The perception of 3-D shape from shadows cast onto curved surfaces.

In a natural environment, cast shadows abound. Objects cast shadows both upon themselves and upon background surfaces. Previous research on the perception of 3-D shape from cast shadows has only examined the informativeness of shadows cast upon flat background surfaces. In outdoor environments, however, background surfaces often possess significant curvature (large rocks, trees, hills, etc.), and this background curvature distorts the shape of cast shadows. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which observers can "discount" the distorting effects of curved background surfaces. In our experiments, observers viewed deforming or static shadows of naturally shaped objects, which were cast upon flat and curved background surfaces. The results showed that the discrimination of 3-D object shape from cast shadows was generally invariant over the distortions produced by hemispherical background surfaces. The observers often had difficulty, however, in identifying the shadows cast onto saddle-shaped background surfaces. The variations in curvature which occur in different directions on saddle-shaped background surfaces cause shadow distortions that lead to difficulties in object recognition and discrimination.

[1]  A. W. Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes , 2002 .

[2]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The singularities of the visual mapping , 1976, Biological Cybernetics.

[3]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Solid shape , 1990 .

[4]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Silhouette Coherence for Camera Calibration under Circular Motion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[5]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Identification of Everyday Objects on the Basis of Silhouette and Outline Versions , 2007, Perception.

[6]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection theory: A user's guide, 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[7]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  The visual and haptic perception of natural object shape , 2004, Perception & Psychophysics.

[8]  Pascal Mamassian,et al.  Illusory motion from shadows , 1996, Nature.

[9]  J T Todd,et al.  Perception of structure from motion: is projective correspondence of moving elements a necessary condition? , 1985, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  The visual motion of curves and surfaces , 1998, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[11]  J J Koenderink,et al.  What Does the Occluding Contour Tell Us about Solid Shape? , 1984, Perception.

[12]  C. Goodall Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape , 1991 .

[13]  Pat-Anthony Federico,et al.  Measuring recognition performance using computer-based and paper-based methods , 1991 .

[14]  Richard S. Weiss,et al.  Reconstruction of Surfaces from Profiles , 1987, ICCV 1987.

[15]  H. Barlow Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information: David Marr. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman, 1982. pp. xvi + 397 , 1983 .

[16]  Roberto Casati Methodological Issues in the Study of the Depiction of Cast Shadows: A Case Study in the Relationships Between Art and Cognition , 2004 .

[17]  L. Stone Illusory motion. , 1967, The American journal of psychology.

[18]  Thomas E. Dawson,et al.  The Perception and Recognition of Natural Object Shape from Deforming and Static Shadows , 2000, Perception.

[19]  M J Tarr,et al.  Recognizing Silhouettes and Shaded Images across Depth Rotation , 1999, Perception.

[20]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parsing silhouettes: The short-cut rule , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[21]  Michael E. Taylor,et al.  Differential Geometry I , 1994 .

[22]  gombrich-e-h Shadows, the Depiction of Cast Shadows in Western Art , 1995 .

[23]  James T. Todd,et al.  The perception of surface orientation from multiple sources of optical information , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  J. Farley Norman,et al.  Aging preserves the ability to perceive 3D object shape from static but not deforming boundary contours. , 2008, Acta psychologica.

[25]  Ernst Mach,et al.  Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations , 1998 .

[26]  Johan Wagemans,et al.  Perceptual saliency of points along the contour of everyday objects: a large-scale study. , 2010, Perception & psychophysics.

[27]  F. Attneave Some informational aspects of visual perception. , 1954, Psychological review.

[28]  H. Ross,et al.  Information Concentration along the Boundary Contours of Naturally Shaped Solid Objects , 2001, Perception.

[29]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Invariant Recognition of Natural Objects in the Presence of Shadows , 2000, Perception.

[30]  J. Koenderink,et al.  The Shape of Smooth Objects and the Way Contours End , 1982, Perception.

[31]  P. Tse A contour propagation approach to surface filling-in and volume formation. , 2001, Psychological review.

[32]  J. Wagemans,et al.  Segmentation of object outlines into parts: A large-scale integrative study , 2006, Cognition.

[33]  W. Miles Movement Interpretations of the Silhouette of a Revolving Fan , 1931 .

[34]  Paulo R. S. Mendonça,et al.  Epipolar geometry from profiles under circular motion , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[35]  G. Andersen,et al.  Recovery of 3-D shape from deforming contours , 1991, Perception & psychophysics.

[36]  M Dantini,et al.  Shadows and Enlightenment , 2003 .

[37]  W. Hayward Effects of outline shape in object recognition , 1998 .

[38]  J. Gibson The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[39]  Donald D. Hoffman,et al.  Parts of recognition , 1984, Cognition.

[40]  James E. pLebensohn Geometry and the Imagination , 1952 .

[41]  Jan J. Koenderink,et al.  Inferring three-dimensional shapes from two-dimensional silhouettes , 1987 .

[42]  W. Mauch,et al.  Contents , 2007, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[43]  J. Aloimonos,et al.  On the kinetic depth effect , 1989, Biological Cybernetics.

[44]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  Learning to Perceive Differences in Solid Shape through Vision and Touch , 2008, Perception.

[45]  D. Knill,et al.  Geometry of shadows. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[46]  J T Todd,et al.  The Visual Discrimination of Relative Surface Orientation , 1995, Perception.

[47]  M. Lindauer,et al.  A Psychology of Picture Perception: Images and Information , 1974 .

[48]  Neil A. Macmillan,et al.  Detection Theory: A User's Guide , 1991 .

[49]  PV.,et al.  Contributions to the Analysis of the Sensations , 1897, Nature.

[50]  J Farley Norman,et al.  The perception and discrimination of local 3-D surface structure from deforming and disparate boundary contours , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[51]  Lothar Spillmann,et al.  Sensory Experience, Adaptation, and Perception : Festschrift for Ivo Kohler , 1984 .

[52]  Hideko F. Norman,et al.  Aging and the Visual, Haptic, and Cross-Modal Perception of Natural Object Shape , 2006, Perception.

[53]  Roberto Cipolla,et al.  Reconstruction of sculpture from its profiles with unknown camera positions , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[54]  Branka Spehar,et al.  When are viewpoint costs greater for silhouettes than for shaded images? , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[55]  D C Knill,et al.  Perception of surface contours and surface shape: from computation to psychophysics. , 1992, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[56]  Wendy L. Braje,et al.  Human efficiency for recognizing 3-D objects in luminance noise , 1995, Vision Research.

[57]  J T Todd,et al.  Perception of rigid motion in depth from the optical deformations of shadows and occlusion boundaries. , 1994, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.