the population dynamics of a large blue butterfly, Maculinea rebeli, a parasite of red ant nests , 1992 .

[15]  Jeremy A. Thomas,et al.  Larvae of Maculinea rebeli, a large‐blue butterfly, and their Myrmica host ants: wild adoption and behaviour in ant‐nests , 1991 .

[16]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Population dynamic consequences of direct and indirect interactions involving a large blue butterfly and its plant and red ant hosts , 1994 .

[17]  M. Tricot.  Recruitment to food in Myrmica rubra , 1978 .

[18]  M. Brian.  THE STRUCTURE OF A DENSE NATURAL ANT POPULATION , 1952 .

[19]  M. Brian,et al.  Studies of caste differentiation inMyrmica rubra L. , 1967, Insectes Sociaux.

[20]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Mechanisms of Local Persistence in Coupled Host-Parasitoid Associations: The Case Model of Maculinea rebeli and Ichneumon eumerus , 1996 .

[21]  A. Mabelis.  Interference Between Wood Ants and Other Ant Species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) , 1983 .

[22]  M. Woyciechowski,et al.  Host specificity among Maculinea butterflies in Myrmica ant nests , 1989, Oecologia.

[23]  G. Elmes.  The phenology of five species ofMyrmica (Hym. Formicidae) from South Dorset, England , 1982, Insectes Sociaux.

[24]  P. Seppä.  Genetic relatedness and colony structure in polygynous Myrmica ants , 1996 .

[25]  P. DeVries.  Call production by myrmecophilous riodinid and lycaenid butterfly caterpillars (Lepidoptera) : morphological, acoustical, functional, and evolutionary patterns. American Museum novitates ; no. 3025 , 1991 .

[26]  M. Brian,et al.  Larval size and the influence of the queen on growth inMyrmica , 1963, Insectes Sociaux.

[27]  J. Thomas,et al.  Higher productivity at the cost of increased host‐specificity when Maculinea butterfly larvae exploit ant colonies through trophallaxis rather than by predation , 1998 .

[28]  J. Boomsma,et al.  Genetic population structure of the large blue butterfly Maculinea alcon in Denmark , 1997, Journal of Insect Conservation.

[29]  H. Malicky.  Versuch einer Analyse der ökologischen Beziehungen zwischen Lycaeniden (Lepidoptera) und Formiciden (Hymenoptera) , 1969 .

[30]  M. Hochberg,et al.  Empirical tests of specific predictions made from a spatial model of the population dynamics of Maculinea rebeli, a parasitic butterfly of red ant colonies , 1996 .

[31]  C. Gaillard.  The environmental impact of burrowing animals and animal burrows , 1993 .

[32]  J. Thomas,et al.  Complexity of species conservation in managed habitats: interaction betweenMaculinea butterflies and their ant hosts , 1992, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[33]  P. Seppä.  Sociogenetic organization of the ants Myrmica ruginodis and Myrmica lobicornis: Number, relatedness and longevity of reproducing individuals , 1994 .

[34]  K. Vepsäläinen,et al.  The effect of interference by formicine ants on the foraging of Myrmica. , 1990 .

[35]  L. Keller.  Queen number and sociality in insects , 1993 .

[36]  G. Elmes.  Temporal Variation in Colony Populations of the Ant Myrmica sulcinodis: I. Changes in Queen Number, Worker Number and Spring Production , 1987 .

[37]  M. Brian.  Studies of caste differentiation in «Myrmica Rubra» L , 1955, Insectes Sociaux.

[38]  J. Thomas,et al.  The capacity of a Myrmica ant nest to support a predacious species of Maculinea butterfly , 1992, Oecologia.

[39]  J. Thomas,et al.  Why Did the Large Blue Become Extinct in Britain? , 1980, Oryx.

[40]  D. J. Stradling,et al.  Ant Pattern and Density in a Southern English Heath , 1965 .

[41]  G. Elmes,et al.  Queen number as an adaptable trait: evidence from wild populations of two red ant species (genus Myrmica). , 1990 .

[42]  G. Elmes.  Populations of Myrmica (Formicidae) living on different types of Calluna moorland - a semi-natural habitat of Southern England , 1978 .

[43]  B. Pearson.  Intra-colonial relatedness amongst workers in a population of nests of the polygynous ant, Myrmica rubra latreille , 1983, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[44]  M. Brian,et al.  Studies of caste differentiation inMyrmica rubra L , 1964, Insectes Sociaux.

[45]  K. Vepsäläinen,et al.  Niche differentiation of ant species within territories of the wood ant Formica polyctena , 1989 .

[46]  G. Elmes.  Observations on the Density of Queens in Natural Colonies of Myrmica rubra L. (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) , 1973 .

[47]  J. Evans.  Queen longevity, queen adoption, and posthumous indirect fitness in the facultatively polygynous ant Myrmica tahoensis , 1996, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[48]  L. Keller,et al.  Distribution and ecology of queen number in ants of the genus Myrmica , 1993 .