Multi-site study of diffusion metric variability: effects of site, vendor, field strength, and echo time on regions-of-interest and histogram-bin analyses

It is now common for magnetic-resonance-imaging (MRI) based multi-site trials to include diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) as part of the protocol. It is also common for these sites to possess MR scanners of different manufacturers, different software and hardware, and different software licenses. These differences mean that scanners may not be able to acquire data with the same number of gradient amplitude values and number of available gradient directions. Variability can also occur in achievable b-values and minimum echo times. The challenge of a multi-site study then, is to create a common protocol by understanding and then minimizing the effects of scanner variability and identifying reliable and accurate diffusion metrics. This study describes the effect of site, scanner vendor, field strength, and TE on two diffusion metrics: the first moment of the diffusion tensor field (mean diffusivity, MD), and the fractional anisotropy (FA) using two common analyses (region-of-interest and mean-bin value of whole brain histograms). The goal of the study was to identify sources of variability in diffusion-sensitized imaging and their influence on commonly reported metrics. The results demonstrate that the site, vendor, field strength, and echo time all contribute to variability in FA and MD, though to different extent. We conclude that characterization of the variability of DTI metrics due to site, vendor, field strength, and echo time is a worthwhile step in the construction of multi-center trials.

[1]  R. Sener,et al.  Diffusion MRI: apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the normal brain and a classification of brain disorders based on ADC values. , 2001, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[2]  Jerry L. Prince,et al.  Effects of diffusion weighting schemes on the reproducibility of DTI-derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T , 2007, NeuroImage.

[3]  Jerry L Prince,et al.  Effects of signal‐to‐noise ratio on the accuracy and reproducibility of diffusion tensor imaging–derived fractional anisotropy, mean diffusivity, and principal eigenvector measurements at 1.5T , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  Jessica A. Turner,et al.  MultiCenter Reliability of Diffusion Tensor Imaging , 2012, Brain Connect..

[5]  J. Debbins,et al.  A Validation Study of Multicenter Diffusion Tensor Imaging: Reliability of Fractional Anisotropy and Diffusivity Values , 2012, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[6]  David Bonekamp,et al.  Diffusion tensor imaging in children and adolescents: Reproducibility, hemispheric, and age-related differences , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  Susumu Mori,et al.  Effects of b-value and echo time on magnetic resonance diffusion tensor imaging-derived parameters at 1.5 t: A voxel-wise study , 2013 .

[8]  A. Pfefferbaum,et al.  Replicability of diffusion tensor imaging measurements of fractional anisotropy and trace in brain , 2003, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Effects of echo time on diffusion quantification of brain white matter at 1.5T and 3.0T , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[10]  M. Filippi,et al.  Inter-sequence and inter-imaging unit variability of diffusion tensor MR imaging histogram-derived metrics of the brain in healthy volunteers. , 2003, AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology.

[11]  Naoto Hayashi,et al.  Effect of scanner in longitudinal diffusion tensor imaging studies , 2012, Human brain mapping.

[12]  John S. Duncan,et al.  Identical, but not the same: Intra-site and inter-site reproducibility of fractional anisotropy measures on two 3.0 T scanners , 2010, NeuroImage.

[13]  Juha Öhman,et al.  Repeatability and variation of region-of-interest methods using quantitative diffusion tensor MR imaging of the brain , 2012, BMC Medical Imaging.

[14]  Marco Rovaris,et al.  Intercenter differences in diffusion tensor MRI acquisition , 2010, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.