The Use of Gain- or Loss-Frame Messages and Efficacy Appeals to Dissuade Excessive Alcohol Consumption Among College Students: A Test of Psychological Reactance Theory

The present study applies psychological reactance theory (PRT) to examine the effectiveness of a 2 (frame: gain, loss) × 2 (efficacy: present, not present) experiment to determine best practices in dissuading excessive alcohol consumption among college students. Results from the structural model revealed no association between a perceived threat to choose and message frame or efficacy appeals. As anticipated, a perceived threat to freedom was positively associated with state reactance, which in turn was positively associated with a boomerang effect and negatively associated with favorable source appraisal. State reactance was not associated with favorable attitudes toward preventing the overconsumption of alcohol. In addition to main effects, interactions between message frame and efficacy appeal with four person factors (participant age, trait reactance, perceived health risk, and alcohol consumption) were examined. Individuals perceiving health risk to be low would benefit from gain-frame messages, whereas loss-frame messages would be most effective for heavy drinkers. Finally, when communicating to underage drinkers, our results support using efficacy appeals when accompanied by a loss-frame message.

[1]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The effects of message framing on mammography utilization. , 1995, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[2]  Brian L. Quick,et al.  Examining the Role of Trait Reactance and Sensation Seeking on Perceived Threat, State Reactance, and Reactance Restoration , 2008 .

[3]  J. Brehm,et al.  Psychological Reactance: A Theory of Freedom and Control , 1981 .

[4]  Katherine M. White,et al.  Binge-Drinking: A Test of the Role of Group Norms in the Theory of Planned Behaviour , 2003 .

[5]  R. Zimmerman,et al.  The Short-Term Effects of a Computer-Based Pregnancy, STD, and HIV Prevention Program , 2008 .

[6]  R. L. Holbert,et al.  The Importance of Indirect Effects in Media Effects Research: Testing for Mediation in Structural Equation Modeling , 2003 .

[7]  Larry E. Toothaker,et al.  Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions , 1991 .

[8]  R. L. Holbert,et al.  Structural Equation Modeling in the Communication Sciences, 1995–2000 , 2002 .

[9]  M. Lombard,et al.  Content Analysis in Mass Communication: Assessment and Reporting of Intercoder Reliability , 2002 .

[10]  Kim Witte,et al.  Drama Theory and Entertainment Education: Exploring the Effects of a Radio Drama on Behavioral Intentions to Limit HIV Transmission in Ethiopia , 2007 .

[11]  Sarah Milne.  Self-efficacy in changing societies , 1999, Journal of health psychology.

[12]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Message framing and sunscreen use: gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. , 1999, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[13]  S. Chaiken,et al.  The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[14]  F. Treiber.  A comparison of the positive and negative consequences approaches upon car restraint usage. , 1986, Journal of pediatric psychology.

[15]  Michael Burgoon,et al.  Revisiting the Theory of Psychological Reactance: Communicating Threats to Attitudinal Freedom , 2002 .

[16]  F. Wallbrown,et al.  Psychological reactance and its relationship to normal personality variables , 1994, Cognitive Therapy and Research.

[17]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Using theory to design effective health behavior interventions. , 2003 .

[18]  Thomas Hugh Feeley,et al.  The Persuasive Effects of Message Framing in Organ Donation: The Mediating Role of Psychological Reactance , 2007 .

[19]  P. Caldwell.  Drinking Levels, Related Problems and Readiness to Change in a College Sample , 2002 .

[20]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk — Source link , 2007 .

[21]  Laura A. Brannon,et al.  Assessing College Students' Attitudes Toward Responsible Drinking Messages to Identify Promising Binge Drinking Intervention Strategies , 2007, Health communication.

[22]  Clayton Neighbors,et al.  Social Norms Approaches Using Descriptive Drinking Norms Education: A Review of the Research on Personalized Normative Feedback , 2006, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[23]  J. Dillard,et al.  On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication , 2005 .

[24]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The Strategic Use of Gain- and Loss-Framed Messages to Promote Healthy Behavior: How Theory Can Inform Practice , 2006 .

[25]  John R. Jung.  Changing the Focus of College Alcohol Prevention Programs , 2003, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[26]  M. C. Hill,et al.  Evaluating Model Fit , 2005 .

[27]  H. Vries,et al.  The influence of self‐efficacy on the effects of framed health messages , 2008 .

[28]  Ron Borland,et al.  Impact of Behavioral Intention on Effectiveness of Message Features Evidence From the Family Sun Safety Project , 1998 .

[29]  A. Bandura.  Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control , 1997, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy.

[30]  L. Bensley,et al.  The Role of Psychological Reactance in Drinking Following Alcohol Prevention Messages1 , 1991 .

[31]  J. Brehm.  A theory of psychological reactance. , 1981 .

[32]  H. Wechsler,et al.  Colleges Respond to Student Binge Drinking: Reducing Student Demand or Limiting Access , 2004, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[33]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The Effectiveness of Gain-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behavior: Is All Hope Lost? , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[34]  K. Wallston,et al.  Compliance to health recommendations: a theoretical overview of message framing , 1988 .

[35]  S. West,et al.  A comparison of methods to test mediation and other intervening variable effects. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[36]  Brian L. Quick,et al.  Further Evidence That Psychological Reactance Can Be Modeled as a Combination of Anger and Negative Cognitions , 2007, Commun. Res..

[37]  Ruth C. Engs,et al.  Reactance Theory: A Test with Collegiate Drinking , 1989 .

[38]  L. Atwood,et al.  Evaluating the Believability and Effectiveness of the Social Norms Message "Most Students Drink 0 to 4 Drinks When They Party" , 2006, Health communication.

[39]  R. W. Rogers,et al.  Beyond Fear Appeals: Negative and Positive Persuasive Appeals to Health and Self‐Esteem , 1988 .

[40]  Stephen Lacy,et al.  Sampling Error and Selecting Intercoder Reliability Samples for Nominal Content Categories , 1996 .

[41]  Brian L Quick,et al.  Examining the Use of Forceful Language When Designing Exercise Persuasive Messages for Adults: A Test of Conceptualizing Reactance Arousal as a Two-Step Process , 2008, Health communication.

[42]  P. Salovey,et al.  Comparing gain- and loss-framed messages for smoking cessation with sustained-release bupropion: a randomized controlled trial. , 2007, Psychology of addictive behaviors : journal of the Society of Psychologists in Addictive Behaviors.

[43]  P. Vitale,et al.  Reactance theory and alcohol consumption laws: further confirmation among collegiate alcohol consumers. , 1994, Journal of studies on alcohol.

[44]  T. Babor,et al.  Diagnosis of alcohol dependence in epidemiological surveys: an epidemic of youthful alcohol dependence or a case of measurement error? , 2006, Addiction.

[45]  John C Licciardone.  Perceptions of Drinking and Related Findings From the Nationwide Campuses Study , 2003, Journal of American college health : J of ACH.

[46]  F. Boster,et al.  Effects of Gain Versus Loss Frame Antidrug Ads on Adolescents , 2008 .

[47]  Robin L. Nabi.  Anger, fear, uncertainty, and attitudes: a test of the cognitive-functional model , 2002 .

[48]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior: the role of message framing. , 1997, Psychological bulletin.

[49]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Identifying Principal Risk Factors for the Initiation of Adolescent Smoking Behaviors: The Significance of Psychological Reactance , 2006, Health communication.

[50]  A. Bandura.  Social Cognitive Theory of Mass Communication , 2001 .

[51]  P. Shaver,et al.  Emotion knowledge: further exploration of a prototype approach. , 1987, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[52]  A. E. Kelly,et al.  Reactance and Thought Suppression , 1997 .

[53]  K. Witte.  Putting the fear back into fear appeals: The extended parallel process model , 1992 .

[54]  Sung-Mook Hong,et al.  Refinement of the Hong Psychological Reactance Scale , 1996 .

[55]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Adolescent Reactance and Anti-Smoking Campaigns: A Theoretical Approach , 2003, Health communication.

[56]  P. Salovey,et al.  Message Framing in the Prevention and Early Detection of Illness , 2002 .

[57]  P. Palmgreen,et al.  Sensation seeking, perceived message sensation value, personal involvement, and processing of anti-marijuana PSAs , 2001 .

[58]  Wayne T. Steward,et al.  Need for Cognition Moderates Responses to Framed Smoking-Cessation Messages 1 , 2003 .

[59]  Tamera R. Schneider,et al.  Visual and Auditory Message Framing Effects on Tobacco Smoking1 , 2001 .

[60]  Alexander J. Rothman,et al.  The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. , 2001, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[61]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Using Interactive Media Tools to Test Substance Abuse Prevention Messages , 2001 .

[62]  Claude H. Miller,et al.  Psychological Reactance and Promotional Health Messages: The Effects of Controlling Language, Lexical Concreteness, and the Restoration of Freedom , 2007 .

[63]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[64]  Stephen A. Rains,et al.  Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication: A Test and Extension of the Intertwined Model , 2007 .

[65]  Sun Young Lee,et al.  Interplay of Negative Emotion and Health Self-Efficacy on the Use of Health Information and Its Outcomes , 2008, Commun. Res..

[66]  G. Elwyn,et al.  Presenting risk information--a review of the effects of "framing" and other manipulations on patient outcomes. , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[67]  Jakob D. Jensen,et al.  The Relative Persuasiveness of Gain-Framed Loss-Framed Messages for Encouraging Disease Prevention Behaviors: A Meta-Analytic Review , 2007, Journal of health communication.

[68]  R. A. Wicklund.  Freedom and reactance , 1974 .

[69]  Schneiderman.  Framing of Decisions and Selections of Alternatives " in Hea l th Care , 2004 .

[70]  Jakob D. Jensen,et al.  The Advantages of Compliance or the Disadvantages of Noncompliance? A Meta-Analytic Review of the Relative Persuasive Effectiveness of Gain-Framed and Loss-Framed Messages , 2006 .

[71]  Brian L. Quick,et al.  The Reactance Restoration Scale (RRS): A Measure of Direct and Indirect Restoration , 2007 .