PET/CT supports breast cancer diagnosis and treatment
暂无分享,去创建一个
Koji Murakami | Shingo Hagiwara | Mitsuhiro Hayashi | K. Murakami | M. Hayashi | Testsunari Oyama | Yasushi Domeki | Daisuke Katsumata | Masakatsu Sunagawa | M. Sunagawa | Daisuke Katsumata | Shingo Hagiwara | Yasushi Domeki | T. Oyama
[1] Thomas Beyer,et al. Optimization of transmission and emission scan duration in 3D whole-body PET , 1996 .
[2] Habib Zaidi,et al. Determination of the attenuation map in emission tomography. , 2003, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[3] Michael Bader,et al. Early prediction of response to chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer using sequential 18F-FDG PET. , 2005, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[4] M Schwaiger,et al. Assessment of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer patients with positron emission tomography using radiolabeled 2-(fluorine-18)-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose. , 1996, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[5] David W Townsend,et al. PET/CT today and tomorrow. , 2004, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[6] M. Schwaiger,et al. Utility of PET in Breast Cancer. , 1999, Clinical positron imaging : official journal of the Institute for Clinical P.E.T.
[7] P F Sharp,et al. Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]-fluorodeoxy-D-glucose to predict the pathologic response of breast cancer to primary chemotherapy. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[8] M. Phelps,et al. Accuracy of whole-body fluorine-18-FDG PET for the detection of recurrent or metastatic breast carcinoma. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[9] U. Pietrzyk,et al. Qualitative [18F]FDG positron emission tomography in primary breast cancer: clinical relevance and practicability , 1996, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[10] J E Mortimer,et al. Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[11] Yoshinobu Sato,et al. 3D imaging of intraductal spread of breast cancer and its clinical application for navigation surgery , 2002, Breast cancer.
[12] B. Siegel,et al. PET in breast cancer. , 1998, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[13] G. K. von Schulthess,et al. Cost considerations regarding an integrated CT-PET system , 2000, European Radiology.
[14] M. Schwaiger,et al. Breast imaging with positron emission tomography and fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose: use and limitations. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[15] P. Mikosch,et al. Comparison of FDG-PET and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the evaluation of suggestive breast lesions. , 2003, Breast.
[16] J. Czernin. FDG-PET in breast cancer: a different view of its clinical usefulness. , 2002, Molecular imaging and biology : MIB : the official publication of the Academy of Molecular Imaging.
[17] E. Nitzsche,et al. Ganzkörper-Positronen-Emissions-Tomographie beim Mammakarzinom , 1993 .
[18] Thomas Beyer,et al. X-ray-based attenuation correction for positron emission tomography/computed tomography scanners. , 2003, Seminars in nuclear medicine.
[19] D. Noh,et al. Diagnostic Value of Positron Emission Tomography for Detecting Breast Cancer , 1998, World Journal of Surgery.
[20] H. Schirrmeister,et al. Fluorine-18 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: comparison with the standard staging procedures , 2001, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[21] R. Collins,et al. Effects of radiotherapy and of differences in the extent of surgery for early breast cancer on local recurrence and 15-year survival: an overview of the randomised trials , 2005, The Lancet.
[22] M Schwaiger,et al. Metabolic characterization of breast tumors with positron emission tomography using F-18 fluorodeoxyglucose. , 1996, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[23] J. Nährig,et al. Positron emission tomography using [(18)F]Fluorodeoxyglucose for monitoring primary chemotherapy in breast cancer. , 2000, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.
[24] J L Sunshine,et al. Evaluation of breast masses and axillary lymph nodes with [F-18] 2-deoxy-2-fluoro-D-glucose PET. , 1993, Radiology.
[25] Søren Holm,et al. Estimation of the noise contributions from blank, transmission and emission scans in PET , 1995 .
[26] M. Greco,et al. Prospective evaluation of fluorine-18-FDG PET in presurgical staging of the axilla in breast cancer. , 1998, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.
[27] H. Biersack,et al. Comparison of fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography and technetium-99m methoxyisobutylisonitrile scintimammography in the detection of breast tumours , 1997, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine.
[28] R. Wahl,et al. Positron-emission tomographic scanning of primary and metastatic breast carcinoma with the radiolabeled glucose analogue 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-D-glucose. , 1991, The New England journal of medicine.
[29] E. Bombardieri,et al. PET imaging in breast cancer. , 2001, The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology.
[30] I. Fogelman,et al. The role of positron emission tomography in the management of bone metastases , 2000, Cancer.
[31] T. Oyama,et al. The relationship between FDG uptake in PET scans and biological behavior in breast cancer , 2007, Breast cancer.