Enhanced Matching Game for Decoupled Uplink Downlink Context-Aware Handover

In this paper, we address the problem of cell association during a handover performed in a dense heterogeneous network, where the preference of a mobile user’s equipment in terms of uplink traffic is not the same as for the downlink traffic. Therefore, since mobility is an intrinsic element of cellular networks, designing a handover from the perspective of the uplink and downlink is mandatory in the context of 5G cellular networks. Based on this arena, we propose a decoupled uplink-downlink handover scheme while making use of femtocells in order to maximize the overall network entity utilities and avoid overloading macrocells. However, the fact that the handover process is performed in a dense heterogeneous network makes the issue NP-hard. Therefore, taking into account the need for self-organizing solutions, we modeled the handover process as a matching game with externalities. Thus, we will provide an aspect of intelligence for the execution of the handover process to mobile user’s equipment (UE). To make the proposition more efficient, we integrate an assignment step to assist the matching game. Hence, the base stations will be investigated and filtered, keeping only the helpful base stations as the players in terms of the quality of service for the uplink and downlink. The numerical results verify the superiority of the proposed context-aware algorithm over traditional downlink handover and traditional decoupled uplink and downlink handover schemes, by improving the load balancing, increasing rates and reducing delays.

[1]  Junaid Ahmed,et al.  Analysis of K-tier 5G heterogeneous cellular network with dual-connectivity and uplink–downlink decoupled access , 2017, Telecommunication Systems.

[2]  Ziaul Haq Abbas,et al.  Decoupled Downlink-Uplink Coverage Analysis with Interference Management for Enriched Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2016, IEEE Access.

[3]  Constantinos Psomas,et al.  Mobility Management in Ultra-Dense Networks: Handover Skipping Techniques , 2018, IEEE Access.

[4]  George F. Riley,et al.  The ns-3 Network Simulator , 2010, Modeling and Tools for Network Simulation.

[5]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Cooperative Handover Management in Dense Cellular Networks , 2016, 2016 IEEE Global Communications Conference (GLOBECOM).

[6]  Nourddine Enneya,et al.  A Velocity-Aware Handover Trigger in Two-Tier Heterogeneous Networks , 2018, Future Internet.

[7]  Hazem H. Refai,et al.  Network densification: Challenges and opportunities in enabling 5G , 2015, 2015 IEEE 20th International Workshop on Computer Aided Modelling and Design of Communication Links and Networks (CAMAD).

[8]  Lin Gao,et al.  Two-Sided Matching Based Cooperative Spectrum Sharing , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[9]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Handover Management in 5G and Beyond: A Topology Aware Skipping Approach , 2016, IEEE Access.

[10]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Why to decouple the uplink and downlink in cellular networks and how to do it , 2015, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[11]  Mark C. Reed,et al.  Decoupled uplink-downlink association for finite multi-tier networks , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Communication Workshop (ICCW).

[12]  Jaime Lloret,et al.  An Intelligent handover process algorithm in 5G networks: The use case of mobile cameras for environmental surveillance , 2017, 2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications Workshops (ICC Workshops).

[13]  Walid Saad,et al.  Matching theory for priority-based cell association in the downlink of wireless small cell networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP).

[14]  Walid Saad,et al.  Matching Theory for Distributed User Association and Resource Allocation in Cognitive Femtocell Networks , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[15]  Amr M. Youssef,et al.  Ultra-Dense Networks: A Survey , 2016, IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials.

[16]  Walid Saad,et al.  Matching theory for future wireless networks: fundamentals and applications , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.

[17]  Yongming Huang,et al.  User association with jointly maximising downlink sum rate and minimising uplink sum power for heterogeneous cellular networks , 2015, IET Commun..

[18]  Gang Feng,et al.  Uplink Performance Improvement by Decoupling Uplink/Downlink Access in HetNets , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[19]  Tiankui Zhang,et al.  Joint Uplink and Downlink User Association for Energy-Efficient HetNets Using Nash Bargaining Solution , 2014, 2014 IEEE 79th Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring).

[20]  Mohamed-Slim Alouini,et al.  Handover management in dense cellular networks: A stochastic geometry approach , 2016, 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC).

[21]  Slawomir Stanczak,et al.  Dynamic Joint Uplink and Downlink Optimization for Uplink and Downlink Decoupling-Enabled 5G Heterogeneous Networks , 2016, ArXiv.

[22]  Vijay K. Bhargava,et al.  Joint Downlink and Uplink Aware Cell Association in HetNets With QoS Provisioning , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[23]  Alvin E. Roth,et al.  Chapter 16 Two-sided matching , 1992 .

[24]  Ekram Hossain,et al.  Decoupled Uplink-Downlink User Association in Multi-Tier Full-Duplex Cellular Networks: A Two-Sided Matching Game , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing.

[25]  Nourddine Enneya,et al.  A Seamless Handover Based MIH-Assisted PMIPV6 in Heterogeneous Network(LTE-WIFI) , 2017, BDCA'17.

[26]  Federico Boccardi,et al.  Downlink and Uplink Decoupling: A disruptive architectural design for 5G networks , 2014, 2014 IEEE Global Communications Conference.

[27]  Zhengang Pan,et al.  Toward green and soft: a 5G perspective , 2014, IEEE Communications Magazine.