Stochastic simulations of a synthetic bacteria-yeast ecosystem

BackgroundThe field of synthetic biology has greatly evolved and numerous functions can now be implemented by artificially engineered cells carrying the appropriate genetic information. However, in order for the cells to robustly perform complex or multiple tasks, co-operation between them may be necessary. Therefore, various synthetic biological systems whose functionality requires cell-cell communication are being designed. These systems, microbial consortia, are composed of engineered cells and exhibit a wide range of behaviors. These include yeast cells whose growth is dependent on one another, or bacteria that kill or rescue each other, synchronize, behave as predator-prey ecosystems or invade cancer cells.ResultsIn this paper, we study a synthetic ecosystem comprising of bacteria and yeast that communicate with and benefit from each other using small diffusible molecules. We explore the behavior of this heterogeneous microbial consortium, composed of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli cells, using stochastic modeling. The stochastic model captures the relevant intra-cellular and inter-cellular interactions taking place in and between the eukaryotic and prokaryotic cells. Integration of well-characterized molecular regulatory elements into these two microbes allows for communication through quorum sensing. A gene controlling growth in yeast is induced by bacteria via chemical signals and vice versa. Interesting dynamics that are common in natural ecosystems, such as obligatory and facultative mutualism, extinction, commensalism and predator-prey like dynamics are observed. We investigate and report on the conditions under which the two species can successfully communicate and rescue each other.ConclusionsThis study explores the various behaviors exhibited by the cohabitation of engineered yeast and bacterial cells. The way that the model is built allows for studying the dynamics of any system consisting of two species communicating with one another via chemical signals. Therefore, key information acquired by our model may potentially drive the experimental design of various synthetic heterogeneous ecosystems.

[1]  Yiannis N. Kaznessis,et al.  Models for synthetic biology , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[2]  E. Andrianantoandro,et al.  Synthetic biology: new engineering rules for an emerging discipline , 2006, Molecular systems biology.

[3]  Travis S. Bayer,et al.  Programmable ligand-controlled riboregulators of eukaryotic gene expression , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[4]  Wenying Shou,et al.  Synthetic cooperation in engineered yeast populations , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  Michael A. Gibson,et al.  Efficient Exact Stochastic Simulation of Chemical Systems with Many Species and Many Channels , 2000 .

[6]  Prodromos Daoutidis,et al.  Stochastic simulations of the tetracycline operon , 2011, BMC Systems Biology.

[7]  Howard M. Salis,et al.  Numerical simulation of stochastic gene circuits , 2005, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Christopher A. Voigt,et al.  Environmental signal integration by a modular AND gate , 2007, Molecular systems biology.

[9]  S. Basu,et al.  A synthetic multicellular system for programmed pattern formation , 2005, Nature.

[10]  M Grunberg-Manago,et al.  In Vitro Study of Two Dominant Inhibitory GTPase Mutants of Escherichia coli Translation Initiation Factor IF2 , 1999, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[11]  Lingchong You,et al.  Signal discrimination by differential regulation of protein stability in quorum sensing. , 2008, Journal of molecular biology.

[12]  M. Win,et al.  Higher-Order Cellular Information Processing with Synthetic RNA Devices , 2008, Science.

[13]  B. Øksendal.  Stochastic Differential Equations , 1985 .

[14]  Griffin M. Weber,et al.  BioNumbers—the database of key numbers in molecular and cell biology , 2009, Nucleic Acids Res..

[15]  T. Elston,et al.  Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes , 2005, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[16]  J. Collins,et al.  Construction of a genetic toggle switch in Escherichia coli , 2000, Nature.

[17]  Katherine Volzing,et al.  proTeOn and proTeOff, new protein devices that inducibly activate bacterial gene expression. , 2011, ACS chemical biology.

[18]  Vassilios Sotiropoulos,et al.  Synthetic tetracycline-inducible regulatory networks: computer-aided design of dynamic phenotypes , 2007, BMC Systems Biology.

[19]  Ahmad S. Khalil,et al.  Synthetic biology: applications come of age , 2010, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[20]  M. Win,et al.  A modular and extensible RNA-based gene-regulatory platform for engineering cellular function , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[21]  Ivan Razinkov,et al.  Sensing array of radically coupled genetic biopixels , 2011, Nature.

[22]  C. Collins,et al.  Engineering multicellular systems by cell-cell communication. , 2009, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[23]  Susanna Zucca,et al.  Characterization of a synthetic bacterial self-destruction device for programmed cell death and for recombinant proteins release , 2011, Journal of biological engineering.

[24]  Ron Weiss,et al.  Engineered bidirectional communication mediates a consensus in a microbial biofilm consortium , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[25]  Mat E. Barnet,et al.  A synthetic Escherichia coli predator–prey ecosystem , 2008, Molecular systems biology.

[26]  Claudia Schmidt-Dannert,et al.  Applications of quorum sensing in biotechnology , 2010, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[27]  Jared R. Leadbetter,et al.  Directed evolution of Vibrio fischeri LuxR for increased sensitivity to a broad spectrum of acyl‐homoserine lactones , 2004, Molecular microbiology.

[28]  Mads Kærn,et al.  Noise in eukaryotic gene expression , 2003, Nature.

[29]  M. Bennett,et al.  A fast, robust, and tunable synthetic gene oscillator , 2008, Nature.

[30]  R. C. Dickson,et al.  Direct selection of Saccharomyces cerevisiae resistant to the antibiotic G418 following transformation with a DNA vector carrying the kanamycin-resistance gene of Tn903. , 1983, Gene.

[31]  Farren J. Isaacs,et al.  Computational studies of gene regulatory networks: in numero molecular biology , 2001, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[32]  David Heath,et al.  Stochastic Differential Equations , 2006 .

[33]  W. R. Cluett,et al.  Dynamic metabolic engineering for increasing bioprocess productivity. , 2008, Metabolic engineering.

[34]  S. Quake,et al.  Long-Term Monitoring of Bacteria Undergoing Programmed Population Control in a Microchemostat , 2005, Science.

[35]  Robert J. Brooker,et al.  Genetics: Analysis and Principles , 1998 .

[36]  S. Basu,et al.  Spatiotemporal control of gene expression with pulse-generating networks. , 2004, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  F. Arnold,et al.  Engineering microbial consortia: a new frontier in synthetic biology. , 2008, Trends in biotechnology.

[38]  Yiannis N Kaznessis,et al.  Optimization of a stochastically simulated gene network model via simulated annealing. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[39]  Yiannis N. Kaznessis,et al.  Forward engineering of synthetic bio-logical and gates , 2008 .

[40]  R. Weiss,et al.  Programmed population control by cell–cell communication and regulated killing , 2004, Nature.

[41]  B. Bassler,et al.  Quorum sensing in bacteria. , 2001, Annual review of microbiology.

[42]  Jukka Intosalmi,et al.  An Algorithm for the Stochastic Simulation of Gene Expression and Heterogeneous Population Dynamics , 2011, 1110.6469.

[43]  Yiannis N Kaznessis,et al.  Model-driven designs of an oscillating gene network. , 2005, Biophysical journal.

[44]  R. Quatrano,et al.  Use of Bacterial Quorum-Sensing Components to Regulate Gene Expression in Plants1[W] , 2006, Plant Physiology.

[45]  Daniel A. Charlebois,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression and the Processing and Propagation of Noisy Signals in Genetic Networks , 2011 .

[46]  Yiannis Kaznessis,et al.  Accurate hybrid stochastic simulation of a system of coupled chemical or biochemical reactions. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[47]  Martin Fussenegger,et al.  Synthetic ecosystems based on airborne inter- and intrakingdom communication , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  Ying-jin Yuan,et al.  An Environment-Sensitive Synthetic Microbial Ecosystem , 2010, PloS one.

[49]  Yiannis N Kaznessis,et al.  An equation-free probabilistic steady-state approximation: dynamic application to the stochastic simulation of biochemical reaction networks. , 2005, The Journal of chemical physics.

[50]  D. Gillespie.  A General Method for Numerically Simulating the Stochastic Time Evolution of Coupled Chemical Reactions , 1976 .

[51]  M. Elowitz,et al.  A synthetic oscillatory network of transcriptional regulators , 2000, Nature.

[52]  L. You,et al.  Engineering microbial systems to explore ecological and evolutionary dynamics. , 2012, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[53]  D. Gillespie.  The chemical Langevin equation , 2000 .

[54]  Maung Nyan Win,et al.  Raw Data, Win MN, Smolke CD. 2008. Higher-order cellular information processing with synthetic RNA devices. Science. 322: 456-60. DOI: 10.1126/science.1160311 , 2009 .

[55]  Hidde de Jong,et al.  Modeling and Simulation of Genetic Regulatory Systems: A Literature Review , 2002, J. Comput. Biol..

[56]  P. Swain,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in a Single Cell , 2002, Science.

[57]  Cang Hui,et al.  Carrying capacity, population equilibrium, and environment's maximal load , 2006 .

[58]  M A Henson,et al.  Design and mathematical modelling of a synthetic symbiotic ecosystem. , 2008, IET systems biology.

[59]  David S. Wishart,et al.  The CyberCell Database (CCDB): a comprehensive, self-updating, relational database to coordinate and facilitate in silico modeling of Escherichia coli , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[60]  A. Arkin,et al.  Stochastic mechanisms in gene expression. , 1997, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.