Bottom-up Design of Three-Dimensional Carbon-Honeycomb with Superb Specific Strength and High Thermal Conductivity.

Low-dimensional carbon allotropes, from fullerenes, carbon nanotubes, to graphene, have been broadly explored due to their outstanding and special properties. However, there exist significant challenges in retaining such properties of basic building blocks when scaling them up to three-dimensional materials and structures for many technological applications. Here we show theoretically the atomistic structure of a stable three-dimensional carbon honeycomb (C-honeycomb) structure with superb mechanical and thermal properties. A combination of sp2 bonding in the wall and sp3 bonding in the triple junction of C-honeycomb is the key to retain the stability of C-honeycomb. The specific strength could be the best in structural carbon materials, and this strength remains at a high level but tunable with different cell sizes. C-honeycomb is also found to have a very high thermal conductivity, for example, >100 W/mK along the axis of the hexagonal cell with a density only ∼0.4 g/cm3. Because of the low density and high thermal conductivity, the specific thermal conductivity of C-honeycombs is larger than most engineering materials, including metals and high thermal conductivity semiconductors, as well as lightweight CNT arrays and graphene-based nanocomposites. Such high specific strength, high thermal conductivity, and anomalous Poisson's effect in C-honeycomb render it appealing for the use in various engineering practices.

[1]  Z. Fthenakis Ab initio investigation on the stability of H-6 Carbon , 2016 .

[2]  D. Tománek,et al.  Two-Dimensional Phosphorus Carbide: Competition between sp(2) and sp(3) Bonding. , 2016, Nano letters.

[3]  E. N. Zubarev,et al.  Carbon Honeycomb High Capacity Storage for Gaseous and Liquid Species. , 2016, Physical review letters.

[4]  I. Tanaka,et al.  First principles phonon calculations in materials science , 2015, 1506.08498.

[5]  J. Greer,et al.  Strong, lightweight, and recoverable three-dimensional ceramic nanolattices , 2014, Science.

[6]  K. Novoselov,et al.  Thermal conductivity of graphene laminate. , 2014, Nano letters.

[7]  D. Tománek,et al.  Topologically protected conduction state at carbon foam surfaces: an ab initio study. , 2014, Physical Review Letters.

[8]  Colin Ophus,et al.  Measurement of the intrinsic strength of crystalline and polycrystalline graphene , 2013, Nature Communications.

[9]  Kenneth E. Goodson,et al.  Thermal conduction phenomena in carbon nanotubes and related nanostructured materials , 2013 .

[10]  Nicholas Petrone,et al.  High-Strength Chemical-Vapor–Deposited Graphene and Grain Boundaries , 2013, Science.

[11]  Chao Gao,et al.  Multifunctional, Ultra‐Flyweight, Synergistically Assembled Carbon Aerogels , 2013, Advanced materials.

[12]  Z. G. Fthenakis,et al.  Energetics of graphene flakes , 2013 .

[13]  Martin L. Dunn,et al.  Bending rigidity and Gaussian bending stiffness of single-layered graphene. , 2013, Nano letters.

[14]  Feng Li,et al.  Flexible graphene-based lithium ion batteries with ultrafast charge and discharge rates , 2012, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  Jiangtao Wu,et al.  The nature of strength enhancement and weakening by pentagon-heptagon defects in graphene. , 2012, Nature materials.

[16]  D. Tománek,et al.  Formation and stability of cellular carbon foam structures: an ab initio study. , 2012, Physical review letters.

[17]  Songtao Lu,et al.  Synergistic effects from graphene and carbon nanotubes enable flexible and robust electrodes for high-performance supercapacitors. , 2012, Nano letters.

[18]  Junyong Kang,et al.  Thermal conductivity of isotopically modified graphene. , 2011, Nature Materials.

[19]  Alexander A. Balandin,et al.  Thermal Properties of Isotopically Engineered Graphene , 2011, 1112.5752.

[20]  Li-Min Wang,et al.  Three dimensional carbon-nanotube polymers. , 2011, ACS nano.

[21]  A. Enyashin,et al.  Graphene allotropes , 2011 .

[22]  Pinshane Y. Huang,et al.  Grains and grain boundaries in single-layer graphene atomic patchwork quilts , 2010, Nature.

[23]  Vivek B Shenoy,et al.  Anomalous Strength Characteristics of Tilt Grain Boundaries in Graphene , 2010, Science.

[24]  D. Broido,et al.  Optimized Tersoff and Brenner empirical potential parameters for lattice dynamics and phonon thermal transport in carbon nanotubes and graphene , 2010, 1003.2236.

[25]  N. Koratkar,et al.  Enhanced mechanical properties of nanocomposites at low graphene content. , 2009, ACS nano.

[26]  J. Kysar,et al.  Measurement of the Elastic Properties and Intrinsic Strength of Monolayer Graphene , 2008, Science.

[27]  L. Brinson,et al.  Functionalized graphene sheets for polymer nanocomposites. , 2008, Nature nanotechnology.

[28]  T. Clapp,et al.  Ultrastrong, Stiff, and Lightweight Carbon‐Nanotube Fibers , 2007 .

[29]  S. Stankovich,et al.  Preparation and characterization of graphene oxide paper , 2007, Nature.

[30]  M. Itkis,et al.  Graphite Nanoplatelet−Epoxy Composite Thermal Interface Materials , 2007 .

[31]  Xianfan Xu,et al.  Increased real contact in thermal interfaces: A carbon nanotube/foil material , 2007 .

[32]  G. Seifert,et al.  Hexagon-preserving carbon foams : Properties of hypothetical carbon allotropes , 2006 .

[33]  J. Tse,et al.  Graphene nanostructures as tunable storage media for molecular hydrogen. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[34]  S. Okada,et al.  Carbon three-dimensional architecture formed by intersectional collision of graphene patches , 2005 .

[35]  Andre K. Geim,et al.  Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films , 2004, Science.

[36]  R. Kubo Statistical Physics II: Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics , 2003 .

[37]  D. Tománek,et al.  Carbon foam: Spanning the phase space between graphite and diamond , 2001 .

[38]  P. McEuen,et al.  Thermal transport measurements of individual multiwalled nanotubes. , 2001, Physical review letters.

[39]  J. Ihm,et al.  Electronic structure and mechanical stability of the graphitic honeycomb lattice , 2000 .

[40]  Field,et al.  Theoretical strength and cleavage of diamond , 2000, Physical review letters.

[41]  T. Ebbesen Physical Properties of Carbon Nanotubes , 1997 .

[42]  Burke,et al.  Generalized Gradient Approximation Made Simple. , 1996, Physical review letters.

[43]  Kresse,et al.  Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. , 1996, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[44]  G. Kresse,et al.  Efficiency of ab-initio total energy calculations for metals and semiconductors using a plane-wave basis set , 1996 .

[45]  Blöchl,et al.  Projector augmented-wave method. , 1994, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[46]  Steve Plimpton,et al.  Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics , 1993 .

[47]  H. Karfunkel,et al.  New hypothetical carbon allotropes of remarkable stability estimated by modified neglect of diatomic overlap solid-state self-consistent field computations , 1992 .

[48]  M. Wolcott Cellular solids: Structure and properties , 1990 .

[49]  Cohen,et al.  Pseudopotential total-energy study of the transition from rhombohedral graphite to diamond. , 1986, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[50]  P. Liley,et al.  Thermal Conductivity of the Elements , 1972 .

[51]  E. Kandel,et al.  Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. Annual subject and author indexes. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.