PET/CT supports breast cancer diagnosis and treatment

The application of positron emission tomography with 18F fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose (FDG-PET) has remarkably improved the management of cancer patients. However, some caution is necessary in the interpretation of FDG-PET images. Because of its low spatial resolution, it is difficult to identify the anatomical location of radiotracer uptake and to distinguish between normal physiological accumulation and pathological uptake. A novel combined PET/CT system has been developed that improves the capacity to correctly localize and interpret FDG uptake. Although only a few studies have been conducted on the potential role of PET/CT in the management of breast cancer patients, the advantage of this modality compared with PET alone should be relevant for application in the field of breast cancer. In this review, we describe the clinical impact of PET/CT on breast cancer diagnosis compared with PET alone with respect to disease restaging, treatment monitoring, preoperative staging and primary diagnosis. In addition, the possible role of PET/CT with iodine contrast is noted for evaluation of intra-ductal spreading.

[1]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  Optimization of transmission and emission scan duration in 3D whole-body PET , 1996 .

[2]  Habib Zaidi,et al.  Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[3]  Michael Bader,et al.  Early prediction of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer using sequential 18F-FDG PET. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[4]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[5]  David W Townsend,et al.  PET/CT today and tomorrow. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[6]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Utility of PET in Breast Cancer. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.

[7]  P F Sharp,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[8]  M. Phelps,et al.  Accuracy of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[9]  U. Pietrzyk,et al.  Qualitative [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in primary breast cancer: clinical relevance and practicability , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  J E Mortimer,et al.  Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[11]  Yoshinobu Sato,et al.  3D imaging of intraductal spread of breast cancer and its clinical application for navigation surgery , 2002, Breast cancer.

[12]  B. Siegel,et al.  PET in breast cancer. , 1998, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[13]  G. K. von Schulthess,et al.  Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system , 2000, European Radiology.

[14]  M. Schwaiger,et al.  Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  P. Mikosch,et al.  Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions. , 2003, Breast.

[16]  J. Czernin FDG-PET in breast cancer: a different view of its clinical usefulness. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.

[17]  E. Nitzsche,et al.  Ganzkörper-Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie beim Mammakarzinom , 1993 .

[18]  Thomas Beyer,et al.  X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.

[19]  D. Noh,et al.  Diagnostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography for Detecting Breast Cancer , 1998, World Journal of Surgery.

[20]  H. Schirrmeister,et al.  Fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with the standard staging procedures , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[21]  R. Collins,et al.  Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials , 2005, The Lancet.

[22]  M Schwaiger,et al.  Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[23]  J. Nährig,et al.  Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[24]  J L Sunshine,et al.  Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. , 1993, Radiology.

[25]  Søren Holm,et al.  Estimation of the noise contributions from blank, transmission and emission scans in PET , 1995 .

[26]  M. Greco,et al.  Prospective evaluation of fluorine-18-FDG PET in presurgical staging of the axilla in breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[27]  H. Biersack,et al.  Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile scintimammography in the detection of breast tumours , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[28]  R. Wahl,et al.  Positron-emission tomographic scanning of primary and metastatic breast carcinoma with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.

[29]  E. Bombardieri,et al.  PET imaging in breast cancer. , 2001, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.

[30]  I. Fogelman,et al.  The role of positron emission tomography in the management of bone metastases , 2000, Cancer.

[31]  T. Oyama,et al.  The relationship between FDG uptake in PET scans and biological behavior in breast cancer , 2007, Breast cancer.