Affective response to architecture – investigating human reaction to spaces with different geometry

ABSTRACT A multidisciplinary research was carried out to reach an improved understanding of the connection between the geometry of space and human emotions. The research develops a framework and methodology to empirically examine and measure human reaction to various types of architectural space geometries. It involves two stages of investigations in which participants experience four spaces characterized by different geometries. Their reaction to the spaces was investigated by means of both qualitative and quantitative methods, which involved questionnaires in the first experiment and advanced sensors and data analysis in a second experiment. The experiments, which employ new virtual reality, electroencephalogram and data analysis methods, confirm the developed methodology. In the first stage of the investigation, participants showed different types of responses and preferences towards spaces. Results of the second stage’s experiment showed a difference in our mental reaction to different geometries of space.

[1]  Joachim Kieferle,et al.  Showing the invisible - Seven rules for a new approach of using immersive virtual reality in architecture , 2001 .

[2]  Yehuda E. Kalay,et al.  An Event-Based Model to Simulate Human Behaviour in Built Environments , 2009 .

[3]  Israel Cohen,et al.  Supervised source localization using diffusion kernels , 2011, 2011 IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics (WASPAA).

[4]  Jacquelyn Ford Morie,et al.  Development of a Data Management Tool for Investigating Multivariate Space and Free Will Experiences in Virtual Reality , 2005, Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback.

[5]  A. Maass,et al.  Intimidating Buildings , 2000 .

[6]  Stephan K. Chalup,et al.  Anthropocentric biocybernetic approaches to architectural analysis: new methods for investigating the built environment | NOVA. The University of Newcastle's Digital Repository , 2010 .

[7]  Moshe Bar,et al.  Emotional Valence Modulates the Preference for Curved Objects , 2011, Perception.

[8]  M. Bar,et al.  Humans Prefer Curved Visual Objects , 2006, Psychological science.

[9]  Moshe Bar,et al.  See it with feeling: affective predictions during object perception , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  John Zeisel,et al.  Inquiry by design: Environment/behavior/neuroscience in architecture, interiors, landscape, and planning. , 2006 .

[11]  M. Bar,et al.  Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  E. Spelke,et al.  Updating egocentric representations in human navigation , 2000, Cognition.

[13]  Emil Jovanov,et al.  Stress monitoring using a distributed wireless intelligent sensor system. , 2003, IEEE engineering in medicine and biology magazine : the quarterly magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society.

[14]  B. Baars,et al.  Brain, conscious experience and the observing self , 2003, Trends in Neurosciences.

[15]  Moshe Bar,et al.  The proactive brain: memory for predictions , 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  J. Gliem,et al.  Calculating, Interpreting, And Reporting Cronbach’s Alpha Reliability Coefficient For Likert-Type Scales , 2003 .

[17]  Daniel Gopher,et al.  Skill training in multimodal virtual environments. , 2012, Work.

[18]  Robert Gifford,et al.  The experience of personal space: Perception of interpersonal distance , 1983 .

[19]  Stéphane Mallat,et al.  Manifold Learning for Latent Variable Inference in Dynamical Systems , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[20]  Fayez Al-simadi,et al.  The Effect Of Personality Traits On Architectural Aesthetics' Evaluation: Familiar And Non-Familiar Environments As Evaluated By Architectural And Non-Architectural Students , 2002 .

[21]  Affect and processing dynamics Perceptual fluency enhances evaluations , 2002 .

[22]  A. Diamantopoulos,et al.  Guidelines for choosing between multi-item and single-item scales for construct measurement: a predictive validity perspective , 2012 .

[23]  Oshin Vartanian,et al.  Impact of contour on aesthetic judgments and approach-avoidance decisions in architecture , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[24]  Jan Malte Wiener,et al.  Isovists as a Means to Predict Spatial Experience and Behavior , 2004, Spatial Cognition.

[25]  P. Hekkert Design aesthetics: principles of pleasure in design , 2006 .

[26]  Paul J. Silvia,et al.  Do People Prefer Curved Objects? Angularity, Expertise, and Aesthetic Preference , 2009 .

[27]  R. Arnheim,et al.  Art and Visual Perception: A Psychology of the Creative Eye. , 1956 .

[28]  N. Schwarz,et al.  Processing Fluency and Aesthetic Pleasure: Is Beauty in the Perceiver's Processing Experience? , 2004, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[29]  C. Collet,et al.  Autonomic nervous system response patterns specificity to basic emotions. , 1997, Journal of the Autonomic Nervous System.

[30]  Maria V. Sanchez-Vives,et al.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[31]  Israel Cohen,et al.  Graph-Based Supervised Automatic Target Detection , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[32]  Michael J. Ostwald,et al.  Methodological characteristics of research testing prospect–refuge theory: a comparative analysis , 2013 .

[33]  Jan Hensen,et al.  Building Performance Simulation for Design and Operation , 2019 .

[34]  E. Rolls,et al.  Activation of the human orbitofrontal cortex to a liquid food stimulus is correlated with its subjective pleasantness. , 2003, Cerebral cortex.

[35]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  Use of Immersive Virtual Environments to Understand Human-Building Interactions and Improve Building Design , 2015, HCI.

[36]  Rajesh P. N. Rao,et al.  Embodiment is the foundation, not a level , 1996, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[37]  Tzyy-Ping Jung,et al.  Spatial Cognition and Architectural Design in 4 D Immersive Virtual Reality : Testing Cognition with a Novel Audiovisual CAVE-CAD Tool , 2011 .

[38]  Israel Cohen,et al.  Single-Channel Transient Interference Suppression With Diffusion Maps , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing.

[39]  Davide Schaumann,et al.  Simulating human behavior in not-yet built environments by means of event-based narratives , 2015, SpringSim.

[40]  Stéphane Lafon,et al.  Diffusion maps , 2006 .

[41]  L. Mandolesi Physiology of Behavior , 2002 .

[42]  Roy R. Lederman,et al.  Learning the geometry of common latent variables using alternating-diffusion , 2015 .

[43]  Nicu Sebe,et al.  In the eye of the beholder: employing statistical analysis and eye tracking for analyzing abstract paintings , 2012, ACM Multimedia.

[44]  Yehuda E. Kalay,et al.  Simulating Human Behaviour in Built Environments , 2005 .

[45]  Burcin Becerik-Gerber,et al.  Immersive virtual environments versus physical built environments: A benchmarking study for building design and user-built environment explorations , 2015 .

[46]  Claudia Mello-Thoms,et al.  Visual interest in pictorial art during an aesthetic experience. , 2007, Spatial vision.

[47]  Danielle M. Gerhard,et al.  Biological Psychology: An Introduction to Behavioral, Cognitive, and Clinical Neuroscience , 2013, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.

[48]  Gabriel A Radvansky,et al.  Walking through doorways causes forgetting: Situation models and experienced space , 2006, Memory & cognition.

[49]  Moshe Bar,et al.  Exploring Our Reaction to Different Geometries of Spaces , 2015 .

[50]  D. Leidner,et al.  Stepping into the internet: new ventures in virtual worlds , 2011 .

[51]  Hau-Tieng Wu,et al.  Assess Sleep Stage by Modern Signal Processing Techniques , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[52]  R. Zajonc Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. , 1968 .

[53]  Steve King,et al.  Has Aesthetics Been Objectified in Building Project Evaluation , 1998 .

[54]  M. Bar Visual objects in context , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.