The perception of briefly exposed visual forms is shown to be masked by an after- coming random pattern stimulus of approximately equal intensity. This effect occurs only under certain well defined conditions; it is limited by the minimum stimulus exposure time in excess of threshold which overcomes masking (critical stimulus duration) as well as by the minimum interval between presentation of the two stimuli which permits evasion of the masking action (critical interval). Over the range of stimulus duration in which masking occurs, critical interval varied with stimulus duration in such a way that the interval multiplied by the stimulus duration equals a constant. Critical stimulus duration and critical interval at threshold are shown to vary little under a variety of conditions. The effect of the random pattern stimulus is limited to the part of the visual field to which it is presented.
[1]
Henri Piéron.
I. Recherches expérimentales sur la marge de variation du temps de latence de la sensation lumineuse (par une méthode de masquage)
,
1925
.
[2]
H. Piéron.
I. L'évanouissement de la sensation lumineuse
,
1934
.
[3]
M MONNIER,et al.
Retinal, cortical and motor responses to photic stimulation in man; retino-cortical time and opto-motor integration time.
,
1952,
Journal of neurophysiology.
[4]
Miscellanea: A Random Pattern Screen
,
1957
.
[5]
D. Broadbent.
Perception and communication
,
1958
.
[6]
M. Eden,et al.
Note on Short Term Storage of Information in Vision
,
1964,
Perceptual and motor skills.