The Role of Supervised Driving Requirements in a Graduated Driver Licensing Programs

Many States require parents to certify that their teens have completed a certain amount of supervised driving practice, usually 40 to 50 hours, before they are permitted to obtain an intermediate license. Although strongly supported by numerous groups and organizations, the effectiveness of supervised practice requirements is unknown. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) conducted a cross-sectional comparison of fatal crash rates throughout the United States, and examined State crash data using interrupted time-series analysis in a small number of States that had increased their required number of supervised driving hours. To supplement and provide insight into these findings, the University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center conducted telephone interviews, funded by State Farm Insurance, with parents of newly licensed teenage drivers in 5 States (Maryland, Minnesota, Ohio, South Carolina, and Washington) with varying supervised driving requirements. Employees of licensing bureaus in these States were also contacted by telephone to determine how they conveyed the requirements to parents and teenagers. Analyses of the Fatality Analysis Reporting System (FARS) showed that fatal crash rates of 16- and 17-year-olds did not differ across States with varying supervised driving requirements. Crash analyses in Minnesota, the only State to change the number of required practice hours without changing other Graduated Driver Licensing (GDL) components, did not find any difference in 16- and 17-year-old-driver fatal or serious injury crash rates following the change in the requirement. Interviews with parents and licensing officials showed that awareness of the supervised driving requirements was weak in all 5 States. Only 32% of parents overall (range 15% to 55%) could correctly identify the number of hours required by their State. Almost all parents in Maryland (91%) reported using a log provided by the licensing agency to keep track of their teens’ driving and about half of Maryland parents correctly reported the number of required supervised hours. With low parental awareness and little or no licensing agency verification, it is difficult to determine whether teenagers drove the minimum number of supervised hours required by their States. These findings suggest that improvements in communications with parents and novice drivers about supervised driving requirements, guidance to parents about the best techniques to provide supervision, and tracking actual hours and conditions of supervised driving would be beneficial.

[1]  Joel Slemrod,et al.  The fatal toll of driving to drink: the effect of minimum legal drinking age evasion on traffic fatalities. , 2010, Journal of health economics.

[2]  David F. Preusser,et al.  DETERMINE WHY THERE ARE FEWER YOUNG ALCOHOL-IMPAIRED DRIVERS , 2001 .

[3]  S. Daniel,et al.  National Highway Traffic Safety Administration , 2020, Federal Regulatory Guide.

[4]  Richard A. Davis,et al.  Introduction to time series and forecasting , 1998 .

[5]  N P Gregersen EVALUATION OF 16-YEARS AGE LIMIT FOR DRIVER TRAINING , 1997 .

[6]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Licensing Age and Teenage Driver Crashes: A Review of the Evidence , 2009, Traffic injury prevention.

[7]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Driving experience, crashes and traffic citations of teenage beginning drivers. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Robert D. Foss,et al.  Guidance for Implementation of the AASHTO Strategic Highway Safety Plan. Volume 19: A Guide for Reducing Collisions Involving Young Drivers , 2007 .

[9]  Anne T McCartt,et al.  Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[10]  Susan Pardee Baker,et al.  Nationwide Review of Graduated Driver Licensing , 2007 .

[11]  David C Grabowski,et al.  The strength of graduated drivers license programs and fatalities among teen drivers and passengers. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[12]  B Simons-Morton,et al.  Parent involvement in novice teen driving: a review of the literature , 2006, Injury Prevention.

[13]  David F. Preusser,et al.  Analysis of the fatal crash involvements of 15-year-old drivers , 1997 .

[14]  Young Drivers Traffic Safety Facts, 2010 Data: Young Drivers. , 2014, Annals of emergency medicine.

[15]  Divera A M Twisk,et al.  Trends in young driver risk and countermeasures in European countries. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[16]  Richard A. Berk,et al.  Applied Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences , 1980 .

[17]  Daniel R Mayhew,et al.  Changes in collision rates among novice drivers during the first months of driving. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[18]  Donald G. Freeman,et al.  Drunk Driving Legislation and Traffic Fatalities: New Evidence on BAC 08 Laws , 2007 .

[19]  Robert D Foss,et al.  Improving graduated driver licensing systems: a conceptual approach and its implications. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[20]  Jean T. Shope,et al.  Parental Views of and Experience with Michigan's Graduated Licensing Program , 2000 .

[21]  E R Braver,et al.  Carrying passengers as a risk factor for crashes fatal to 16- and 17-year-old drivers. , 2000, JAMA.

[22]  Allan F Williams,et al.  Specific and Long-Term Effects of Nova Scotia's Graduated Licensing Program , 2003, Traffic injury prevention.

[23]  James Nichols,et al.  Evaluation of Oregon's Graduated Driver Licensing Program , 2007 .

[24]  Robert D Foss,et al.  Parental Supervision of Teenage Drivers in a Graduated Licensing System , 2006, Traffic injury prevention.

[25]  N P Gregersen,et al.  Sixteen years age limit for learner drivers in Sweden--an evaluation of safety effects. , 2000, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Ezra Hauer,et al.  Observational Before-After Studies in Road Safety , 1997 .

[27]  P. Zador,et al.  Fatal Crash Involvement and Laws against Alcohol-Impaired Driving , 1989, Journal of public health policy.

[28]  Alexander C Wagenaar,et al.  Effects of lowering the legal BAC to 0.08 on single-vehicle-nighttime fatal traffic crashes in 19 jurisdictions. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[29]  Teresa M Senserrick,et al.  Recent developments in young driver education, training and licensing in Australia. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[30]  A. Wagenaar,et al.  Effects of drivers' license suspension policies on alcohol-related crash involvement: long-term follow-up in forty-six states. , 2007, Alcoholism, clinical and experimental research.

[31]  David C Grabowski,et al.  Graduated driver licensing and teen traffic fatalities. , 2005, Journal of health economics.

[32]  Guohua Li,et al.  National Evaluation of Graduated Driver Licensing Programs , 2006 .

[33]  Amy L. Tobler,et al.  General deterrence effects of U.S. statutory DUI fine and jail penalties: long-term follow-up in 32 states. , 2007, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[34]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 2002, Technometrics.

[35]  N. Schuster,et al.  American Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators , 2011 .

[36]  Thomas S. Dee,et al.  Does setting limits save lives? The case of 0.08 BAC laws , 2001 .

[37]  J. Weiss,et al.  The Teen Driver , 2006, Pediatrics.

[38]  Alexander C Wagenaar,et al.  Effects of legal BAC limits on fatal crash involvement: analyses of 28 states from 1976 through 2002. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[39]  Claire Laberge-Nadeau,et al.  The Role of Driver Education in the Licensing Process in Quebec , 2006, Traffic Injury Prevention.

[40]  P. O'Malley,et al.  Lowered legal blood alcohol limits for young drivers: effects on drinking, driving, and driving-after-drinking behaviors in 30 states. , 2001, American journal of public health.

[41]  1984 DRIVER LICENSE. ADMINISTRATION REQUIREMENTS AND FEES , 1984 .