Sustaining superior performance in an emerging economy: an empirical test in the Indian context

We demonstrate a negative relationship between pro‐market reforms and the sustainability of superior profits in an emerging economy. The decline in sustainability of superior profits shows that pro‐market reforms bring significant threats in addition to the various opportunities such as greater availability of production factors and greater freedom to enter and operate businesses highlighted in the extant literature. Our study thus contributes to a more complete conceptual understanding of the performance consequences of pro‐market reforms in emerging economies. We also show that investment in research and development and greater investments in marketing and advertising are firm‐level resources that provide a measure of protection against the erosion in sustainability of superior profits associated with pro‐market reforms. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  S. Majumdar.  Foreign exchange legislation transformation and enterprise demography in India , 2008 .

[2]  J. Tybout,et al.  Manufacturing Firms in Developing Countries: How Well Do They Do, and Why? , 1998 .

[3]  Jaideep Anand,et al.  The Decline of Emerging Economy Joint Ventures: The Case of India , 2006 .

[4]  P. Ram.  India's New "TRIPs-Compliant" Patent Regime: Between Drug Patents and the Right to Health , 2006 .

[5]  Kent E. Neupert,et al.  Labor Flexibility and the Prevalence of High-Growth Entrepreneurial Activity1 , 2010 .

[6]  Keith D. Brouthers,et al.  Resource-Based Advantages in an International Context† , 2008 .

[7]  R. Vassolo,et al.  Institutional development and hypercompetition in emerging economies , 2010 .

[8]  Cevdet A. Denizer,et al.  Patterns of transition from plan to market , 1996 .

[9]  G. Saint‐Paul.  Is Labour Rigidity Harming Europe's Competitiveness? The Effect of Job Protection on the Pattern of Trade and Welfare , 1997 .

[10]  P. Roberts.  Product innovation, product–market competition and persistent profitability in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry , 1999 .

[11]  Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra,et al.  Structural Reform and Firm Exports , 2009 .

[12]  G. Nicodème,et al.  Product Market Reforms and Productivity: A Review of the Theoretical and Empirical Literature on the Transmission Channels , 2007 .

[13]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the firm and the evolutionary theory of the multinational corporation , 1993 .

[14]  Aya S. Chacar,et al.  Bringing institutions into performance persistence research: Exploring the impact of product, financial, and labor market institutions , 2010 .

[15]  M. Siems,et al.  How Do Legal Rules Evolve? Evidence from a Cross-Country Comparison of Shareholder, Creditor and Worker Protection , 2009 .

[16]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[17]  Alvaro Cuervo‐Cazurra,et al.  Promarket Reforms and Firm profitability in Developing Countries , 2009 .

[18]  Sunny Li Sun,et al.  The Institution-Based View as a Third Leg for a Strategy Tripod. , 2009 .

[19]  Ram Charan,et al.  Home Depot's blueprint for culture change , 2006 .

[20]  Michael E. Porter,et al.  The Emergence and Sustainability of Abnormal Profits , 2003 .

[21]  G. Waring,et al.  Industry Differences in the Persistence of Firm-Specific Returns , 1996 .

[22]  Tarun Khanna,et al.  The Nature of Diversified Business Groups: A Research Design and Two Case Studies , 2003 .

[23]  Aya S. Chacar,et al.  Are emerging economies less efficient? Performance persistence and the impact of business group affiliation , 2005 .

[24]  T. Bergstrom.  Evolution of Social Behavior: Individual and Group Selection Models , 2001 .

[25]  C. Prahalad,et al.  The end of corporate imperialism. , 2008, Harvard business review.

[26]  Mazhuvanchery Shiju Varghese.  The Indian Competition Act: A Historical and Developmental Perspective , 2010 .

[27]  Jaepil Choi,et al.  Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance , 2009 .

[28]  J. Pradhan,et al.  Liberalization, Firm Size and R&D Performance: A Firm Level Study of Indian Pharmaceutical Industry , 2003 .

[29]  Gita Piramal,et al.  World class in India: A casebook of companies in transformation , 2001 .

[30]  Dennis C. Mueller,et al.  The Dynamics of Company Profits , 2005 .

[31]  Omar N. Toulan,et al.  Beneath the Surface: The Impact of Radical Economic Reforms on the Outward Orientation of Argentine and Mendozan Firms, 1989–1995 , 1997, Journal of Latin American Studies.

[32]  M. Nerlove,et al.  Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects , 1988 .

[33]  Mike W. Peng.  Institutional Transitions and Strategic Choices , 2003 .

[34]  A. Shleifer,et al.  Legal Determinants of External Finance , 1997 .

[35]  B. Bowonder,et al.  Liberalization and the growth of business‐led R&D: the case of India , 2000 .

[36]  Robert E. Hoskisson,et al.  Strategy in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[37]  Stanley Fischer,et al.  The Process of Socialist Economic Transformation , 1991 .

[38]  C. Green,et al.  Leverage and business groups: Evidence from Indian firms , 2007 .

[39]  J. Kornai.  The Hungarian Reform Process: Visions, Hopes, and Reality , 1986 .

[40]  G. Dowling,et al.  Corporate reputation and sustained superior financial performance , 2002 .

[41]  T. Khanna,et al.  Emerging Giants: Building World-Class Companies in Developing Countries , 2006 .

[42]  T. Khanna,et al.  Is Group Affiliation Profitable in Emerging Markets? An Analysis of Diversified Indian Business Groups , 2000 .

[43]  D. Teece,et al.  Fundamental Issues in Strategy: A Research Agenda , 1994 .

[44]  R. Ramamurti.  A Multilevel Model of Privatization in Emerging Economies , 2000 .

[45]  M. Porter.  Towards a dynamic theory of strategy , 1991 .

[46]  M. Porter.  How Competitive Forces Shape Strategy , 1989 .

[47]  Nandini Gupta,et al.  Incumbents and protectionism: The political economy of foreign entry liberalization , 2008 .

[48]  Manuel R. Agosín,et al.  Openness and the International allocation of foreign direct investment , 2006 .

[49]  Aditya Bhattacharjea.  Labour Market Regulation and Industrial Performance in India: A Critical Review of the Empirical Evidence , 2007 .

[50]  Judith Lynne Zaichkowsky,et al.  Brand imitation and its effects on innovation, competition, and brand equity , 1999 .

[51]  Oliver Hart,et al.  The Market Mechanism as an Incentive Scheme , 1983 .

[52]  J. Sinacore.  Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions , 1993 .

[53]  Yi Jiang,et al.  An institution-based view of international business strategy: a focus on emerging economies , 2008 .

[54]  P. Geroski.  The dynamics of company profits: Modeling persistent profitability , 1990 .

[55]  Mike W. Peng,et al.  From diversification premium to diversification discount during institutional transitions , 2008 .

[56]  Montek S. Ahluwalia,et al.  Economic Reforms in India Since 1991: Has Gradualism Worked? , 2002 .

[57]  H. Yamawaki.  A Comparative Analysis of Intertemporal Behavior of Profits: Japan and the United States , 1989 .

[58]  T. Khanna,et al.  The Future of Business Groups in Emerging Markets: Long Run Evidence from Chile , 1998 .

[59]  Krishna G. Palepu,et al.  Policy Shocks, Market Intermediaries, and Corporate Strategy: 'The Evolution of Business Groups in Chile and India' , 1998 .

[60]  I. Mitroff,et al.  Preparing for evil. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[61]  Margaret A. Peteraf.  The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource‐based view , 1993 .

[62]  R. Rumelt.  Towards a Strategic Theory of the Firm , 1984 .

[63]  Robert Jacobsen,et al.  The persistence of abnormal returns , 1988 .

[64]  Markus Reitzig,et al.  On sharks, trolls, and their patent prey—Unrealistic damage awards and firms’ strategies of “being infringed” , 2007 .

[65]  A. Micco,et al.  Creditor protection and financial markets: empirical evidence and implications for Latin America , 2004 .

[66]  Johan Eklund,et al.  R&D and the Persistence of Profits , 2008 .