Peer feedback on writing: Is on-line actually better than on-paper?

This paper evaluates peer feedback given in parallel writing classes using an on-line Blackboard® closed blog, and a face-to-face on-paper environment. The feedback responses were coded using a modified Faigley & Witte taxonomy (1981), incorporating the hedging/mitigation elements from Ferris, Pezone, Tate and Tinti (1997). Quantity and type of responses differed significantly in many ways, with more surface proof-reading type feedback in the paper environment, a slightly higher level of macro-structure comment in the blog environment, a much higher level of affirmation and mitigation of revision comments on the blog, plus significant style and register differences. Attention must also be paid to interpersonal issues raised perhaps due to the overlap of classroom technologies with social communication media.

[1]  John R. Hayes,et al.  What Triggers Revision , 2004 .

[2]  Richard E. Ferdig,et al.  Content Delivery in the "Blogosphere" , 2004 .

[3]  Catherine Adams,et al.  The Phenomenology of Space in Writing Online , 2009 .

[4]  Doris Dippold.  Peer feedback through blogs: Student and teacher perceptions in an advanced german class , 2009, ReCALL.

[5]  D. Ferris.  THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .

[6]  Karen E. Johnson,et al.  Peer Review Negotiations: Revision Activities in ESL Writing Instruction , 1994 .

[7]  Paul Rollinson,et al.  Using peer feedback in the ESL writing class , 2005 .

[8]  L. V. Waes,et al.  Writing profiles : the effect of the writing mode on pausing and revision patterns of experienced writers , 2003 .

[9]  Lucile Chanquoy,et al.  Revision : cognitive and instructional processes , 2004 .

[10]  Amber M. Buck,et al.  The Invisible Interface: MS Word in the Writing Center , 2008 .

[11]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Feedback on second language students' writing , 2006, Language Teaching.

[12]  Mariangela Treglia.  Teacher-Written Commentary in College Writing Composition: How Does It Impact Student Revisions?. , 2009 .

[13]  D. Ferris,et al.  Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications , 1997 .

[14]  Cynthia L. Selfe.  Technology and Literacy: A Story about the Perils of Not Paying Attention , 1999, College Composition & Communication.

[15]  Patricia Webb Boyd,et al.  Analyzing Students’ Perceptions of Their Learning in Online and Hybrid First-Year Composition Courses , 2008 .

[16]  J. Hayes,et al.  A Cognitive Process Theory of Writing , 1981, College Composition & Communication.

[17]  John Bitchener,et al.  Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. , 2008 .

[18]  Christina Haas,et al.  Does the Medium Make a Difference? Two Studies of Writing With Pen and Paper and With Computers , 1989, Hum. Comput. Interact..

[19]  Jean Chandler.  A response to Truscott , 2004 .

[20]  Linda Flower,et al.  Problem-Solving Strategies and the Writing Process , 1977, College English.

[21]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Contexts and issues in feedback on L2 writing: An introduction , 2006 .

[22]  L. Flower.  Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision , 1986, College Composition & Communication.

[23]  Debra Myhill,et al.  More Than Just Error Correction , 2007 .

[24]  Joyce Seitzinger.  Be Constructive: Blogs, Podcasts, and Wikis as Constructivist Learning Tools , 2006 .

[25]  Randall W. Sadler,et al.  The effect and affect of peer review in electronic versus traditional modes on L2 writing , 2003 .

[26]  Ursula Wingate,et al.  Developing students' academic literacy: an online approach , 2009 .

[27]  E. Berg,et al.  The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality , 1999 .

[28]  Beth L. Hewett,et al.  Characteristics of interactive oral and computer-mediated peer group talk and its influence on revision , 2000 .

[29]  Trena M. Paulus,et al.  The Effect of Peer and Teacher Feedback on Student Writing , 1999 .

[30]  Charles A. MacArthur,et al.  Handbook of Writing Research , 2005 .

[31]  Frank Tuzi,et al.  The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course , 2004 .

[32]  J. Offer.  Mind and Society , 1988, Vygotsky and the Social Formation of Mind.

[33]  F. Simmons,et al.  Undergraduate students' ability to revise text effectively: relationships with topic knowledge and working memory , 2010 .

[34]  M. Bunge.  Mind and Society , 2010 .

[35]  Ulla Connor,et al.  Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision? , 1994 .

[36]  John Bitchener,et al.  The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. , 2005 .

[37]  Douglas J. Hacker,et al.  Environmental, cognitive, and metacognitive influences on text revision: Assessing the evidence , 1996 .

[38]  Willard Richardson,et al.  Blogs, Wikis, Podcasts, and Other Powerful Web Tools for Classrooms , 2006 .

[39]  John Truscott,et al.  Review Article The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes , 1996 .