High frequency oscillations in the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEP's) are mainly due to phase-resetting phenomena

A small series of high frequency oscillations (HFOs) overlapping the earliest part of the N20 wave can be observed in the somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs) of normal subjects. We tried to elucidate whether these high frequency components are mainly due to phase-resetting phenomena, to the emergence of new oscillations related to the stimuli, or to a combination of both. Averaged median-nerve SSEPs from seven healthy subjects were studied by means of time-frequency analysis. The presence of new oscillatory activities was evaluated by averaging the energy of the single-trial time-frequency transforms in the HFOs range (400-1000 Hz). To study phase-resetting phenomena, we measured inter-trial coherence (ITC) in the same frequency range. A marked inter-trial coherence related to the HFOs was found, whereas energy changes (related to the emergence of new oscillations) were minimal. The combination of these three different approaches suggests that the HFOs are mainly due to resettings of the ongoing EEG activity originated in response to the stimuli. The emergence of new activities does not seem to be a relevant mechanism in the formation of these components.

[1]  G Curio,et al.  Different origins of low- and high-frequency components (600 Hz) of human somatosensory evoked potentials , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[2]  G Pfurtscheller,et al.  Event-related coherence as a tool for studying dynamic interaction of brain regions. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[3]  E Urrestarazu,et al.  Potentials evoked by chirp-modulated tones: a new technique to evaluate oscillatory activity in the auditory pathway , 2004, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  Sayers Bm,et al.  Objective evaluation of auditory evoked EEG responses. , 1974 .

[5]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Dynamic Brain Sources of Visual Evoked Responses , 2002, Science.

[6]  J. Pernier,et al.  Stimulus Specificity of Phase-Locked and Non-Phase-Locked 40 Hz Visual Responses in Human , 1996, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[7]  KARL PEARSON,et al.  The Problem of the Random Walk , 1905, Nature.

[8]  James M Kilner,et al.  Event-related brain dynamics , 2002, Trends in Neurosciences.

[9]  Anders M. Dale,et al.  Spectral spatiotemporal imaging of cortical oscillations and interactions in the human brain , 2004, NeuroImage.

[10]  Gabriel Curio,et al.  Functional dissociation of a subcortical and cortical component of high-frequency oscillations in human somatosensory evoked potentials by motor interference , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[11]  J. Haueisen,et al.  Multiplicity in the high-frequency signals during the short-latency somatosensory evoked cortical activity in humans , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[12]  B. MCA. SAVERS,et al.  The Mechanism of Auditory Evoked EEG Responses , 1974, Nature.

[13]  New laboratory start-up in the 21st century. , 2002 .

[14]  Domenico Restuccia,et al.  Dissociated changes of somatosensory evoked low-frequency scalp responses and 600 Hz bursts after single-dose administration of lorazepam , 2002, Brain Research.

[15]  G Curio,et al.  High-frequency (600 Hz) SEP activities originating in the subcortical and cortical human somatosensory system. , 1997, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[16]  G Curio,et al.  Linking 600-Hz “Spikelike” EEG/MEG Wavelets (“&sfgr;-Bursts”) to Cellular Substrates: Concepts and Caveats , 2000, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[17]  Stiliyan Kalitzin,et al.  Enhancement of phase clustering in the EEG/MEG gamma frequency band anticipates transitions to paroxysmal epileptiform activity in epileptic patients with known visual sensitivity , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[18]  A Aertsen,et al.  Dynamic synchronization between multiple cortical motor areas and muscle activity in phasic voluntary movements. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  Lalu Mansinha,et al.  Localization of the complex spectrum: the S transform , 1996, IEEE Trans. Signal Process..

[20]  M. S. John,et al.  MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[21]  A. Labarga,et al.  Frontal and central oscillatory changes related to different aspects of the motor process: a study in go/no-go paradigms , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  T Imada,et al.  Somatic evoked high-frequency magnetic oscillations reflect activity of inhibitory interneurons in the human somatosensory cortex. , 1996, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[23]  R. Hari,et al.  Phase locking between human primary and secondary somatosensory cortices , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[24]  Robert Chen,et al.  Very fast oscillations evoked by median nerve stimulation in the human thalamus and subthalamic nucleus. , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  J. Martinerie,et al.  The brainweb: Phase synchronization and large-scale integration , 2001, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[26]  V I Nekorkin,et al.  Self-referential phase reset based on inferior olive oscillator dynamics , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Isao Hashimoto,et al.  Dipole orientation differs between high frequency oscillations and N20m current sources in human somatosensory evoked magnetic fields to median nerve stimulation , 2001, Neuroscience Letters.

[28]  MansinhaL..  Localization of the complex spectrum , 1996 .

[29]  G. Curio,et al.  Differential gating of slow postsynaptic and high-frequency spike-like components in human somatosensory evoked potentials under isometric motor interference , 2001, Brain Research.

[30]  G. Reid.  The Causation of Variations , 1905, Nature.

[31]  A. Hashizume,et al.  Effects of movement on somatosensory N20m fields and high-frequency oscillations , 2002, Neuroreport.

[32]  G. Curio,et al.  Thalamic and cortical high-frequency (600 Hz) somatosensory-evoked potential (SEP) components are modulated by slight arousal changes in awake subjects , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.