Slicing the cake without baking it: Opportunistic platform entry strategies in digital markets

abstract The growth of digital platforms relies on the generative nature of digital resources and platforms' openness to complementary innovation. These features often generate strong network effects and winner-take-all dynamics that protect incumbents from competition. However, under certain conditions, these same features render incumbent platforms vulnerable to competitive strategic moves via entrant platforms wherein the entrants can capture value and simultaneously avoid upfront investments in value creation. In this study, we identify three such strategies: platform exploitation, platform injection, and platform pacing. These strategies allow the entrant platform to capture value using the incumbent ecosystem's resources by copying parts of the resources (exploitation), by following the development cycle of key boundary resources (pacing), or by placing itself inside the platform (injection). In this study, we employ an interpretative cross-case synthesis to both theorize these strategies as a new category of opportunistic platform competition and to reveal their distinctive characteristics. Overall, the study demonstrates the potential for unconventional and opportunistic platform competition strategies that extend beyond more traditional ones, such as quality, variety, and network size.

[1]  A. Salter,et al.  The paradox of openness: Appropriability, external search and collaboration , 2014 .

[2]  Willow A. Sheremata Competing Through Innovation in Network Markets: Strategies for Challengers , 2004 .

[3]  David J. Miller,et al.  Reconceptualizing competitive dynamics: : A multidimensional framework , 2015 .

[4]  A. Gawer,et al.  How Companies Become Platform Leaders , 2008 .

[5]  D. Teece Profiting from technological innovation: Implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy , 1993 .

[6]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Opening Platforms: How, When and Why? , 2008 .

[7]  Mara Lederman,et al.  Software Exclusivity and the Scope of Indirect Network Effects in the U.S. Home Video Game Market , 2007 .

[8]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  The Dynamics of Open Strategy: From Adoption to Reversion , 2017 .

[9]  S. Stremersch,et al.  Multihoming in Two-Sided Markets: An Empirical Inquiry in the Video Game Console Industry , 2011 .

[10]  B. Caillaud,et al.  Chicken & Egg: Competition Among Intermediation Service Providers , 2003 .

[11]  Kevin J. Boudreau,et al.  Open Platform Strategies and Innovation: Granting Access vs. Devolving Control , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[12]  G. Tellis,et al.  Does Quality Win? Network Effects versus Quality in High-Tech Markets , 2009 .

[13]  Joel West,et al.  How open is open enough?: Melding proprietary and open source platform strategies , 2003 .

[14]  Julian Wright,et al.  Multi-Sided Platforms , 2015 .

[15]  Max Chen Competitor analysis and interfirm riva-lry: toward a theoretical integration , 1996 .

[16]  M. Armstrong Competition in Two-Sided Markets ¤ , 2005 .

[17]  David Gann,et al.  Architectural Leverage: Putting Platforms in Context , 2014 .

[18]  Scott Gallagher,et al.  Innovation and competition in standard-based industries: a historical analysis of the US home video game market , 2002, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[19]  David P. McIntyre,et al.  Strategy in Network Industries: A Review and Research Agenda , 2009 .

[20]  D. Teece Profiting from innovation in the digital economy: Enabling technologies, standards, and licensing models in the wireless world , 2018, Research Policy.

[21]  Curba Morris Lampert,et al.  The Second Face of Appropriability: Generative Appropriability and Its Determinants , 2013 .

[22]  Dovev Lavie The Competitive Advantage of Interconnected Firms: An Extension of the Resource-Based View , 2006 .

[23]  Patricia Klarner,et al.  How do chief digital officers pursue digital transformation activities? The role of organization design parameters , 2020, Long Range Planning.

[24]  P. Ritala,et al.  Coopetition-based business models: The case of Amazon.com , 2014 .

[25]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Innovation, Openness, and Platform Control , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[26]  Mark de Reuver,et al.  The digital platform: a research agenda , 2018, J. Inf. Technol..

[27]  K. Arrow Information and Economic Behavior , 1973 .

[28]  H. Suri Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis , 2011 .

[29]  Geoffrey G. Parker,et al.  Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design , 2010, Manag. Sci..

[30]  Tobias Kretschmer,et al.  Platform Architecture, Multihoming and Complement Quality: Evidence from the U.S. Video Game Industry , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[31]  W. Hulsink,et al.  A Qualitative Approach to Evidence–Based Entrepreneurship: Theoretical Considerations and an Example Involving Business Clusters , 2014 .

[32]  J. F. Moore,et al.  Predators and prey: a new ecology of competition. , 1993, Harvard business review.

[33]  Kim B. Clark,et al.  Design Rules: The Power of Modularity , 2000 .

[34]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  The Relational View: Cooperative Strategy and Sources of Interorganizational Competitive Advantage , 1998 .

[35]  Paavo Ritala,et al.  Platform design framework: conceptualisation and application , 2018, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[36]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Research Commentary - The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation: An Agenda for Information Systems Research , 2010, Inf. Syst. Res..

[37]  Youngjin Yoo,et al.  Distributed Tuning of Boundary Resources: The Case of Apple's iOS Service System , 2015, MIS Q..

[38]  LyytinenKalle,et al.  Research Commentary---The New Organizing Logic of Digital Innovation , 2010 .

[39]  Jonathan M. Barnett,et al.  The Host's Dilemma: Strategic Forfeiture in Platform Markets for Informational Goods , 2011 .

[40]  R. Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Business Model Innovation and Competitive Imitation: The Case of Sponsor-Based Business Models , 2013 .

[41]  Karl S.R. Warner,et al.  Building dynamic capabilities for digital transformation: An ongoing process of strategic renewal , 2019, Long Range Planning.

[42]  Ola Henfridsson,et al.  Balancing platform control and external contribution in third‐party development: the boundary resources model , 2013, Inf. Syst. J..

[43]  Joseph Farrell,et al.  Converters, Compatibility, and the Control of Interfaces , 2015 .

[44]  D. McIntyre,et al.  Networks, platforms, and strategy: Emerging views and next steps , 2017 .

[45]  M. Iansiti,et al.  Entry into Platform-Based Markets , 2012 .

[46]  Peter S. Menell API Copyrightability Bleak House: Unraveling and Repairing the Oracle v. Google Jurisdictional Mess , 2017 .

[47]  Xiaoyue Jiang,et al.  Platform Ecosystems: How Developers Invert the Firm , 2016, MIS Q..

[48]  A. Gawer,et al.  Towards a Theory of Ecosystems , 2018, Strategic Management Journal.

[49]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[50]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Exploiting and Defending Open Digital Platforms with Boundary Resources: Android's Five Platform Forks , 2018, Inf. Syst. Res..

[51]  Juan Santaló,et al.  Generativity Tension and Value Creation in Platform Ecosystems , 2019, Organization Science.

[52]  Melissa A. Schilling Technology Success and Failure in Winner-Take-All Markets: The Impact of Learning Orientation, Timing, and Network Externalities , 2002 .

[53]  J. Rochet,et al.  Two-sided markets: a progress report , 2006 .

[54]  R. Grant Toward a Knowledge-Based Theory of the Firm,” Strategic Management Journal (17), pp. , 1996 .

[55]  J. Rochet,et al.  Platform competition in two sided markets , 2003 .

[56]  Christina Hoon,et al.  Meta-Synthesis of Qualitative Case Studies , 2012 .

[57]  G. Hamel Competition for competence and interpartner learning within international strategic alliances , 1991 .

[58]  Venkatesh Shankar,et al.  Network Effects and Competition: An Empirical Analysis of the Home Video Game Industry , 2002 .

[59]  Carmelo Cennamo Competing in Digital Markets: A Platform-Based Perspective , 2019, Academy of Management Perspectives.

[60]  Ashley A. Bush,et al.  Platform Evolution: Coevolution of Platform Architecture, Governance, and Environmental Dynamics , 2010 .

[61]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[62]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Organizing for Innovation in the Digitized World , 2012, Organ. Sci..

[63]  Raphael Amit,et al.  Value Creation through Novel Resource Configurations in a Digitally Enabled World , 2017 .

[64]  Alessandro Bianchi,et al.  An exploratory case study of the maintenance effectiveness of traceability models , 2000, Proceedings IWPC 2000. 8th International Workshop on Program Comprehension.

[65]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Android and the demise of operating system-based power , 2014 .

[66]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Platform competition: Strategic trade‐offs in platform markets , 2013 .

[67]  Ramon Casadesus-Masanell,et al.  Strategies to Fight Ad-Sponsored Rivals , 2010 .

[68]  Carmelo Cennamo,et al.  Disruption in Platform‐Based Ecosystems , 2018, Journal of Management Studies.

[69]  Jannis Kallinikos,et al.  The Ambivalent Ontology of Digital Artifacts , 2013, MIS Q..

[70]  J. Barney Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .