The Webinar Integration Tool: A Framework for Promoting Active Learning in Blended Environments

This paper describes a three-stage process of developing a webinar integration tool to enhance the interaction of teaching and learning in blended environments. In the context of medical education, we emphasize three factors of effective webinar integration in blended learning: fostering better solutions for faculty and students to interact virtually; enhancing blended learning using webinars as flipped mini-lectures; and promoting the 4Es Learning Cycle (engagement, exploration, explanation, and extension) through webinars. With the development of a webinar integration tool, we propose an implementation framework based on four guiding principles: (1) technology considerations: matching the tool features with tasks, (2) planning with the perspective of participatory theories of learning, (3) promoting active learning with the 4Es Learning Cycle model, and (4) identifying factors for effective learning through webinar. The three-stage process includes: conducting a needs assessment and training sessions to ensure prerequisite skills for attending and hosting a webinar session, collecting baseline data on overall uses and perceptions of webinars, and applying the results of stages 1 and 2 to the development of a webinar integration tool. Our goal is to identify best practices for integrating webinar technologies in medical education, and assist faculty in aligning course objectives with appropriate webinar activities. Through formative evaluation and continuous improvement of our framework, our broader goal and contribution to the field is to encourage the development and sharing of domain-specific practical strategies for webinar integration, and strategies for designing compelling blended learning and teaching experiences.

[1]  Charoula Angeli An Instructional Model for Transforming Science Education Method Courses with Technology , 2004 .

[2]  Scott Brown How to Keep Your Campus Safe from Infection , 2005 .

[3]  N. Hoffart Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory , 2000 .

[4]  Zane L. Berge,et al.  Designing Discussion Questions for Online, Adult Learning. , 2000 .

[5]  Barbara Means,et al.  Evaluation of Evidence-Based Practices in Online Learning: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Online Learning Studies , 2009 .

[6]  Larry Cuban,et al.  High Access and Low Use of Technologies in High School Classrooms: Explaining an Apparent Paradox , 2001 .

[7]  Cheng-Chang Pan,et al.  Promoting Synchronous Interaction in an eLearning Environment , 2005 .

[8]  Sarah M. Butzin Using Instructional Technology in Transformed Learning Environments , 2001 .

[9]  Shiang-Kwei Wang,et al.  Use of the Webinar Tool (Elluminate) to Support Training: The Effects of Webinar-Learning Implementation from Student-Trainers' Perspective , 2008 .

[10]  Bruce O. Barker,et al.  Broadening the Definition of Distance Education in Light of the New Telecommunications Technologies. , 1989 .

[11]  J. Carleo,et al.  Meeting Extension Programming Needs with Technology: A Case Study of Agritourism Webinars , 2011, Journal of Extension.

[12]  Christopher O'Mahony,et al.  Getting the information and communications technology formula right: access + ability = confident use , 2003 .

[13]  Paul G. Shotsberger The Human Touch: Synchronous Communication in Web-Based Learning. , 2000 .

[14]  Prashant Bordia,et al.  Multiple Determinants of Media Choice: The Role of Symbolic Cues and Contextual Constraints , 2003 .

[15]  Patricia Rogers Barriers to Adopting Emerging Technologies in Education , 2000 .

[16]  Barbara Means,et al.  Learning Online: What Research Tells Us About Whether, When and How , 2014 .

[17]  Henry Jenkins Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century , 2006 .

[18]  Yiasemina Karagiorgi Throwing Light into the Black Box of Implementation: ICT in Cyprus Elementary Schools , 2005 .