Dose evaluation for paediatric chest x-ray examinations in Brazil and Sudan: low doses and reliable examinations can be achieved in developing countries.

Radiation protection in paediatric radiology deserves special attention since it is assumed that children are more sensitive to radiation than adults. The aim of this work is to estimate the entrance skin dose (ESD), the body organ dose (BOD) and the effective dose (E) for chest x-ray exposure of paediatric patients in five large units, three in Sudan and two in Brazil, and to compare the results obtained in both countries with each other and with other values obtained by some European countries. Two examination projections have been investigated, namely, postero-anterior (PA) and antero-posterior (AP). The age intervals considered were: 0-1 year, 1-5 years, 5-10 years and 10-15 years. The results have been obtained with the use of a software called DoseCal. Results of mean ESD for the age interval 1-5 years and AP projection are: 66 microGy (Instituto de Pediatria e Puericultura Martagão Gesteira--IPPMG Hospital), 41, 86 and 68 microGy (Instituto Fernandes Figueira--IFF Hospital), 161 microGy (Omdurman Hospital), 395 microGy (Khartoum Hospital) and 23 microGy (Ahmed Gasim Hospital). In the case of the IFF Hospital, the results refer, respectively, to rooms 1, 2 and for the six mobile equipments. The reference dose values given by the European Guidelines were exceeded in the Khartoum Hospital whilst in all the other hospitals results obtained were below CEC reference values and comparable with the results found in Sweden, Germany, Spain and Italy. The mean E for the same age interval was 11 microSv in the IPPMG, 6, 15 and 11 microSv in the IFF, respectively for rooms 1, 2 and the 6 mobiles, 25 microSv in the Omdurman Hospital, 45 microSv in the Khartoum Hospital and 3 microSv in the Ahmed Gasim Hospital. These are some examples of the large discrepancies that have been detected in this survey.

[1]  B. Wall,et al.  A comparison of diagnostic radiology practice and patient exposure in Britain, France and Italy. , 1988, The British journal of radiology.

[2]  K. Ng,et al.  Doses to patients in routine X-ray examinations in Malaysia. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[3]  R. Gallini,et al.  Adult and Child Doses in Standardised X Ray Examinations , 1992 .

[4]  D. Blanc,et al.  European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images , 1998 .

[5]  J. J. Broerse,et al.  Assessment of Effective Dose in Paediatric Radiology: A Survey at 14 Dutch Hospitals , 2000 .

[6]  K Faulkner,et al.  Reference doses and quality in medical imaging. , 1998, The British journal of radiology.

[7]  H. Mccallum,et al.  Patient dose audit in diagnostic radiography using custom designed software , 1997 .

[8]  J. Millar,et al.  Optimization of radiographic technique for chest radiography. , 1995, British Journal of Radiology.

[9]  D. Hart,et al.  The significance of patient weight when comparing X-ray room performance against guideline levels of dose. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[10]  S. Mattsson,et al.  Dose Distribution in Children at Chest Radiography , 1995 .

[11]  Henry I. Kohn,et al.  Sources, Effects and Risks of Ionizing Radiation , 1989 .

[12]  W. Panzer,et al.  Effective dose — how effective for patients? , 1993, Radiation and environmental biophysics.

[13]  Jonathan L. Williams,et al.  A survey of radiation dose associated with pediatric plain-film chest X-ray examinations , 2002, Pediatric Radiology.

[14]  岩崎 民子 SOURCES AND EFFECTS OF IONIZING RADIATION : United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation UNSCEAR 2000 Report to the General Assembly, with Scientific Annexes , 2002 .

[15]  I H Kerr,et al.  Patient dose reduction in diagnostic radiology. , 1991, Clinical radiology.

[16]  E. Vañó,et al.  Measurement of radiation doses in the most frequent simple examinations in paediatric radiology and its dependence on patient age. , 1991, The British journal of radiology.

[17]  R. Sievert,et al.  Book Reviews : Recommendations of the International Commission on Radiological Protection (as amended 1959 and revised 1962). I.C.R.P. Publication 6. 70 pp. PERGAMON PRESS. Oxford, London and New York, 1964. £1 5s. 0d. [TB/54] , 1964 .

[18]  B. Wall,et al.  A national survey of doses to patients undergoing a selection of routine x-ray examinations in English hospitals. NRPB-R200 , 1986 .

[19]  J. Morant,et al.  A Regional Dose and Image Quality Survey for Chest, Abdomen and Pelvis Radiographs in Paediatrics , 2000 .

[20]  C. Martin,et al.  Implementation of a programme for reduction of radiographic doses and results achieved through increases in tube potential. , 1993, British Journal of Radiology.