Designing for Cohabitation: Naturecultures, Hybrids, and Decentering the Human in Design

Recent research in urban informatics has presented the city as both a complex technological center and a diverse cultural, social, and political entity. However, there has been little research into the changing role that nature plays in urban space, particularly when it comes to understanding how animals have adapted to life in technological and networked cities. In the wake of urbanization, new kinds of cohabitation, including increased interactions between humans and animals, has resulted in new challenges for those working in urban informatics. We leverage key concepts in the Anthropocene-naturecultures, hybrids, and decentering the human in design-to unpack the entanglements of animal-human-computer interaction in two design cases: The Big Cat Behavioral Tracking Initiative and The Phenology Clock. We contribute to urban informatics and HCI research by reflecting on ways in which design can promote new forms of cohabitation and support a broader conception of the city that sees animals as an essential part of the urban landscape.

[1]  S. Helmreich,et al.  THE EMERGENCE OF MULTISPECIES ETHNOGRAPHY , 2010 .

[2]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Animal-computer interaction: a manifesto , 2011, INTR.

[3]  Timo Ojala,et al.  Winter is coming: introducing climate sensitive urban computing , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[4]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Urban informatics , 2011, CSCW.

[5]  Nina-Marie E. Lister,et al.  Integrated adaptive design for wildlife movement under climate change , 2015 .

[6]  Anthony P. Clevenger,et al.  Anthropogenic effects on activity patterns of wildlife at crossing structures , 2014 .

[7]  Chris Philol,et al.  Animals, Geography, and the City: Notes on Inclusions and Exclusions , 1995 .

[8]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Storied spaces: Cultural accounts of mobility, technology, and environmental knowing , 2008, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[9]  Licia Capra,et al.  Urban Computing: Concepts, Methodologies, and Applications , 2014, TIST.

[10]  Megan A. Carney.  The biopolitics of 'food insecurity': towards a critical political ecology of the body in studies of women's transnational migration , 2014 .

[11]  T. Ingold.  The perception of the environment : essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill , 2000 .

[12]  Paul Dourish,et al.  HCI and environmental sustainability: the politics of design and the design of politics , 2010, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[13]  K. Toffoletti.  The Posthuman , 2014 .

[14]  K. U. Karanth,et al.  A cat among the dogs: leopard Panthera pardus diet in a human-dominated landscape in western Maharashtra, India , 2014, Oryx.

[15]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Utopias of participation: design, criticality, and emancipation , 2014, PDC '14.

[16]  Mara Miele,et al.  Naturecultures? Science, Affect and the Non-human , 2013 .

[17]  P. Longley.  From social butterfly to engaged citizen: urban informatics, social media, ubiquitous computing, and mobile technology to support citizen engagement , 2012 .

[18]  Laura Forlano,et al.  Decentering the Human in the Design of Collaborative Cities , 2016, Design Issues.

[19]  D. Haraway.  Anthropocene, Capitalocene, Plantationocene, Chthulucene: Making Kin , 2015 .

[20]  Eduardo O. Kohn,et al.  How Forests Think: Toward an Anthropology Beyond the Human , 2013 .

[21]  Matt Ratto.  Making at the end of nature , 2016, Interactions.

[22]  X. Bai,et al.  Re-conceptualizing the Anthropocene: A call for collaboration , 2016 .

[23]  Hyun Kim,et al.  Strategically Locating Wildlife Crossing Structures for Florida Panthers Using Maximal Covering Approaches , 2014, Trans. GIS.

[24]  Johannes Schöning,et al.  Unexpected journeys with the HOBBIT: the design and evaluation of an asocial hiking app , 2014, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[25]  François Gemenne,et al.  Thinking the Anthropocene , 2015 .

[26]  Carole L. Crumley,et al.  Reconceptualizing the 'Anthropos' in the Anthropocene: Integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research , 2013 .

[27]  Chris Speed,et al.  Thing Ethnography: Doing Design Research with Non-Humans , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[28]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Growing food in the city: design ideations for urban residential gardeners , 2015, C&T.

[29]  P. Verbeek.  What Things Do: Philosophical Reflections on Technology, Agency, and Design , 2005 .

[30]  Tau Ulv Lenskjold,et al.  A foray into not-quite companion species: design experiments with urban animals as significant others , 2014 .

[31]  William Cronon.  Uncommon ground : rethinking the human place in nature , 1996 .

[32]  Tom Jenkins,et al.  Object-Oriented Publics , 2016, CHI.

[33]  William Cronon,et al.  The Trouble with Wilderness , 1995 .

[34]  Jeffrey Bardzell,et al.  Interaction criticism: An introduction to the practice , 2011, Interact. Comput..

[35]  Andrew Stuart,et al.  Exploring interspecies sensemaking: dog tracking semiotics and multispecies ethnography , 2012, UbiComp.

[36]  Eli Blevis,et al.  Collapse informatics and practice , 2013, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[37]  P. Crutzen.  Geology of mankind , 2002, Nature.

[38]  C. Vitous,et al.  After Nature: A Politics for the Anthropocene , 2017 .

[39]  Clive Hamilton,et al.  The Anthropocene and the Global Environmental Crisis , 2015 .

[40]  Rose Johnson.  Using technology to reveal the politics of the built environment , 2013, UbiComp.

[41]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Urbane-ing the City , 2009, Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics.

[42]  J. Tambling.  How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature and Informatics by N. Katherine Hayles (review) , 2001, Modern Language Review.

[43]  J. Syvitski,et al.  Plausible and desirable futures in the Anthropocene: A new research agenda , 2016 .

[44]  Natalie Jeremijenko.  Creative Agency and the Space Race of the 21st Century: Towards a Museum of Natural Futures , 2016, Conference on Designing Interactive Systems.

[45]  Adrian Burton.  Learning to live with leopards , 2015 .

[46]  M. Kearnes,et al.  Urban Wild Things: A Cosmopolitical Experiment , 2005 .

[47]  Clara Mancini,et al.  Animal-computer interaction (ACI): changing perspective on HCI, participation and sustainability , 2013, CHI Extended Abstracts.

[48]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Immodest Proposals: Research Through Design and Knowledge , 2015, CHI.

[49]  Marcus Foth,et al.  Handbook of Research on Urban Informatics: The Practice and Promise of the Real-Time City , 2008 .

[50]  D. Haraway.  The Companion Species Manifesto: Dogs, People, and Significant Otherness , 2003 .

[51]  N. Thrift.  Environment and Planning D: Society and Space , 1995 .

[52]  Eric Baumer,et al.  Reflective Informatics: Conceptual Dimensions for Designing Technologies of Reflection , 2015, CHI.

[53]  Jamie Lorimer,et al.  Wildlife in the Anthropocene , 2017 .

[54]  Shaowen Bardzell,et al.  Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design , 2010, CHI.

[55]  H. Mouritsen,et al.  Anthropogenic electromagnetic noise disrupts magnetic compass orientation in a migratory bird , 2014, Nature.