Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials.

PURPOSE Determining eligibility for a clinical trial (CT) typically requires a lengthy manual review of data for a single evaluation. The cost associated with eligibility screening is typically not compensated through contracts supporting CTs. METHODS We used a real-time tracking system that captures CT evaluations and provides information on evaluation outcomes and time spent on each eligibility screening by research staff. Using these data, we describe the effort and costs of eligibility screening overall and per enrolled patient for cancer CTs. The study sample included all completed eligibility assessment (evaluation) records for the 18-month study period. We used generalized multinomial modeling to predict evaluation outcomes and then used the resulting parameter coefficients to estimate the effort associated with each participant, adjusted for probability of being enrolled. From these data, we calculated cost associated with eligibility screening. RESULTS We found substantial variation in attributed cost by study type and phase. The cost of eligibility screening ranged by study phase from $129.15 to $336.48 per enrolled patient. The estimated annual cost of screening was more than $90,000. CONCLUSION This study provides results based on prospectively captured effort to estimate the largely nonreimbursed costs of eligibility screening and suggests that screening can be a significant financial burden to an institution. Centers performing CTs may need to acknowledge the differences in screening costs for different study types when negotiating contracts with funding organizations. Information such as that captured here could support such negotiations to reduce the gap between reimbursed and nonreimbursed costs.

[1]  J. Connett,et al.  Recruitment of participants in the Lung Health Study, II: Assessment of recruiting strategies. , 1993, Controlled clinical trials.

[2]  P. Butow,et al.  Randomized clinical trials in oncology: understanding and attitudes predict willingness to participate. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[3]  J. Ioannidis,et al.  Patterns of patient enrollment in randomized controlled trials. , 2001, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  D. Reboussin,et al.  Recruitment of participants for the Estrogen Replacement and Atherosclerosis (ERA) trial. a comparison of costs, yields, and participant characteristics from community- and hospital-based recruitment strategies. , 2001, Controlled clinical trials.

[5]  D. Gandara,et al.  Prospective evaluation of cancer clinical trial accrual patterns: identifying potential barriers to enrollment. , 2001, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  E. Fisher,et al.  The Diabetes Prevention Program: recruitment methods and results. , 2002, Controlled clinical trials.

[7]  M. E. Francis,et al.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of recruitment strategies in a community-based intervention study of HIV-infected persons , 2003, AIDS care.

[8]  B. L. Riggs,et al.  Costs and Strategies in Minority Recruitment for Osteoporosis Research , 2003, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[9]  M. Kuppermann,et al.  Recruitment strategies for minority participation: challenges and cost lessons from the POWER interview. , 2005, Ethnicity & disease.

[10]  D. Hamer,et al.  Strategies, time, and costs associated with the recruitment and enrollment of nursing home residents for a micronutrient supplementation clinical trial. , 2005, The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences.

[11]  J. Varni,et al.  Costs of recruiting couples to a clinical trial. , 2007, Contemporary clinical trials.

[12]  S. Jackson,et al.  Direct mailing was a successful recruitment strategy for a lung-cancer screening trial. , 2007, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[13]  M. Wasserman,et al.  Strategies and Cost of Recruitment of Middle-aged and Older Unmarried Women in a Cancer Screening Study , 2007, Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention.

[14]  L. Epstein,et al.  Cost effectiveness of recruitment methods in an obesity prevention trial for young children. , 2007, Preventive medicine.

[15]  C. Gross,et al.  Participation in Surgical Oncology Clinical Trials: Gender-, Race/Ethnicity-, and Age-based Disparities , 2007, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[16]  A. D. Galbreath,et al.  Cumulative recruitment experience in two large single-center randomized, controlled clinical trials. , 2008, Contemporary clinical trials.

[17]  Shari Bolen,et al.  Barriers to recruiting underrepresented populations to cancer clinical trials: A systematic review , 2008, Cancer.

[18]  M. Sinclair,et al.  Effectiveness and cost of recruitment strategies for a community-based randomised controlled trial among rainwater drinkers , 2009, BMC medical research methodology.

[19]  Galen Joseph,et al.  Recruiting minorities where they receive care: Institutional barriers to cancer clinical trials recruitment in a safety-net hospital. , 2009, Contemporary clinical trials.

[20]  T. Heeren,et al.  A cost-effectiveness analysis of subject recruitment strategies in the HIPAA era: results from a colorectal cancer screening adherence trial , 2009, Clinical trials.

[21]  Lois Lamerato,et al.  Recruitment methods employed in the prostate, lung, colorectal, and ovarian cancer screening trial , 2009, Clinical trials.

[22]  R. Young Cancer clinical trials--a chronic but curable crisis. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[23]  Harold L. Moses,et al.  A National Cancer Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century: Reinvigorating the NCI Cooperative Group Program , 2010 .

[24]  L. Penberthy,et al.  Automated matching software for clinical trials eligibility: measuring efficiency and flexibility. , 2010, Contemporary clinical trials.

[25]  R. Chlebowski,et al.  Prospective evaluation of two recruitment strategies for a randomized controlled cancer prevention trial , 2010, Clinical trials.

[26]  M. Lock,et al.  Effective and cost-effective clinical trial recruitment strategies for postmenopausal women in a community-based, primary care setting. , 2010, Contemporary clinical trials.

[27]  D. Aberle,et al.  Impact and costs of targeted recruitment of minorities to the National Lung Screening Trial , 2011, Clinical trials.

[28]  Jame Abraham,et al.  Barriers to recruitment of rural patients in cancer clinical trials. , 2011, Journal of oncology practice.