Converting knowledge into sustainability performance of freight villages

Along with the globalization of industry and trade, the importance of freight villages (FVs) greatly grows due to the substantial benefits they can generate, such as supply chain management efficiency, intensive provision of logistics services, modal shift, regional economic growth and employment, lower energy consumption, and environmental consequences. Hence, the sustainability performance tends to become a strategic goal that FVs’ operators and decision makers (e.g., transport agents, warehouse providers and freight forwarders, logistics operators, and FV management company) endeavor to achieve. However, due to the lack of a systematic approach toward FVs sustainable development, existing literature has not yet clearly defined what strategic direction should be followed to pursue such a goal. This article proposes a knowledge-related approach to promote sustainability performance of FVs. This article highlights sustainability as a strategic goal of FVs rooting in the evidences from academia and practical cases. In addition, it explains the principle of ensuring sustainability by FVs with twofold meanings. Meanwhile, it summarizes the sustainability dimensions in the context of FVs. After introducing the significances of knowledge assets and knowledge management (KM) approach to the sustainability drawing on the implications from sustainability balanced scorecard (SBSC), it analyses KM characteristics in logistics and FVs area. Then, how the general KM process (knowledge acquisition, sharing, and application) act on FVs sustainable development is clarified. In which, the sustainability-related stakeholders of FVs are identified. Finally, it proposes a roadmap of organizing KM for sustainability-oriented FVs considering the distinct features of KM in FVs context. To support the success of this roadmap, this article recognizes two key elements including human ability and stakeholders’ involvement. Furthermore, a checklist for building FVs sustainability capability based on SBSC is provided, which is hopefully being a referring guidance for FVs’ operators and decision makers.

[1]  L. Argote,et al.  KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER: A BASIS FOR COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE IN FIRMS , 2000 .

[2]  Rob Zuidwijk,et al.  The extended gate concept for container terminals: Expanding the notion of dry ports , 2012 .

[3]  Tourism Division,et al.  Review of developments in transport in Asia and the Pacific , 2005 .

[4]  A. o'sullivan.  Economics Principles in Action , 2001 .

[5]  Claude Comtois,et al.  Intermodal freight terminals: locality and industrial linkages , 2001 .

[6]  Ioan Fazey,et al.  Integrating local and scientific knowledge for environmental management. , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  P. Bansal.  Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development , 2005 .

[8]  Terry L. Esper,et al.  LOGISTICS LEARNING CAPABILITY: SUSTAINING THE COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE GAINED THROUGH LOGISTICS LEVERAGE , 2007 .

[9]  Henry Etzkowitz,et al.  Universities and the global knowledge economy , 1997 .

[10]  Peter Nijkamp,et al.  Sustainable cities in Europe : a comparative analysis of urban energy-environmental policies , 1994 .

[11]  Christopher D. Higgins,et al.  An Exploration of the Freight Village Concept and its Applicability to Ontario , 2011 .

[12]  The Role of Freight Villages to the Development of the Balkan Region. The Case of Promachon Freight Village (Greek Bulgarian Borders) , 2006 .

[13]  Toru Nakamura.  WHITE PAPER, European transport policy for 2010 : time to decide , 2004 .

[14]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  Freight village evaluation under uncertainty with public and private financing , 2003 .

[15]  Kevin C. Desouza,et al.  Strategic contributions of game rooms to knowledge management: some prelimenary insights , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[16]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  A Triple Helix of University—Industry—Government Relations , 1998, Scientometrics.

[17]  Dorothy E. Leidner,et al.  Review: Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues , 2001, MIS Q..

[18]  Jörg Andriof,et al.  Perspectives on Corporate Citizenship , 2017 .

[19]  Sharon J. Williams,et al.  A study of dry port development in China , 2012 .

[20]  William R. King,et al.  Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning , 2009, Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning.

[21]  Catrin Lammgård,et al.  Environmental Perspectives on Marketing of freight Transports , 2007 .

[22]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[23]  S. Lanka.,et al.  ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMISSION FOR ASIA AND THE PACIFIC , 2010 .

[24]  D. Walker,et al.  Extending knowledge management across the supply chains in the construction industry : knowledge sharing in construction supply chains , 2003 .

[25]  Mary Sumner,et al.  Knowledge management: theory and practice , 1999, SIGCPR '99.

[26]  Dong-Wook Song,et al.  Knowledge management for maritime logistics value: discussing conceptual issues , 2010 .

[27]  Neil Rotheroe,et al.  Local agenda 21; articulating the meaning of sustainable development at the level of the individual enterprise , 2003 .

[28]  Jaap Vleugel.  Modelling goods city distribution in the Netherlands , 2004 .

[29]  Ralf Elbert,et al.  Adapting Dynamic Logistics Processes and Networks: Advantages Through Regional Logistics Clusters , 2009, LDIC.

[30]  G. Huber.  Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures , 1991 .

[31]  Eiichi Taniguchi,et al.  Summary of the OECD report ‘Delivering the Goods-21st Century Challenges to Urban Goods Transport’ , 2004 .

[32]  S. Schaltegger,et al.  Nachhaltig managen mit der Balanced Scorecard , 2002 .

[33]  김성문,et al.  [해외 대학 연구센터 소개] Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey , 2012 .

[34]  E. Leal.  Logistics platforms as a pivotal element in competitiveness and sustainability , 2011 .

[35]  H. Creech,et al.  Strategic intentions : managing knowledge networks for sustainable development , 2001 .

[36]  Paula Antunes,et al.  From environmental performance evaluation to eco-efficiency and sustainability balanced scorecards , 2002 .

[37]  Toshinori Nemoto,et al.  URBAN FREIGHT TRANSPORT POLICY AND PLANNING , 1999 .

[38]  T. Wilbanks,et al.  Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[39]  P. Starr.  Economics : principles in action , 1978 .

[40]  R. Freeman.  Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach , 2010 .

[41]  A. C. Santos,et al.  The balanced scorecard as an integrated model applied to the Portuguese public service: a case study in the waste sector , 2012 .

[42]  Fred Jp Heuer,et al.  Summary of the OECD Report 'Delivering the Goods--21st Century Challenges to Urban Goods Transport' , 2004 .

[43]  S. Massa,et al.  A knowledge management approach to organizational competitive advantage: Evidence from the food sector , 2009 .

[44]  Dimitrios A Tsamboulas,et al.  Multicriteria Approach to the Evaluation of Intermodal Freight Villages , 2005 .

[45]  Marina Bährle-Rapp.  directions for use , 2007 .

[46]  S. Schaltegger,et al.  The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard – linking sustainability management to business strategy , 2002 .

[47]  Robert Ries,et al.  Environmental decision making in multi-stakeholder contexts: applicability of life cycle thinking in development planning and implementation , 2009 .

[48]  Kazi Jalal..  The role of united nations economic and social commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP). , 1985 .

[49]  Florian Lüdeke-Freund,et al.  The sustainability balanced scorecard , 2018, Measuring and Controlling Sustainability.