Extended Social Cognitive Model Explains Pre-Service Teachers’ Technology Integration Intentions with Cross-Cultural Validity

Abstract Despite decades of efforts to address all levels of barriers, promoting technology integration in schools continues to be challenging and one of the most active research areas in teacher education worldwide. There is a need to better understand the factors influencing teachers’ intentions to integrate technology. Current models may lack parsimony and are limited in practical implications. Therefore, the primary purpose of the current study was to develop a new model by extending social cognitive theory. to explain pre-service teachers’ technology integration intentions and to test its cross-cultural validity with Turkish and Spanish pre-service teachers. The participants were 135 (76 Turkish and 59 Spanish) pre-service teachers in the early childhood education department. Path analysis results supported the utility of the model and revealed that openness, facilitating conditions, self-efficacy, and outcome expectations are interrelated, and each plays a unique and complex role in explaining technology integration intentions. More importantly, multi-group invariance analysis test results revealed that the proposed model explained pre-service teachers’ technology integration intentions in Turkish and Spanish samples with the exception of only one path, from openness to outcome expectations. The current extended social cognitive theory model is concise, includes pertinent constructs from other theoretical frameworks and models, and offers practical implications for teacher educators.

[1]  Kui Xie,et al.  Teachers’ exposure to professional development and the quality of their instructional technology use: The mediating role of teachers’ value and ability beliefs , 2020, Journal of Research on Technology in Education.

[2]  Joshua M. Rosenberg,et al.  Exploring pre-service teachers' use of technology: The technology acceptance model and expectancy-value theory , 2020, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[3]  Marios Pittalis,et al.  Extending the technology acceptance model to evaluate teachers’ intention to use dynamic geometry software in geometry teaching , 2020 .

[4]  Alison C. Koenka,et al.  Where do we go from here in academic motivation theory and research? Some reflections and recommendations for future work , 2020, Contemporary Educational Psychology.

[5]  Theodore J. Kopcha,et al.  Process over product: the next evolution of our quest for technology integration , 2020, Educational Technology Research and Development.

[6]  M. Shelley,et al.  Cross-cultural search for Big Five: development of a scale to compare personality traits of pre-service elementary school teachers in Turkey and Spain , 2018, Asia Pacific Education Review.

[7]  Young Ju Joo,et al.  Factors Influencing Preservice Teachers' Intention to Use Technology: TPACK, Teacher Self-efficacy, and Technology Acceptance Model , 2018, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[8]  Vanessa W. Vongkulluksn,et al.  The role of value on teachers' internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration , 2018, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Mitsutoshi Okazaki,et al.  Revised NEO Personality Inventory(NEO-PI-R)を用いたてんかん患者におけるパーソナリティ傾向に関する検討 , 2018 .

[10]  Dominik Petko,et al.  The Interplay of School Readiness and Teacher Readiness for Educational Technology Integration: A Structural Equation Model , 2018 .

[11]  Yulianto Kadji,et al.  SPSS For Windows Step By Step , 2017 .

[12]  Chun Lai,et al.  Modeling teachers' influence on learners' self-directed use of technology for language learning outside the classroom , 2015, Comput. Educ..

[13]  Jan Noyes,et al.  Explaining the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a multi-group analysis of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2014, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[14]  Teresa S. Foulger,et al.  Innovators in Teacher Education , 2013 .

[15]  Aytaç Göğüş,et al.  Educational technology acceptance across national and professional cultures: a European study , 2013 .

[16]  Peggy A. Ertmer,et al.  Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship , 2012, Comput. Educ..

[17]  M. Ince,et al.  Pre-service physical education teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge, technology integration self-efficacy and instructional technology outcome expectations , 2012 .

[18]  Abdulwahab Lawan,et al.  Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology , 2012, Encyclopedia of Education and Information Technologies.

[19]  Robert M. Maninger,et al.  Relationships among Preservice Teachers' Technology-Related Abilities, Beliefs, and Intentions to Use Technology in Their Future Classrooms , 2011 .

[20]  Jan Noyes,et al.  An assessment of the influence of perceived enjoyment and attitude on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: A structural equation modeling approach , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[21]  Anne Beaudry,et al.  Antecedents of computer self-efficacy: A study of the role of personality traits and gender , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[22]  T. Teo A path analysis of pre-service teachers' attitudes to computer use: applying and extending the technology acceptance model in an educational context , 2010, Interact. Learn. Environ..

[23]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Examining the influence of subjective norm and facilitating conditions on the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers: a structural equation modeling of an extended technology acceptance model , 2010 .

[24]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Investigating the Technology Acceptance among Student Teachers in Malaysia: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) , 2009 .

[25]  Timothy Teo,et al.  Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[26]  T. Teo Examining the Relationship between Student Teachers' Self-Efficacy Beliefs and Their Intended Uses of Technology for Teaching: A Structural Equation Modelling Approach. , 2009 .

[27]  T. Teo,et al.  Understanding Technology Acceptance in Pre-Service Teachers: A Structural-Equation Modeling Approach , 2009 .

[28]  Timothy Teo,et al.  A Cross-cultural Examination of the Intention to Use Technology between Singaporean and Malaysian pre-service Teachers: An Application of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) , 2008, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[29]  Jared Keengwe,et al.  Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise , 2008 .

[30]  Ismail Sahin,et al.  From the Social-Cognitive Career Theory Perspective: A College of Education Faculty Model for Explaining Their Intention to Use Educational Technology , 2008 .

[31]  Robert M. Maninger,et al.  Preservice Teachers' Abilities, Beliefs, and Intentions regarding Technology Integration , 2007 .

[32]  M. Berson,et al.  Diffusion of Technology Innovation in the Preservice Social Studies Experience: Results of a National Survey , 2007 .

[33]  Heshan Sun,et al.  The role of moderating factors in user technology acceptance , 2006, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[34]  Rachel A. Vannatta,et al.  Teacher Dispositions as Predictors of Classroom Technology Use , 2004 .

[35]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[36]  Donn Ritchie,et al.  What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? , 2002, Comput. Educ..

[37]  R. Bhagat Culture's Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations , 2002 .

[38]  Peggy A. Ertmer Addressing first- and second-order barriers to change: Strategies for technology integration , 1999 .

[39]  Betty Collis,et al.  Designing for Differences: Cultural Issues in the Design of WWW-Based Course-Support Sites , 1999, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[40]  G. Salomon,et al.  Educational Psychology and Technology: A Matter of Reciprocal Relations , 1998, Teachers College Record: The Voice of Scholarship in Education.

[41]  Deborah Compeau,et al.  Computer Self-Efficacy: Development of a Measure and Initial Test , 1995, MIS Q..

[42]  Steven D. Brown,et al.  Toward a Unifying Social Cognitive Theory of Career and Academic Interest, Choice, and Performance , 1994 .

[43]  Allan Wigfield,et al.  Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation: A developmental perspective , 1994 .

[44]  Henryk R. Marcinkiewicz Computers and Teachers: Factors Influencing Computer Use in the Classroom , 1993 .

[45]  D. Schunk Learning Theories: An Educational Perspective , 1991 .

[46]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[47]  A. Bandura Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory , 1985 .

[48]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Variability of teachers' technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility! , 2021, Comput. Educ..

[49]  Maria K. DiBenedetto,et al.  Motivation and social cognitive theory , 2020 .

[50]  Dale S. Niederhauser,et al.  Instructional Technology Integration Models and Frameworks: Diffusion, Competencies, Attitudes, and Dispositions , 2018 .

[51]  Anne T. Ottenbreit-Leftwich,et al.  The K-12 Educational Technology Handbook , 2018 .

[52]  William B. Gudykunst,et al.  Culture’s Consequences: Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations Across Nations [2nd edition]: Geert Hofstede , 2005 .

[53]  Kim E. Dooley,et al.  Towards a Holistic Model for the Diffusion of EducationalTechnologies: An Integrative Review of Educational InnovationStudies , 1999, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[54]  M. Fullan Why Teachers Must Become Change Agents , 1993 .

[55]  R. Hogan Personality and personality measurement. , 1991 .