Investment Frameworks : De-biased Decision Making in Equity Investing

Because people are irrational in systematic and predictable ways, decision-making processes can be an important driver of investing success if they mitigate biases and enhance objectivity. However, there is little consensus on the best approach to making investment decisions. Many investors rely on informal intuitive decision making guided by unreliable mental narratives, which are automatically generated stories that seemingly explain the immediately available data points. Our perception of evidence is naturally distorted to be artificially coherent with these narratives, so this approach often leads to biased, overconfident choices. At the other end of the spectrum, “black box” quantitative, factor-based investing, driven by statistical inputs and purely algorithmic processes, typically forgoes the benefit of differentiated forward-looking views based on fundamental research and expertise.

[1]  Daniela Fischer Winning Decisions Getting It Right The First Time , 2016 .

[2]  J. E. Russo,et al.  Commitment to a developing preference and predecisional distortion of information , 2012 .

[3]  Olga Kostopoulou,et al.  Information Distortion in Physicians’ Diagnostic Judgments , 2012, Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making.

[4]  D. Tuckett Minding the Markets: An Emotional Finance View of Financial Instability , 2011 .

[5]  J. E. Russo,et al.  The distortion of information to support an emerging evaluation of risk , 2011 .

[6]  D. Kahneman Thinking, Fast and Slow , 2011 .

[7]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Conditions for intuitive expertise: a failure to disagree. , 2009, The American psychologist.

[8]  David Hardman,et al.  Judgment and Decision Making: Psychological Perspectives , 2009 .

[9]  J. Elster Explaining Social Behavior: More Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences , 2007 .

[10]  J. Edward Russo,et al.  Information distortion in the evaluation of a single option , 2007 .

[11]  G. Gaus,et al.  Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? , 2007, Perspectives on Politics.

[12]  Michelle Press,et al.  Mistakes were made (but not by me): Why we justify foolish beliefs, bad decisions, and hurtful acts. , 2007 .

[13]  Margaret G. Meloy,et al.  Choosing an Inferior Alternative , 2006, Psychological science.

[14]  Thomas Kida Don't Believe Everything You Think: The 6 Basic Mistakes We Make in Thinking , 2006 .

[15]  S. Huffmon Expert Political Judgment: How Good Is It? How Can We Know? , 2006 .

[16]  Thomas Oberlechner Psychology of Judgment and Decision-Making , 2006 .

[17]  S. Read,et al.  The redux of cognitive consistency theories: evidence judgments by constraint satisfaction. , 2004, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[18]  T. Wilson Strangers to Ourselves: Discovering the Adaptive Unconscious , 2002 .

[19]  Paul J. H. Schoemaker,et al.  Profiting from uncertainty : strategies for succeeding no matter what the future brings , 2002 .

[20]  W. Grove,et al.  Clinical versus mechanical prediction: a meta-analysis. , 2000, Psychological assessment.

[21]  J S Hammond,et al.  The hidden traps in decision making. , 1999, Clinical laboratory management review : official publication of the Clinical Laboratory Management Association.

[22]  Whitecotton,et al.  Improving Predictive Accuracy with a Combination of Human Intuition and Mechanical Decision Aids. , 1998, Organizational behavior and human decision processes.

[23]  Paul Goodwin,et al.  Decision Analysis for Management Judgment , 1998 .

[24]  M. Bazerman Judgment in Managerial Decision Making , 1990 .

[25]  J. Kagan,et al.  Rational choice in an uncertain world , 1988 .

[26]  M. Lepper,et al.  Considering the opposite: a corrective strategy for social judgment. , 1984, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[27]  Craig A. Anderson,et al.  INOCULATION AND COUNTEREXPLANATION:DEBIASH"G TECHNIQUES IN THEPERSEVERANCE OF SOCIAL THEORIES , 1982 .

[28]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Reasons for confidence. , 1980 .