Biological Scaffolds for Abdominal Wall Repair: Future in Clinical Application?

Millions of abdominal wall repair procedures are performed each year for primary and incisional hernias both in the European Union and in the United States with extremely high costs. Synthetic meshes approved for augmenting abdominal wall repair provide adequate mechanical support but have significant drawbacks (seroma formation, adhesion to viscera, stiffness of abdominal wall, and infection). Biologic scaffolds (i.e., derived from naturally occurring materials) represent an alternative to synthetic surgical meshes and are less sensitive to infection. Among biologic scaffolds, extracellular matrix scaffolds promote stem/progenitor cell recruitment in models of tissue remodeling and, in the specific application of abdominal wall repair, have enough mechanical strength to support the repair. However, many concerns remain about the use of these scaffolds in the clinic due to their higher cost of production compared with synthetic meshes, despite having the same recurrence rate. The present review aims to highlight the pros and cons of using biologic scaffolds as surgical devices for abdominal wall repair and present possible improvements to widen their use in clinical practice.

[1]  Michel Modo,et al.  Biodegradation of ECM hydrogel promotes endogenous brain tissue restoration in a rat model of stroke. , 2018, Acta biomaterialia.

[2]  S. Badylak,et al.  Host protection against deliberate bacterial contamination of an extracellular matrix bioscaffold versus Dacron mesh in a dog model of orthopedic soft tissue repair. , 2003, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[3]  Kerry A. Daly,et al.  Macrophage polarization in response to ECM coated polypropylene mesh. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[4]  K. Shakesheff,et al.  Scaffolds containing growth factors and extracellular matrix induce hepatocyte proliferation and cell migration in normal and regenerating rat liver. , 2011, Journal of hepatology.

[5]  Bernard T. Lee,et al.  Properties of Meshes used in Hernia Repair: A Comprehensive Review of Synthetic and Biologic Meshes , 2014, Journal of Reconstructive Microsurgery.

[6]  S. Hazinedaroglu,et al.  Comparison of Adhesive Properties of Five Different Prosthetic Materials Used in Hernioplasty , 2005, Journal of investigative surgery : the official journal of the Academy of Surgical Research.

[7]  B. Matthews,et al.  Early biocompatibility of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic meshes in a porcine model of ventral hernia repair , 2011, Hernia.

[8]  M. Fisher,et al.  Macrophages' Role in Tissue Disease and Regeneration. , 2017, Results and problems in cell differentiation.

[9]  A. Charles,et al.  Trends in emergent hernia repair in the United States. , 2015, JAMA surgery.

[10]  P. Alam Results and Problems in Cell Differentiation , 2018 .

[11]  V. Agrawal,et al.  Recruitment of progenitor cells by an extracellular matrix cryptic peptide in a mouse model of digit amputation. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[12]  A. Park,et al.  Minimal Adhesions to ePTFE Mesh After Laparoscopic Ventral Incisional Hernia Repair: Reoperative Findings in 65 Cases , 2003, Zentralblatt fur Chirurgie.

[13]  Yves Bayon,et al.  Comparing the host tissue response and peritoneal behavior of composite meshes used for ventral hernia repair. , 2015, The Journal of surgical research.

[14]  A. Pandit,et al.  Cross-Linked Cholecyst-Derived Extracellular Matrix for Abdominal Wall Repair. , 2018, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[15]  Spencer P Lake,et al.  Mechanical properties of the abdominal wall and biomaterials utilized for hernia repair. , 2017, Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials.

[16]  É. Mezey,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells and infectious diseases: Smarter than drugs. , 2015, Immunology letters.

[17]  A. Natali,et al.  Synthetic surgical meshes used in abdominal wall surgery: Part I-materials and structural conformation. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[18]  C. Aubé,et al.  Ultrasound detection of visceral adhesion after intraperitoneal ventral hernia treatment: A comparative study of protected versus unprotected meshes , 2003, Hernia.

[19]  Y. Novitsky,et al.  Classification of Hernias , 2016 .

[20]  M. Rosen,et al.  Bacterial clearance of biologic grafts used in hernia repair: an experimental study , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[21]  M. Franz,et al.  Evolution and advances in laparoscopic ventral and incisional hernia repair. , 2015, World journal of gastrointestinal surgery.

[22]  C. Medberry,et al.  Resistance to infection of five different materials in a rat body wall model. , 2012, The Journal of surgical research.

[23]  B. Chazaud,et al.  Metabolic regulation of macrophages during tissue repair: insights from skeletal muscle regeneration , 2017, FEBS letters.

[24]  F. Gossetti,et al.  Mesh migration into the large bowel following inguinal hernia repair. A new task for the colorectal surgeon? , 2018, Colorectal disease : the official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

[25]  S. Ferzoco,et al.  Early experience outcome of a reinforced Bioscaffold in inguinal hernia repair: A case series , 2018 .

[26]  Michael G. Tecce,et al.  Incisional Hernia in the United States: Trends in Hospital Encounters and Corresponding Healthcare Charges , 2018, The American surgeon.

[27]  P. Gentile,et al.  Engineered Fat Graft Enhanced with Adipose-Derived Stromal Vascular Fraction Cells for Regenerative Medicine: Clinical, Histological and Instrumental Evaluation in Breast Reconstruction , 2019, Journal of clinical medicine.

[28]  G. Pascual,et al.  Biomaterial Implants in Abdominal Wall Hernia Repair: A Review on the Importance of the Peritoneal Interface , 2019, Processes.

[29]  S. Badylak,et al.  Biologic Scaffolds. , 2017, Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine.

[30]  F. Gossetti,et al.  Mesh-related visceral complications following inguinal hernia repair: an emerging topic , 2019, Hernia.

[31]  Sameer H. Halani,et al.  A Comparison of Acellular Dermal Matrices in Abdominal Wall Reconstruction , 2019, Annals of plastic surgery.

[32]  Jenna L. Dziki,et al.  Restoring Mucosal Barrier Function and Modifying Macrophage Phenotype with an Extracellular Matrix Hydrogel: Potential Therapy for Ulcerative Colitis , 2016, Journal of Crohn's & colitis.

[33]  Gordon K. Lee,et al.  Health-Related Quality of Life After Ventral Hernia Repair With Biologic and Synthetic Mesh , 2019, Annals of plastic surgery.

[34]  E. Pauli,et al.  Comparative analysis of biologic versus synthetic mesh outcomes in contaminated hernia repairs. , 2016, Surgery.

[35]  S. Phillips,et al.  Epidemiology and cost of ventral hernia repair: making the case for hernia research , 2012, Hernia.

[36]  Hydrogel-based scaffolds to support intrathecal stem cell transplantation as a gateway to the spinal cord: clinical needs, biomaterials, and imaging technologies , 2018, npj Regenerative Medicine.

[37]  Douglas J. Weber,et al.  An Acellular Biologic Scaffold Promotes Skeletal Muscle Formation in Mice and Humans with Volumetric Muscle Loss , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[38]  B. Brown,et al.  Macrophage polarization: an opportunity for improved outcomes in biomaterials and regenerative medicine. , 2012, Biomaterials.

[39]  M. Fabbi,et al.  Adhesion prevention in ventral hernia repair: an experimental study comparing three lightweight porous meshes recommended for intraperitoneal use , 2017, Hernia.

[40]  C. Seiler,et al.  Laparoscopic versus open surgical techniques for ventral or incisional hernia repair. , 2011, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[41]  H. Wendel,et al.  Biodegradable rifampicin-releasing coating of surgical meshes for the prevention of bacterial infections , 2017, Drug design, development and therapy.

[42]  Ferdous Khan,et al.  Designing Smart Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering , 2017, International journal of molecular sciences.

[43]  G. Pascual,et al.  Tissue integration and inflammatory reaction in full-thickness abdominal wall repair using an innovative composite mesh , 2016, Hernia.

[44]  G. P. Yang From intraperitoneal onlay mesh repair to preperitoneal onlay mesh repair , 2017, Asian journal of endoscopic surgery.

[45]  G. Giatsidis,et al.  Fascia Lata Allografts as Biological Mesh in Abdominal Wall Repair: Preliminary Outcomes from a Retrospective Case Series , 2013, Plastic and reconstructive surgery.

[46]  J. Allé,et al.  Eighty-five redo surgeries after 733 laparoscopic treatments for ventral and incisional hernia: adhesion and recurrence analysis , 2010, Hernia.

[47]  Kerry A. Daly,et al.  An isolated cryptic peptide influences osteogenesis and bone remodeling in an adult mammalian model of digit amputation. , 2011, Tissue engineering. Part A.

[48]  L. Pierce,et al.  An experimental comparison of the effects of bacterial colonization on biologic and synthetic meshes , 2015, Hernia.

[49]  Q. Nunes,et al.  Parietex™ Composite mesh versus DynaMesh®-IPOM for laparoscopic incisional and ventral hernia repair: a retrospective cohort study. , 2016, Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England.

[50]  A N Natali,et al.  Synthetic surgical meshes used in abdominal wall surgery: Part II-Biomechanical aspects. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[51]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  An overview of tissue and whole organ decellularization processes. , 2011, Biomaterials.

[52]  J. Greve,et al.  Coated meshes for hernia repair provide comparable intraperitoneal adhesion prevention , 2013, Surgical Endoscopy.

[53]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  Crosslinking strategies for preparation of extracellular matrix-derived cardiovascular scaffolds , 2014, Regenerative biomaterials.

[54]  G. D’Egidio,et al.  Approach to economic analysis in critical care. , 2016, Journal of critical care.

[55]  M. Rosen,et al.  Design and initial implementation of HerQLes: a hernia-related quality-of-life survey to assess abdominal wall function. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[56]  P. Lingohr,et al.  Comparison of biological and alloplastic meshes in ventral incisional hernia repair , 2017, Langenbeck's Archives of Surgery.

[57]  B. Heniford,et al.  Biologic mesh in ventral hernia repair: Outcomes, recurrence, and charge analysis. , 2016, Surgery.

[58]  S. Badylak,et al.  Implantation of Brain-Derived Extracellular Matrix Enhances Neurological Recovery after Traumatic Brain Injury , 2017, Cell transplantation.

[59]  T. Bisgaard,et al.  Long-term Recurrence and Complications Associated With Elective Incisional Hernia Repair. , 2016, JAMA.

[60]  S. Phillips,et al.  Cost-Utility Analysis of Biologic and Biosynthetic Mesh in Ventral Hernia Repair: When Are They Worth It? , 2019, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[61]  Viola Vogel,et al.  Crosslinking of cell-derived 3D scaffolds up-regulates the stretching and unfolding of new extracellular matrix assembled by reseeded cells. , 2009, Integrative biology : quantitative biosciences from nano to macro.

[62]  Jenna L. Dziki,et al.  Solubilized extracellular matrix bioscaffolds derived from diverse source tissues differentially influence macrophage phenotype. , 2017, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part A.

[63]  Stephen F Badylak,et al.  Antibacterial activity within degradation products of biological scaffolds composed of extracellular matrix. , 2006, Tissue engineering.

[64]  J. Jeekel,et al.  A comparison of suture repair with mesh repair for incisional hernia. , 2000, The New England journal of medicine.

[65]  P. Sibbons,et al.  Evaluation of crosslinked and non-crosslinked biologic prostheses for abdominal hernia repair , 2011, Hernia.

[66]  Edwin Wu,et al.  Inflammation as a Driver of Adverse Left Ventricular Remodeling After Acute Myocardial Infarction. , 2016, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[67]  N. Turner,et al.  Mechanical strength vs. degradation of a biologically-derived surgical mesh over time in a rodent full thickness abdominal wall defect. , 2016, Biomaterials.

[68]  Julie A. Phillippi,et al.  Perivascular extracellular matrix hydrogels mimic native matrix microarchitecture and promote angiogenesis via basic fibroblast growth factor. , 2017, Biomaterials.

[69]  B. Matthews,et al.  Ventralight ST and SorbaFix Versus Physiomesh and Securestrap in a Porcine Model , 2013, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.