An Opportunity-Based View of Rapid Internationalization

This article aims to better understand patterns of rapid internationalization by using the emerging international entrepreneurship paradigm. This involves (1) taking an opportunity-based view (OBV) rather than just the firm as a focal point of analysis, (2) focusing on dynamic entrepreneurial processes, and (3) stressing the importance of history. The authors gathered empirical evidence from 15 case studies of small and medium-sized enterprises in Australia. They find support for the central proposition that behind the gradual or rapid internationalization process lies a path-dependent process of opportunity development and cross-border venturing activities that is shaped by the domestic and international networks in which the key actors and organizations have operated in the past and in which they are currently operating. The evidence leads the authors to question the notion that rapid internationalization is indeed rapid. Importantly, it reveals that rapid internationalization seems to be a truly rapid process only when not taking an OBV. In doing so, the authors demonstrate that the OBV is a fruitful avenue of enquiry to advance knowledge in this area and underscore the importance of the entrepreneurial process and firm history.

[1]  B. Frey,et al.  Entrepreneurship as Recombinant Growth , 2002 .

[2]  P. Matthyssens,et al.  The Architecture of Multiple Case Study Research in International Business , 2004 .

[3]  Mike W. Peng.  The resource-based view and international business: , 2001 .

[4]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  International versus domestic entrepreneurship: New venture strategic behavior and industry structure , 1989 .

[5]  Jan Johanson,et al.  Commitment and opportunity development in the internationalization process: A note on the Uppsala internationalization process model , 2006 .

[6]  Paul D. Reynolds,et al.  New firm gestation: Conception, birth, and implications for research , 1992 .

[7]  David A. Vise,et al.  The Google Story : Inside the Hottest Business, Media, and Technology Success of Our Time , 2005 .

[8]  L. Mattsson,et al.  Dynamics of Overlapping Networks and Strategic Actions by the International Firm , 1999 .

[9]  S. Cavusgil,et al.  Marketing Strategy-Performance Relationship: An Investigation of the Empirical Link in Export Market Ventures , 1994 .

[10]  M. Augier,et al.  Administrative Behavior: A Study of Decision‐Making Processes in Administrative Organizations , 2002 .

[11]  Nathaniel Boso,et al.  Firm Innovativeness and Export Performance: Environmental, Networking, and Structural Contingencies , 2013 .

[12]  J. Jeannet,et al.  Challenging the incumbents: How high technology start‐ups compete globally , 1992 .

[13]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  Methodological issues in international entrepreneurship research , 2004 .

[14]  Henk W. Volberda,et al.  The role of path dependency and managerial intentionality: a perspective on international business research , 2007 .

[15]  Andrew C. Corbett.  Learning asymmetries and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities , 2007 .

[16]  Ian Wilkinson,et al.  Using narrative sequence methods to advance international entrepreneurship theory , 2007 .

[17]  Lorraine Eden.  Letter from the Editor-in-Chief: Happy 40th Anniversary! , 2009 .

[18]  Martin Hannibal,et al.  Stakeholders and Marketing Capabilities in International New Ventures: Evidence from Ireland, Sweden, and Denmark , 2012 .

[19]  S. Shane.  Prior Knowledge and the Discovery of Entrepreneurial Opportunities , 2000 .

[20]  H. Jansson,et al.  Reducing Uncertainty in the Emerging Market Entry Process: On the Relationship among International Experiential Knowledge, Institutional Distance, and Uncertainty , 2012 .

[21]  Yanto Chandra,et al.  Broadening the Concept of International Entrepreneurship: Consumers as International Entrepreneurs , 2009 .

[22]  Georg Schreyögg,et al.  Organizational Path Dependence: Opening the Black Box , 2009 .

[23]  Nicole Coviello,et al.  Internationalisation: conceptualising an entrepreneurial process of behaviour in time , 2005 .

[24]  Mark S. Granovetter.  The Strength of Weak Ties , 1973, American Journal of Sociology.

[25]  N. Coviello.  The network dynamics of international new ventures , 2006 .

[26]  Louise Young,et al.  The Importance of Networks in Export Promotion: Policy Issues , 1998 .

[27]  G. Knight,et al.  Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective , 2007 .

[28]  Geoff Easton,et al.  International competitiveness and trade promotion policy from a network perspective , 2000 .

[29]  Gerardo A. Okhuysen,et al.  Taking Time to Integrate Temporal Research , 2001 .

[30]  S. Zahra.  A theory of international new ventures: a decade of research , 2005 .

[31]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  International Entrepreneurship: The Intersection of Two Research Paths , 2000 .

[32]  Niron Hashai,et al.  Gradually Internationalizing ‘Born Global’ Firms: An Oxymoron? , 2004 .

[33]  G. Johns.  The Essential Impact of Context on Organizational Behavior , 2006 .

[34]  C. Gilbert.  Unbundling the Structure of Inertia: Resource Versus Routine Rigidity , 2005 .

[35]  D. MacKenzie,et al.  The use of knowledge about society , 2008 .

[36]  I. Wilkinson,et al.  The recognition of first time international entrepreneurial opportunities , 2009 .

[37]  G. Knight,et al.  Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm , 2004 .

[38]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[39]  P. Romer.  Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[40]  K. Simmonds,et al.  The first export order: a marketing innovation , 1968 .

[41]  T. Madsen,et al.  The internationalization of Born Globals: An evolutionary process? , 1997 .

[42]  Tarun Khanna,et al.  Bringing history (back) into international business , 2006 .

[43]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[44]  K. Vesper.  New venture strategies , 1979 .

[45]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[46]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Mechanism of Internationalisation , 1990 .

[47]  Luciano Ciravegna,et al.  Born global or born regional? Evidence from an exploratory study in the Costa Rican software industry , 2009 .

[48]  Heng Liu,et al.  Strategic Flexibility and International Venturing by Emerging Market Firms: The Moderating Effects of Institutional and Relational Factors , 2013 .

[49]  S. Shane,et al.  Opportunities and Entrepreneurship , 2003 .

[50]  I. Wilkinson.  Business Relating Business , 2008 .

[51]  E. Autio,et al.  Effects of Age at Entry, Knowledge Intensity, and Imitability on International Growth , 2000 .

[52]  Dante Di Gregorio,et al.  International new ventures: The cross-border nexus of individuals and opportunities , 2008 .

[53]  Mike Wright,et al.  The extent and nature of opportunity identification by experienced entrepreneurs , 2009 .

[54]  P. P. McDougall,et al.  Toward a theory of international new ventures , 1994 .

[55]  Steven B. Andrews,et al.  Structural Holes: The Social Structure of Competition , 1995, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[56]  David Kirkpatrick,et al.  The Facebook Effect: The Inside Story of the Company That Is Connecting the World , 2010 .

[57]  Ian Wilkinson,et al.  Business Relating Business: Managing Organisational Relations and Networks , 2008 .

[58]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Event- and outcome-driven explanations of entrepreneurship , 2004 .

[59]  D. Sharma,et al.  The internationalization process of Born Globals: a network view , 2003 .

[60]  Jim Bell,et al.  'Born-again global' firms: An extension to the 'born global' phenomenon , 2001 .

[61]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .

[62]  M. Hitt,et al.  International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. , 2000 .