Assessing the Impact of Carbon Tax Differentiation in the European Union

To what extent do the welfare costs associated with the implementation of the Burden Sharing Agreement in the European Union depend on sectoral allocation of emissions rights? What are the prospects for strategic climate policy to favor domestic production? This paper attempts to answer those questions using a CGE model featuring a detailed representation of the European economies. First, numerical simulations show that equalizing marginal abatement costs across domestic sectors greatly reduces the burden of the emissions constraint but also that other allocations may be preferable for some countries because of pre-existing tax distortions. Second, we show that the effect of a single country's attempt to undertake a strategic policy to limit impacts on its domestic energy-intensive industries has mixed effects. Exempting energy-intensive industries from the reduction program is a costly solution to maintain the international competitiveness of these industries; a tax-cum-subsidy approach is shown to be better than exemption policy to sustain exports. The welfare impact either policy – exemption or subsidy – on other European countries is likely to be small because of general equilibrium effects.

[1]  A. Ellerman,et al.  Tradable permits for greenhouse gas emissions : a primer with particular reference to Europe , 2000 .

[2]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  CO2 Emissions Limits: Economic Adjustments and the Distribution of Burdens , 1997 .

[3]  Laurent Viguier,et al.  Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Fair Trade and Harmonization of Climate Change Policies in Europe , 2000 .

[4]  I. Wing,et al.  Supplementarity: An Invitation to Monopsony? , 2000 .

[5]  A. Denny Ellerman,et al.  Analysis of post-Kyoto CO₂ emissions trading using marginal abatement curves , 1998 .

[6]  I. Wing,et al.  Adjustment Time, Capital Malleability and Policy Cost , 1999 .

[7]  H. Jacoby,et al.  Effects of Differentiating Climate Policy by Sector: A U.S. Example , 2000 .

[8]  Henry D. Jacoby,et al.  Mit Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change Change Developing Country Effects of Kyoto-type Emissions Restrictions Developing Country Effects of Kyoto-type Emissions Restrictions , 2022 .

[9]  L. Goulder,et al.  Optimal Environmental Taxation in the Presence of Other Taxes: General Equilibrium Analyses , 1994 .

[10]  Patrick Criqui,et al.  Marginal abatement costs of CO2 emission reductions, geographical flexibility and concrete ceilings: an assessment using the POLES model , 1999 .

[11]  R. Mooij,et al.  Environmental Levies and Distortionary Taxation. , 1994 .

[12]  E. Hopkins,et al.  Running to Keep in the Same Place: Consumer Choice as a Game of Status , 2002 .

[13]  John M. Reilly,et al.  The costs of the Kyoto protocol in the European Union , 2003 .

[14]  Scott Barrett,et al.  Strategic environmental policy and intrenational trade , 1994 .

[15]  Ian W. H. Parry,et al.  Pollution Taxes and Revenue Recycling , 1995 .

[16]  John M. Reilly,et al.  The Kyoto Protocol and Developing Countries , 1999 .

[17]  T. Hertel Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications , 1999 .

[18]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  Rethinking the Kyoto Emissions Targets , 2002 .

[19]  P. Criqui,et al.  Kyoto and technology at world level: costs of CO2 reduction under flexibility mechanisms and technical progress , 2000 .

[20]  Warwick J. McKibbin,et al.  Emissions trading, capital flows and the Kyoto protocol , 1999 .

[21]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Japanese nuclear power and the Kyoto agreement , 2000 .

[22]  Jagdish N. Bhagwati,et al.  Domestic Distortions, Tariffs and the Theory of Optimum Subsidy , 1963, Journal of Political Economy.

[23]  Richard S. Eckaus,et al.  The MIT Emissions Prediction and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model : revisions, sensitivities, and comparisons of results , 2001 .

[24]  P. Krugman Domestic Distortions and the Deindustrialization Hypothesis , 1996 .

[25]  T. Rutherford,et al.  Carbon Taxes with Exemptions in an Open Economy: A General Equilibrium Analysis of the German Tax Initiative , 1997 .

[26]  A. Dixit,et al.  The Use of Protection and Subsidies for Entry Promotion and Deterrence , 1985 .