Comparisons of Surface Plasmon Sensitivities in Periodic Gold Nanostructures

The wavelength sensitivities of three kinds of nanostructures (nanoslits, nanoholes, and concentric circles) with various aperture sizes were compared in water environment. These nanostructures were made on a 110-nm-thick gold film with a period of 600 nm. Surface plasmon resonances in these nanostructures produce transmission dips near the phase-matching conditions while peaks at longer wavelengths. The wavelength sensitivities measured at dips are close to theoretical predictions and about 1.5 times larger than those measured at peaks. Such sensitivity difference is attributed to various surface plasmon distributions, as illustrated by the finite-difference time-domain calculations. In addition, the sensitivity decreases with the increase of aperture size. The nanoslit array and concentric circles have better sensitivities than the nanohole array due to the no cut-off transmission.

[1]  Yeshaiahu Fainman,et al.  Spectral sensitivity of two-dimensional nanohole array surface plasmon polariton resonance sensor , 2007 .

[2]  K. Kavanagh,et al.  Surface plasmon sensor based on the enhanced light transmission through arrays of nanoholes in gold films. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[3]  R A Linke,et al.  Beaming Light from a Subwavelength Aperture , 2002, Science.

[4]  Lei Wang,et al.  High-sensitivity surface plasmon resonance spectroscopy based on a metal nanoslit array , 2006 .

[5]  H. Lezec,et al.  Extraordinary optical transmission through sub-wavelength hole arrays , 1998, Nature.

[6]  J. Bigot,et al.  Analytical model of the optical response of periodically structured metallic films: Reply. , 2005, Optics express.

[7]  D. Heitmann,et al.  SURFACE-PLASMON-ENHANCED TRANSMISSION THROUGH METALLIC GRATINGS , 1998 .

[8]  K. Malloy,et al.  Enhanced infrared transmission through subwavelength coaxial metallic arrays. , 2005, Physical review letters.

[9]  Günter Gauglitz,et al.  Surface plasmon resonance sensors: review , 1999 .

[10]  Stephen Gray,et al.  Surface plasmon generation and light transmission by isolated nanoholes and arrays of nanoholes in thin metal films. , 2005, Optics express.

[11]  Franciscus B. Segerink,et al.  Influence of hole size on the extraordinary transmission through subwavelength hole arrays , 2004 .

[12]  Way-Seen Wang,et al.  Sensitive biosensor array using surface plasmon resonance on metallic nanoslits. , 2007, Journal of biomedical optics.

[13]  P. Lalanne,et al.  Negative role of surface plasmons in the transmission of metallic gratings with very narrow slits. , 2002, Physical review letters.

[14]  J. P. Woerdman,et al.  Fano-type interpretation of red shifts and red tails in hole array transmission spectra , 2003, physics/0401054.

[15]  Rich,et al.  Implementing surface plasmon resonance biosensors in drug discovery. , 2000, Pharmaceutical science & technology today.

[16]  P. Stark,et al.  Short order nanohole arrays in metals for highly sensitive probing of local indices of refraction as the basis for a highly multiplexed biosensor technology. , 2005, Methods.

[17]  W. Fann,et al.  Optical near field in nanometallic slits. , 2002, Optics express.

[18]  W. Knoll,et al.  Interfaces and thin films as seen by bound electromagnetic waves. , 1998, Annual review of physical chemistry.

[19]  Antoine Moreau,et al.  Enhanced transmission of slit arrays in an extremely thin metallic film , 2006, physics/0606052.

[20]  N. V. van Hulst,et al.  Strong influence of hole shape on extraordinary transmission through periodic arrays of subwavelength holes. , 2004, Physical review letters.

[21]  Thomas W. Ebbesen,et al.  The role of localized surface plasmon modes in the enhanced transmission of periodic subwavelength apertures , 2005 .