Comparison of Four Breast Tissue Segmentation Algorithms for Multi-modal MRI to X-ray Mammography Registration

Breast MRI to X-ray mammography registration usingpatient-specific biomechanical models is one challenging task in medical imaging. To solve this problem, the accurate knowledge about internal and external factors of the breast, such as internal tissues distribution, is needed for modelling a suitable physical behavior. In this work, we compare four different tissue segmentation algorithms, two intensity-based segmentation algorithms Fuzzy C-means and Gaussian mixture model and two improvements that incorporate spatial information Kernelized Fuzzy C-means and Markov Random Fields, respectively, and analyze their effect to the multi-modal registration. The overall framework consists on using a density estimation software Volpara$$^{TM}$$ to extract the glandular tissue from full-field digital mammograms, meanwhile, a biomechanical model is used to mimic the mammographic acquisition from the MRI, computing the glandular tissue traversed by the X-ray beam. Results with 40 patients show a high agreement between the amount of glandular tissue computed for each method.

[1]  Scott D. Roth,et al.  Ray casting for modeling solids , 1982, Comput. Graph. Image Process..

[2]  Brian B. Avants,et al.  N4ITK: Improved N3 Bias Correction , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  Martin O. Leach,et al.  A method for the comparison of biomechanical breast models , 2001, Proceedings IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis (MMBIA 2001).

[4]  Anil V. Rao,et al.  GPOPS-II , 2014, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[5]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Volumetric Breast Density Estimation from Full-Field Digital Mammograms: A Validation Study , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  Mark F McEntee,et al.  Mammographic Breast Density Assessment Using Automated Volumetric Software and Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) Categorization by Expert Radiologists. , 2016, Academic radiology.

[7]  Zhongdong Wu,et al.  Fuzzy C-means clustering algorithm based on kernel method , 2003, Proceedings Fifth International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications. ICCIMA 2003.

[8]  Nico Karssemeijer,et al.  Robust Breast Composition Measurement - VolparaTM , 2010, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[9]  Torsten Hopp,et al.  Fusion of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance mammography at 3.0T with X-ray mammograms: pilot study evaluation using dedicated semi-automatic registration software. , 2011, European journal of radiology.

[10]  James M. Keller,et al.  Fuzzy Models and Algorithms for Pattern Recognition and Image Processing , 1999 .

[11]  Hang Si,et al.  TetGen, a Delaunay-Based Quality Tetrahedral Mesh Generator , 2015, ACM Trans. Math. Softw..

[12]  Torsten Hopp,et al.  2D/3D Registration for Localization of Mammographically Depicted Lesions in Breast MRI , 2012, Digital Mammography / IWDM.

[13]  Sébastien Ourselin,et al.  NiftySim: A GPU-based nonlinear finite element package for simulation of soft tissue biomechanics , 2014, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[14]  S. Wurdinger,et al.  Comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography , 2000, Breast Cancer Research.

[15]  Lianghao Han,et al.  Development of patient-specific biomechanical models for predicting large breast deformation , 2012, Physics in medicine and biology.

[16]  Torsten Hopp,et al.  Image fusion of Ultrasound Computer Tomography volumes with X-ray mammograms using a biomechanical model based 2D/3D registration , 2015, Comput. Medical Imaging Graph..