Assessing group learning and shared understanding in technology-mediated interaction

Without shared understanding, hardly any group learning takes place. Though much has been written about the essence of shared understanding, less is known about how to assess the process of reaching shared understanding. Therefore, the study focuses on ways of assessing shared understanding. A conceptual framework is described that makes a distinction between the process of reaching shared understanding and the resulting shared understanding. The conceptual ideas lead to a coding scheme for observing the processes of shared understanding and to the definition of product measures, among others a scale to assess perceived shared understanding. Then an empirical study is presented, in which the model is applied. A major conclusion is that it was hard to find reflective utterances in the protocols although the coding scheme provided for them.

[1]  A. Donnellon,et al.  Communication, Meaning, and Organized Action. , 1986 .

[2]  V. Rich Personal communication , 1989, Nature.

[3]  Stephanie D. Teasley,et al.  Perspectives on socially shared cognition , 1991 .

[4]  Herbert H. Clark,et al.  Grounding in communication , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[5]  R. Snow Toward Assessment of Cognitive and Conative Structures in Learning , 1989 .

[6]  J. Ruiz Moreno [Organizational learning]. , 2001, Revista de enfermeria.

[7]  Donald A. Norman,et al.  Things That Make Us Smart: Defending Human Attributes In The Age Of The Machine , 1993 .

[8]  Susan R. Fussell,et al.  Constructing shared communicative environments , 1991, Perspectives on socially shared cognition.

[9]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  The sociability of computer-supported collaborative learning environment , 2002, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[10]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[11]  Alan R. Dennis,et al.  Beyond media richness: an empirical test of media synchronicity theory , 1998, Proceedings of the Thirty-First Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[12]  J. R. Landis,et al.  The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. , 1977, Biometrics.

[13]  Erik D. Goodman,et al.  New methods for studying global virtual teams: towards a multi-faceted approach , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[14]  Jan T. van der Veen,et al.  Telematic Support for Group-Based Learning , 2001 .

[15]  H. H. Clark,et al.  Understanding by addressees and overhearers , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.